Advertisement

Visualizing Prions: Graphic Representations and the Biography of Prions

Chapter
  • 32 Downloads
Part of the Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History book series (STMMH)

Abstract

Prions are proteins generally characterized by the ability to exist in two different forms or more precisely two different three-dimensional structures, one of them possibly causing disease when it aggregates. The prion hypothesis, as formulated by Stanley Prusiner, states that this aggregation causes specific neurological diseases such as bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). Even if both the mechanisms of this change of conformation and that of the aggregation are still enigmatic, the prion hypothesis has become a dominant model to which much heuristic power has been attributed in the 1990s. This could be a first paradox. Moreover, whereas three-dimensional structures clearly appear to be at the heart of the matter, Prusiner used mostly biochemical evidence to develop his hypothesis, without using, in the early days, any other graphic representations than that given by electron microscopy. This constitutes the second paradox at the origin of the present chapter since only computer representations of three-dimensional structures can explain and justify the prion theory as a model. Here, models are defined as theories with two distinct properties. First, models have an explanatory power more or less confirmed by experimental evidence, which distinguishes them from mere hypotheses. Second, models can be applied in domains other than those where they come from. Such application is possible due to the underlying formalism of models, or, as in the prion case, to the diffusion of a specific visualization culture.

Keywords

Prion Protein Prion Disease Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Infectious Process Yeast Prion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aguzzi, A. et al. (1997) ‘Neuro-immune Connection in Spread of Prions in the Body?’, The Lancet 349: 742–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aigle, M. and F. Lacroute (1975) ‘Genetical aspects of [URE3], a Non-mitochon- drial, Cytoplasmically Inherited Mutation in Yeast’, Mol. Gen. Genet. 136: 327–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amann, K. and K. Knorr-Cetina (1990) ‘The Fixation of (Visual) Evidence’, in M. Lynch and S. Woolgar (eds) Representation in Scientific Practice. Cambridge: MIT Press: 85–122.Google Scholar
  4. Anfinsen, C. (1973) ‘Principles that Govern the Folding of Protein Chains’, Science 181: 223–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Appel, R. D. et al. (1994) ‘A New Generation of Information Retrieval Tools for Biologists: the Example of the ExPASy WWW Server’, Trends Biochem. Sci. 19: 258–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baldwin, M. A. et al. (1998) ‘The Three-dimensional Structure of Prion Protein: Implications for Prion Disease’, Biochemical Society Transactions 26: 481–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bousset, L. et al. (2001) ‘Structure of the Globular Region of the Prion Protein Ure2 from the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae’, Structure (Camb.) 9(1): 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bousset, L. et al. (2002) ‘Structure and Assembly Properties of the Yeast Prion Ure2’, C.R. Biologies 325: 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brandner, S. et al. (1996) ‘Normal Host Prion Protein (PrPC) is Required for Scrapie Spread within the Central Nervous System’, PNAS USA 93: 13148–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cambrosio, A. (2000) ‘Argumentation, représentation, intervention: les rôles de l’imagerie dans les discours scientifiques’, ASp 27/30: 95–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chernoff, Y. O. et al. (1995) ‘Role of the Chaperone Protein Hspl04 in Propagation of the Yeast Prion-like Factor [psi+]’, Science 268(5212): 880–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corth, C. et al. (1997) ‘Prion (PrPSc)-specific Epitope Defined by a Monoclonal Antibody’, Nature 390(6655): 74–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Couzin, J. (2002) ‘In Yeast, Prions’ Killer Image Doesn’t Apply’, Science 297: 758–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox, B. S. (1965) ‘PSI, a Cytoplasmic Suppressor of Super-suppressor in Yeast’, Heredity 20: 505–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Crick, F. (1958) ‘On Protein Synthesis’, in F. K. Sanders (ed.) The Biological Replication of Macromolecules. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 138–63.Google Scholar
  16. Donne, D. G. et al. (1997) ‘Structure of the Recombinant Full-length Hamster Prion Protein PrP(29–231): the N Terminus is Highly Flexible’, PNAS USA 94(25): 13452–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez-Bellot, E. and C. Cullin (2001) ‘The Protein-only Theory and the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the Prions and the Propagons’, Cell Mol. Life Sci. 58(12–13): 1857–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferrin, T. E. et al. (1988) ‘The MIDAS Display System’, J. Mol. Graphics 6(1): 13–27, 36–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Francoeur, E. (2001) ‘Molecular Models and the Articulation of Structural Constraints in Chemistry’, in U. Klein (ed.) Tools and Modes of Representation in the Laboratory Sciences. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 95–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Francoeur, E. and J. Segal (2004) ‘From Model Kits to Interactive Computer Graphics’, in S. de Chadarevian and N. Hopwood (eds) Models: the Third Dimension of Science. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gasset, M. et al. (1992) ‘Predicted Alpha-helical Regions of the Prion Protein when Synthesized as Peptides Form Amyloid’, PNAS USA 89(22): 10940–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glatzel, M. and A. Aguzzi (2000) ‘PrPC Expression in the Peripheral Nervous System is a Determinant of Prion Neuroinvasion’, Journal of General Virology 81: 2813–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glockshuber, R. et al. (1997) ‘Three-dimensional NMR Structure of a Self-folding Domain of the Prion Protein PrP(121–231)’, Trends in Biochemical Sciences 22(7): 241–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Griesemer, J. R. (1991) ‘Must Scientific Diagrams Be Eliminable? The Case of Path Analysis’, Biology and Philosophy 6: 155–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Güntert, P. et al. (1991) ‘Efficient Computation of Three-dimensional Protein Structures in Solution from Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Data Using the Program DIANA and the Supporting Programs CALIBA, HABAS and GLOMSA’, J. Mol. Biol. 217: 517–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang, Z. et al. (1994) ‘Proposed Three-dimensional Structure for the Cellular Prion Protein’, PNAS USA 91(15): 7139–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huang, Z. et al. (1996) ‘Structures of Prion Proteins and Conformational Models for Prion Diseases’, Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 207: 49–67.Google Scholar
  28. James, T. L. et al. (1997) ‘Solution Structure of a 142-residue Recombinant Prion Protein Corresponding to the Infectious Fragment of the Scrapie Isoform’, PNAS USA 94(19): 10086–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnson, C. K. (1965) OR TEP: a FORTRAN Thermal-ellipsoid Plot Program for Crystal Structure Illustrations. ONRL Report No. 3794. Oak Ridge, Tenn.: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.Google Scholar
  30. Kaneko, K. et al. (1997) ‘Evidence for Protein X Binding to a Discontinuous Epitope on the Cellular Prion Protein during Scrapie Prion Propagation’, PNAS USA 94: 10069–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kay, L. E. (2000) Who Wrote the Book of Life? A History of the Genetic Code. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Keyes, M. E. (1999) ‘The Prion Challenge to the “Central Dogma” of Molecular Biology, 1965–1991. Part I: Prelude to Prions’ and ‘Part II: The Problem with Prions’, Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 30 (1 and 2): 1–19, 181–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Koradi, R. et al. (1996) ‘MOLMOL: a Program for Display and Analysis of Macromolecular Structures’, Journal of Molecular Graphics 14(1): 51–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuhn, T. S. (1977) The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Lacroute, F. (1971) ‘Non-Mendelian Mutation Allowing Ureidosuccinic Acid Uptake in Yeast’, J. Bacteriol. 106: 519–22.Google Scholar
  36. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Latour, B. (1993) ‘Le “Pédofil” De Boa Vista - Montage Photo-Philosophique’, in B. Latour (ed.) La Clef de Berlin. Paris: La Découverte: 171–225.Google Scholar
  38. Latour, B. and S. Woolgar (1979) Laboratory Life: the Social Construction of Scientific Facts. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Levinthal, C. (1966) ‘Molecular Model-Building by Computers’, Scientific American 214: 42–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lynch, M. (1985) ‘Discipline and the Material Form of Images’, Social Studies of Science 15(1): 37–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lynch, M. (1998) ‘The Production of Scientific Images: Vision and Re-Vision in the History, Philosophy, and Sociology of Science’, Communication and Cognition 31(2–3): 213–28.Google Scholar
  42. Martz, E. and E. Francoeur (2001) ‘History of Visualization of Biological Macromolecules’, http://www.umass.edu/microbio/rasmol/history.htm (latest revision 9/2001).Google Scholar
