‘Swil-bols and Tos-pots’: Drink Culture and Male Bonding in England, c.1560–1640

  • Alexandra Shepard

Abstract

When James Hart, a Northamptonshire physician, compiled his regimen KΛINIKH, or The Diet of the Diseased, his puritan tendencies came to the fore as he turned his attention to the dangers of excessive drinking, which he chose to treat primarily as a sin rather than a disease. While admitting that his theme was more fitting ‘for a divines pulpit than a Physitians penne’, he nonetheless begged his readers’ patience, ‘by reason this vice now so reigneth’, while he gave ‘this beastly sinne a lash or two’. He proceeded to rehearse arguments against drunkenness that were commonplace in the social and moral commentary of his day, to which men and women in early modem England may well have been exposed almost as frequently as the attractions of wine, beer and ale. It was the drunken man (rather than the drunken woman) that particularly preoccupied Hart. Drunkards, in Hart’s view, inverted all that was expected of men, both morally and socially. ‘Swil-bols, tos-pots’ and their ‘pot companions’ belched out oaths, were quarrelsome, slanderous, back-biting and even murderous, ‘unclean’ and adulterous. They loved their ale more than God, cheated their neighbours, wives and children, and ignored the dictates of deference. A drunken man, claimed Hart, ‘maketh little difference betwixt superiour, inferiour, equall’, and, as well as denying their superiors the ‘reverence and respect due unto them’, drunkards ‘even often mocke[d] and deride[d] them’.

Keywords

Europe Income Expense Dinate Gout 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    J.H. Bettey (ed.), The Case Book of Sir Francis Ashley J.P. Recorder of Dorchester 1614–1635 (Dorchester: Dorset Record Society, 1981), p. 45.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    A. Bray, ‘To Be a Man in Early Modern Society. The Curious Case of Michael Wigglesworth’, History Workshop Journal, 41 (1996), 155–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 6.
    A. Bray, Homosexuality in Renaissance England (London: Gay Men’s Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    P. Lyman, ‘The Fraternal Bond as a Joking Relationship: A Case Study of the Role of Sexist Jokes in Male Group Bonding’, in M.S. Kimmel and M.A. Messner (eds), Men’s Lives (London: Collier Macmillan, 1989), pp. 171–81;Google Scholar
  5. R.A. Strikwerda and L. May, ‘Male Friendship and Intimacy’, in L. May and R.A. Strikwerda (eds), Rethinking Masculinity: Philosophical Explorations in Light of Feminism (Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield, 1992), pp. 95–110.Google Scholar
  6. For a fuller discussion of this distinction, see A. Shepard, Meanings of Manhood in Early Modern England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), pp. 95–6.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    D.M. Halperin, ‘Introduction: Among Men — History, Sexuality, and the Return of Affect’, in K. O’Donnell and M. O’Rourke (eds), Love, Sex, Intimacy and Friendship between Men, 1550–1800 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).Google Scholar
  8. Cf. G.E. Haggerty, Men in Love: Masculinity and Sexuality in the Eighteenth Century (New York: Columbia University Press, 1999) andGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Bray, The Friend (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E.K. Sedgwick, Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (New York: Columbia University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
  11. A. Bray, ‘Homosexuality and the Signs of Male Friendship in Elizabethan England’, History Workshop Journal, 29 (1990), 1–19; idem, The Friend.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. See also B.R. Smith, Homosexual Desire in Shakespeare’s England: A Cultural Poetics (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  13. 11.
    A. Bray and Michel Rey, ‘The Body of the Friend: Continuity and Change in Masculine Friendship in the Seventeenth Century’, in T. Hitchcock and M. Cohen (eds), English Masculinities 1660–1800 (Harlow: Longman, 1999).Google Scholar
  14. See also L. Roper, Oedipus and the Devil: Witchcraft, Sexuality and Religion in Early Modern Europe (London and New York: Routledge, 1994), ch. 5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 12.
    For a discussion of the ways in which this distinction has (mis)informed the history of homosexuality, see D.M. Halperin, ‘Forgetting Foucault: Acts, Identities, and the History of Sexuality’, Representations, 63 (1998), 93–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. See also A. Shepard, ‘Just Good Friends? Same-Sex Intimacy in Early Modern Britain and Europe’. History Workshop Journal, 58 (2004), 289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 22.
    K. Wrightson, ‘Alehouses, Order and Reformation in Rural England, 1590–1660’, in E. Yeo and S. Yeo (eds), Popular Culture and Class Conflict, 1590–1914: Explorations in the History of Labour and Leisure (Brighton: Harvester, 1981), pp. 1–27.Google Scholar
  18. 23.
    A.L. Martin, Alcohol, Sex, and Gender in Late Medieval and Early Modern Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2001), pp. 62–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 28.
    M. Bateson (ed.), Records of the Borough of Leicester. Being a Series of Extracts from the Archives of the Corporation of Leicester, 1509–1603 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1905), pp. 108–9.Google Scholar
  20. 30.
    J.A. Sharpe, ‘Plebeian Marriage in Stuart England: Some Evidence from Popular Literature’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th ser., 36 (1986), 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 37.
    Shepard, Meanings of Manhood, pp. 162–6. See also E.A. Foyster, Manhood in Early Modern England: Honour, Sex and Marriage (Harlow: Longman, 1999), pp. 40–1Google Scholar
  22. 41.
    M. Douglas (ed.), Constructive Drinking: Perspectives on Drink from Anthropology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  23. 44.
    C. Muldrew, ‘The Culture of Reconciliation: Community and the Settlement of Economic Disputes in Early Modern England’, Historical Journal, 39 (1996), 915–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. See also B. Kümin, ‘Useful to Have, but Difficult to Govern: Inns and Taverns in Early Modern Bern and Vaud’, Journal of Early Modern History, 3 (1999), 153–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 45.
    P. Clark, ‘The Alehouse and the Alternative Society’, in D. Pennington and K. Thomas (eds), Puritans and Revolutionaries: Essays in Seventeenth-Century History Presented to Christopher Hill (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), pp. 47–72.Google Scholar
  26. See also J. Warner, ‘Historical Perspectives on the Shifting Boundaries around Youth and Alcohol. The Example of Pre-Industrial England, 1350–1750’, Addiction, 93 (1998), 641–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 46.
    Wrightson, ‘Alehouses, Order and Reformation’, pp. 7–8; P. Clark, The English Alehouse: A Social History 1200–1830 (London: Longman, 1983);Google Scholar
  28. P. Griffiths, Youth and Authority: Formative Experiences in England, 1560–1640 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996), pp. 209–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 48.
    Shepard, Meanings of Manhood, pp. 102–3. See also B.A. Tlusty, ‘Crossing Gender Boundaries: Women as Drunkards in Early Modern Augsburg’, in S. Backman, H. Künast, S. Ullmann and B.A. Tlusty (eds), Ehrkonzepte in der Frühen Neuzeit: Identitäten und Abgrenzungen (Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1998), pp. 185–97.Google Scholar
  30. 53.
    P. Griffiths, ‘Meanings of Nightwalking in Early Modem England’, The Seven-teenth Century, 13 (1998), 212–38; Shepard, Meanings of Manhood, pp. 96–8.Google Scholar
  31. 54.
    S.A.H. Burne (ed.), The Staffordshire Quarter Sessions Rolls, vol. 5: 1603–1606 (Kendal: Titus Wilson & Co., 1940), p. 238.Google Scholar
  32. 56.
    Shepard, Meanings of Manhood. See also M.E. Weisner, ‘Wandervogels and Women: Journeymen’s Concepts of Masculinity in Early Modern Germany’, Journal of Social History, 24 (1991), 767–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 57.
    Shepard, Meanings of Manhood, pp. 111–12; eadem, ‘Contesting Communities? “Town” and “Gown” in Cambridge, c.1560–1640’, in A. Shepard and P. Withington (eds), Communities in Early Modern England: Networks, Place, Rhetoric (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000). pp. 216–34.Google Scholar
  34. 58.
    B. Howard Cunnington (ed.), Records of the County of Wilts, Being Extracts from the Quarter Sessions Great Rolls of the Seventeenth Century (Devizes, 1932), p. 113.Google Scholar
  35. 61.
    For a summary of these trends, see K. Wrightson, Earthly Necessities: Economic Lives in Early Modern Britain (New York and London: Yale University Press, 2000), part 2, esp. pp. 221–6.Google Scholar
  36. 66.
    G.R. Quaife, Wanton Wenches and Wayward Wives. Peasants and Illicit Sex in Early Seventeenth Century England (London: Croom Helm, 1979), p. 166. See also Martin, Alcohol, Sex, and Gender, ch. 5; Roper, Oedipus and the Devil, ch. 5.Google Scholar
  37. 67.
    L. Gowing, Common Bodies: Women, Touch and Power in Seventeenth-Century England (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2003), p. 1.Google Scholar
  38. 68.
    Clark, ‘The Alehouse’; R. Trumbach, ‘The Birth of the Queen: Sodomy and the Emergence of Gender Equality in Modern Culture, 1660–1750’, in M.B. Duberman, M. Vicinus and G. Chauncey (eds), Hidden From History: Reclaiming the Gay and Lesbian Past (London: Penguin, 1989), pp. 129–40; idem, ‘London’s Sapphists: From Three Sexes to Four Genders in the Making of Modern Culture’, in J. Epstein and K. Straub (eds), Body Guards: The Cultural Politics of Gender Ambiguity (New York: Routledge, 1991), pp. 112–41; idem, ‘The Heterosexual Male in Eighteenth-Century London and His Queer Interactions’, in O’Donnell and O’Rourke (eds), Love, Sex, Intimacy and Friendship, pp. 87–127.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Alexandra Shepard 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexandra Shepard

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations