Abstract
There are particular sensitivities regarding the interface between British policing and the political process. Unique in the public services, policing is, at least in principle, governed by the constitutional doctrine of ‘operational independence’ generally referred to as constabulary independence (Lustgarten, 1986). While the primary thrust of this doctrine is to inhibit any attempt by external political authorities to seek to control or even influence policing policies - these are to be the exclusive province of chief police officers themselves - the discourse surrounding constabulary independence (Savage et al., 1999) draws a more general demarcation line between the world of policing and the world of politics. Not only must politics not impinge on policing but also the police must not become embroiled in politics. The apparent quid pro quo of constabulary independence is the notion that the police should not in turn dabble in political affairs. However, not only is the concept of constabulary independence itself hugely contentious (Lustgarten, 1986), the idea that the British police have managed to stay aloof from politics is, to say the least, problematic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
ACPO (1994) Your Police: A Service to Value, Fact Sheet No. 1 (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).
ACPO (1995) In Search of Criminal Justice (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).
ACPO (1998) In Search of Criminal Justice: Three Years On (London: Association of Chief Police Officers).
Baldwin, T. and Ford, R. (2000) ‘‘ ‘Ofcop” Launched inWar on Crime’, The Times, 14 February.
Brogden, M. (1982) The Police: Autonomy and Consent (London: Academic Press). The Bobby Lobby 53
Charman, S. and Savage, S. P. (1999) ‘The new politics of law and order: labour, crime, and justice’, in Powell M. (ed.), New Labour, NewWelfare State? (London: Polity Press).
Charman, S., Savage, S. P. and Cope, S. (1998) ‘Singing from the same hymn sheet: the professionalisation of the Association of Chief Police Officers’, International Journal of Police Science and Management, 1(1).
Donovan, P. (1997) ‘Tough on liberty: has Labour changed sides on law and order?’, The Independent, 26 February.
Grant, W. (1984) ‘The role and power of pressure groups’, in Borthwick, R. and Spence, J. (eds), British Politics in Perspective (Leicester: Leicester University Press).
Grant, W. (1989) Pressure Groups, Politics and Democracy in Britain (London: Philip Allan).
Holliday, I. (1993) ‘Organised interests after Thatcher’, in Dunleavy, P. Gamble, A. Holliday I, and Peele, G. (eds), Developments in British Politics 4 (Basingstoke: Macmillan, Press ± Now Palgrave).
Home Office (1993a) Inquiry into Police Responsibilities and Rewards (London: HMSO).
Home Office (1993b) Police Reform: A Police Service for the Twenty-First Century (London: HMSO).
Home Office (1995) Review of Police Core and Ancillary Tasks: Final Report (London: HMSO).
Jefferson, T. and Grimshaw, R. (1984) Controlling the Constable: Police Accountabilty in England and Wales (London: Muller/Cobden Trust).
Jordan, A. and Richardson, J. (1987) British Politics and the Policy Process (Hemel Hempstead: Unwin Hyman).
Judge, T. (1994) The Forces of Persuasion (Surbiton: Police Federation).
Kettle, M. (1980) ‘The politics of policing and the policing of politics’, in P. Hain (ed.), Policing the Police Vol. 2, (London: John Calder).
Leishman, F., Cope, S. and Stanie, P. (1996) ‘Reinventing and restructuring: towards a new ‘‘policing order”, in Leishman, F., Loveday, B. and Savage, S. P. (eds), Core Issues in Policing (Harlow: Longman).
Loveday, B. (1995) ‘Reforming the police: from local service to State Police?’, Political Quarterly, 66,(2).
Lustgarten, L. (1986) The Governance of Police (London: Sweet & Maxwell).
Maloney, W., Jordan, G. and McLaughlin, A. (1994) ‘Interest groups and public policy: the insider/outsider model revisited’, Journal of Public Policy, 14, 1.
McLaughlin, E. and Murji, K. (1998) ‘Resistance through representation: ‘story lines’, advertising and police federation campaigns’, Policing and Society, 8(4).
McRobbie, A. (1994) ‘Folk devils fight back’, New Left Review, 203, January/February.
Olson, M. (1971) The Logic of Collective Action (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
RCCJ (1993) Royal Commission on Criminal Justice: Report (London: HMSO).
Reiner, R.(1985) The Politics of the Police, 1st edn, (Brighton: Wheatsheaf).
Richardson, J. and Jordan, A. (1979) Governing Under Pressure (Oxford: Martin Robertson).
Robertson, G. (1989) The Individual and the Law (London: Penguin).
Ryan, M. (1978) The Acceptable Pressure Group (Farnborough: Saxon House). 54 Policy Networks in Criminal Justice
Salisbury, R. (1984) ‘Interest representation: the dominance of institutions’, American Political Science Review, 78, 1.
Sanders, A. (1997) ‘From suspect to trial’, in Maguire, M. Morgan, and Reiner, R. (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Criminology (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Savage, S. (1998) ‘The geography of police governance’, Criminal Justice Matters, June.
Savage, S. and Charman, S. (1996) ‘In favour of compliance’, Policing Today, 2(1).
Savage, S. and Charman, S. (1997) ACPO: The Views of the Membership, report submitted to the Association of Chief Police Officers.
Savage, S. P. and Nash, M. (2001) ‘Law and order under Blair: New Labour or old’ conservatism, in Savage, S. P. and Atkinson, R. (eds), Public Policy under Blair (Basuigstoke: Palgrave).
Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1996) ‘Police governance: the Association of Chief Police Officers and constitutional change’, Public Policy and Administration, 11(2).
Savage, S. P., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1997) ‘ACPO: a force to be reckoned with?’, Criminal Lawyer, April.
Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1998) ‘ACPO: choosing the way ahead’, Policing Today, 4(2), June.
Savage, S., Charman, S. and Cope, S. (1999) ‘The state of independence: the discourse of constabulary independence’, unpublished paper presented to the British Criminology Conference, Liverpool, July.
Savage, S., Cope, S. and Charman, S. (1997) ‘Reform through regulation: transformation of the public police in Britain’, Review of Policy Issues, 3(2).
Scraton, P. (1985) The State of the Police (London: Pluto).
Smith, M. (1990) ‘Pluralism, reformed pluralism and neopluralism: the role of pressure groups in policy-making’, Political Studies, 38: 302±22.
Smith, M. (1993) Pressure, Power and Policy (Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf).
Straw, J. (1998) ‘Crime and old labour’s punishment’, The Times, 8 April, p. 23.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2001 Stephen P. Savage and Sarah Charman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Savage, S.P., Charman, S. (2001). The Bobby Lobby: Police Associations and the Policy Process. In: Ryan, M., Savage, S.P., Wall, D.S. (eds) Policy Networks in Criminal Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524347_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524347_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41209-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52434-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)