  43. Masison, D. C. and R. B. Wickner (1995) ‘Prion-inducing Domain of Yeast Ure2p and Protease Resistance of Ure2p in Prion-containing Cells’, Science 270(5233): 93–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Maunoury, M. T. et al. (1999) ‘Observer la science en action ou, comment les sciences de l’information permettent de suivre l’évolution et la convergence des concepts de prion et d’hérédité non mendélienne dans la littérature’, Médecine/Sciences 15(4): 577–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merz, P. et al. (1981) ‘Abnormal Fibrils from Scrapie-infected Brain’, Acta Neuropathologica 54: 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merz, P. et al. (1984) ‘Infection-Specific Particle from the Unconventional Slow Virus Diseases’, Science 225: 437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Morange, M. (1998) A History of Molecular Biology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Ottiger, M. et al. (1994) ‘The NMR Solution Structure of the Pheromone Er-2 from the Ciliated Protozoan Euplotes Raikovi’, Protein Science 3: 1515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pauling, L. et al. (1951) ‘The Structure of Proteins: Two Hydrogen-Bonded Helical Configurations of the Polypeptide Chain’, PNAS USA 37: 205–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Prusiner, S. (1982) ‘Novel Proteinaceous Infectious Particles Cause Scrapie’, Science 216: 136–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Prusiner, S. (1984) ‘Prions’, Scientific American 251: 48–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Prusiner, S. (1988) ‘Molecular Structure, Biology, and Genetics of Prions’, Advances in Virus Research 35: 83–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Prusiner, S. (1992) ‘Chemistry and Biology of Prions’, Biochemistry 31(49): 12277–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prusiner, S. (1994) ‘Biology and Genetics of Prion Diseases’, Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 48: 655–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Prusiner, S. (1998) ‘Prions’, PNAS USA 95(23): 13363–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Prusiner, S. et al. (1983) ‘Scrapie Prions Aggregate to Form Amyloid-like Birefringent Rods’, Cell 35: 349–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Prusiner, S. et al. (1987) ‘On the Biology of Prions’, Acta Neuropathologica 72: 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Raeber, A. J. et al. (1998) ‘Transgenic and Knockout Mice in Research on Prion Diseases’, Brain Pathology 8: 715–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rheinberger, H. J. (1997) Toward a History of Epistemic Things: Synthesizing Proteins in the Test Tube (Writing Science). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Riek, R. et al. (1996) ‘NMR Structure of the Mouse Prion Protein PrP(121–231)’, Nature 382: 180–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Riek, R. et al. (1997) ‘NMR Characterization of the Full-length Recombinant Murine Prion Protein mPrP (23–231)’, FEBS Letters 413: 282–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rudwick, M. J. S. (1976) ‘The Emergence of a Visual Language for Geological Science’, History of Science 14: 149–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sarkar, S. S. (1996) ‘Thinking of Biology - Decoding “Coding” - Information and DNA’, Bioscience 46: 857–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Segal, J. (2002) ‘Les premiers “replieurs” français: Michel Goldberg à l’Institut Pasteur et Jeannine Yon à Orsay’, Revue pour lhistoire du CNRS 7: 50–6.Google Scholar
  65. Shulamn, R. G. (2000) ‘D. C. Phillips’, Biographical Memoirs of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy Press: 166–81 (or http://books.nap.edu/books/030907035X/html/166.html)Google Scholar
  66. Soojung-Kim Pang, A. (1997) ‘Visual Representation and Post-Constructivist History of Science’, Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 28: 139–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Thieffry, D. (1996) ‘E. coli as a Model System with which to Study Cell- differentiation’, Hist. Philos. Life Sci. 18: 163–93.Google Scholar
  68. Thual, C. et al. (1999) ‘Structural Characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Prion-like Protein Ure2’, J. Biol. Chem. 274(19): 13666–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Umland, T. C. et al. (2001) ‘The Crystal Structure of the Nitrogen Regulation Fragment of the Yeast Prion Protein Ure2p’, PNAS USA 98(4): 1459–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wickner, R. B. (1994) ‘[URE3] as an Altered URE2 Protein: Evidence for a Prion Analog in Saccharomyces cerevisiae’, Science 264(5158): 566–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wickner, R. B. et al. (1995) ‘[PSI] and [URE3] as Yeast Prions’, Yeast 11(16): 1671–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wüthrich, K. (2001) The Way to NMR Structures of Proteins’, Nature Structural Biology 8: 923–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zahn, R. et al. (2000) ‘NMR Solution Structure of the Human Prion Protein’, PNAS USA 97(1): 145–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations