Skip to main content

The Bobby Lobby: Police Associations and the Policy Process

  • Chapter
Policy Networks in Criminal Justice

Abstract

There are particular sensitivities regarding the interface between British policing and the political process. Unique in the public services, policing is, at least in principle, governed by the constitutional doctrine of ‘operational independence’ generally referred to as constabulary independence (Lustgarten, 1986). While the primary thrust of this doctrine is to inhibit any attempt by external political authorities to seek to control or even influence policing policies - these are to be the exclusive province of chief police officers themselves - the discourse surrounding constabulary independence (Savage et al., 1999) draws a more general demarcation line between the world of policing and the world of politics. Not only must politics not impinge on policing but also the police must not become embroiled in politics. The apparent quid pro quo of constabulary independence is the notion that the police should not in turn dabble in political affairs. However, not only is the concept of constabulary independence itself hugely contentious (Lustgarten, 1986), the idea that the British police have managed to stay aloof from politics is, to say the least, problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • ACPO (1994) Your Police: A Service to Value, Fact Sheet No. 1 (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).

    Google Scholar 

  • ACPO (1995) In Search of Criminal Justice (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).

    Google Scholar 

  • ACPO (1998) In Search of Criminal Justice: Three Years On (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. and Ford, R. (2000) ‘‘ ‘Ofcop” Launched inWar on Crime’, The Times, 14 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brogden, M. (1982) The Police: Autonomy and Consent (London: Academic Press). The Bobby Lobby 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Charman, S. and Savage, S. P. (1999) ‘The new politics of law and order: labour, crime, and justice’, in Powell M. (ed.), New Labour, NewWelfare State? (London: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charman, S., Savage, S. P. and Cope, S. (1998) ‘Singing from the same hymn sheet: the professionalisation of the Association of Chief Police Officers’, International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, P. (1997) ‘Tough on liberty: has Labour changed sides on law and order?’, The Independent, 26 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (1984) ‘The role and power of pressure groups’, in Borthwick, R. and Spence, J. (eds), British Politics in Perspective (Leicester: Leicester University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, W. (1989) Pressure Groups, Politics and Democracy in Britain (London: Philip Allan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Holliday, I. (1993) ‘Organised interests after Thatcher’, in Dunleavy, P. Gamble, A. Holliday I, and Peele, G. (eds), Developments in British Politics 4 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, Press ± Now Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1993a) Inquiry into Police Responsibilities and Rewards (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1993b) Police Reform: A Police Service for the Twenty-First Century (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1995) Review of Police Core and Ancillary Tasks: Final Report (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, T. and Grimshaw, R. (1984) Controlling the Constable: Police Accountabilty in England and Wales (London: Muller/Cobden Trust).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, A. and Richardson, J. (1987) British Politics and the Policy Process (Hemel Hempstead: Unwin Hyman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. (1994) The Forces of Persuasion (Surbiton: Police Federation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettle, M. (1980) ‘The politics of policing and the policing of politics’, in P. Hain (ed.), Policing the Police Vol. 2, (London: John Calder).

    Google Scholar 

  • Leishman, F., Cope, S. and Stanie, P. (1996) ‘Reinventing and restructuring: towards a new ‘‘policing order”, in Leishman, F., Loveday, B. and Savage, S. P. (eds), Core Issues in Policing (Harlow: Longman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Loveday, B. (1995) ‘Reforming the police: from local service to State Police?’, Political Quarterly, 66,(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lustgarten, L. (1986) The Governance of Police (London: Sweet & Maxwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W., Jordan, G. and McLaughlin, A. (1994) ‘Interest groups and public policy: the insider/outsider model revisited’, Journal of Public Policy, 14, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, E. and Murji, K. (1998) ‘Resistance through representation: ‘story lines’, advertising and police federation campaigns’, Policing and Society, 8(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (1994) ‘Folk devils fight back’, New Left Review, 203, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • RCCJ (1993) Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Report (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R.(1985) The Politics of the Police, 1st edn, (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. and Jordan, A. (1979) Governing Under Pressure (Oxford: Martin Robertson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, G. (1989) The Individual and the Law (London: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M. (1978) The Acceptable Pressure Group (Farnborough: Saxon House). 54 Policy Networks in Criminal Justice

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, R. (1984) ‘Interest representation: the dominance of institutions’, American Political Science Review, 78, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, A. (1997) ‘From suspect to trial’, in Maguire, M. Morgan, and Reiner, R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. (1998) ‘The geography of police governance’, Criminal Justice Matters, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. and Charman, S. (1996) ‘In favour of compliance’, Policing Today, 2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. and Charman, S. (1997) ACPO: The Views of the Membership, report submitted to the Association of Chief Police Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. P. and Nash, M. (2001) ‘Law and order under Blair: New Labour or old’ conservatism, in Savage, S. P. and Atkinson, R. (eds), Public Policy under Blair (Basuigstoke: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1996) ‘Police governance: the Association of Chief Police Officers and constitutional change’, Public Policy and Administration, 11(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S. P., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1997) ‘ACPO: a force to be reckoned with?’, Criminal Lawyer, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1998) ‘ACPO: choosing the way ahead’, Policing Today, 4(2), June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1999) ‘The state of independence: the discourse of constabulary independence’, unpublished paper presented to the British Criminology Conference, Liverpool, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, S., Cope, S. and Charman, S. (1997) ‘Reform through regulation: transformation of the public police in Britain’, Review of Policy Issues, 3(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scraton, P. (1985) The State of the Police (London: Pluto).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1990) ‘Pluralism, reformed pluralism and neopluralism: the role of pressure groups in policy-making’, Political Studies, 38: 302±22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. (1993) Pressure, Power and Policy (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw, J. (1998) ‘Crime and old labour’s punishment’, The Times, 8 April, p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2001 Stephen P. Savage and Sarah Charman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savage, S.P., Charman, S. (2001). The Bobby Lobby: Police Associations and the Policy Process. In: Ryan, M., Savage, S.P., Wall, D.S. (eds) Policy Networks in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524347_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics