Advertisement

Faceless Figures: Is a Socially Responsible Decision Possible?

  • Jean-Luc Moriceau

Abstract

The ‘invisible hand’ has to be limited. The hand is not always that of a magician, transmuting the selfish interest of each individual into the collective interest. Sometimes the hand needs a rap across the knuckles. The hand cannot just hold everything and take everything; it also needs to be a hand stretched out to those whom it is strangling. Being invisible, it operates incognito, without a face, and thus without responsibility.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Social Responsibility Decision Theory Stakeholder Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Arendt, H. (1958) The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  2. Bergson, H. (1941) L’Evolution créatrice (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Coll. ‘Quadrige’, edition 1996).Google Scholar
  3. Chandler, A.D. (1977) The Visible Hand (Cambridge MA: Belknap Harvard).Google Scholar
  4. Châtelet, G. (1998) Vivre et penser comme des porcs (Paris: Gallimard Folio).Google Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G. and Gattary, F. (1980) Capitalisme et schizophrénie 2. Mille plateaux (Paris: Les éditions de Minuit).Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. with Malabou, C. (1999) La contre-allée (Paris, La Quinzaine Littéraire — Louis Vuitton).Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. (2001) ‘Deconstructions: The im-possible’, in S. Lotringer and S. Cohen (eds) French Theory in America (New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  8. Dodd, E.M., (1932) ‘For Whom are Corporate Managers Trustees?’, Harvard Law Review, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 1145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, The Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–91.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, E.R. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman).Google Scholar
  11. Hadot, P. (1995) Qu’est-ce que la philosophie antique? (Paris: Gallimard Folio).Google Scholar
  12. Lévinas, E. (1971) Totalité et infini: Essai sur l’extériorité (Leiden: Martinus Nijoff, ed: Paris, Le Livre de Poche).Google Scholar
  13. Lévinas, E. (1974) Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence (Leiden: Martinus Nijoff, ed: Paris, Le Livre de Poche).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lévinas, E. (1982) Ethique et infini (Paris, Arthème and Radio France).Google Scholar
  15. Lévinas, E. (1992) Ethique comme philosophie première (Paris: Payot et Rivages).Google Scholar
  16. Louche, C. (2004) Ethical Investment: Processes and Mechanisms of Institutionalisation in the Netherlands, 1990–2002 (Rotterdam: Erasmus University).Google Scholar
  17. Pesqueux, Y. (2002) Organisations: Modèles et représentations (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  18. Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  19. Ricceur, P. (1990) Soi-même comme un autre (Paris: Seuil, Coll. ‘Points’).Google Scholar
  20. Ricceur, P. (1995) Le Juste (Paris: Esprit).Google Scholar
  21. Smith, A. (1776) The Wealth of Nations (New York: Bantam edition).Google Scholar
  22. Solé, A. and Pham, D. (1999) ‘Cette image dont nous sommes si prisonniers’, in Collins, L. (ed) Questions de contrôle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  23. Stiglitz, J.E. (2003) Quand le capitalisme perd la tête (Paris: Fayard).Google Scholar
  24. Taylor, F.W. (1912) Scientific Management, Testimony to the House of Representatives Committee (republished in San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1947).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Jean-Luc Moriceau 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Luc Moriceau

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations