A Liberal Critique of the Corporation as Stakeholders

  • Hervé Mesure


This chapter fits into a double framework. First of all, it participates in the collective project of this book, which is to take into account and to comment upon the American foundations of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and of stakeholder theory (SHT). The intention is also to demonstrate the potential existence of a European school of thought on this subject. Secondly, this work fits into the framework of the works of the Chair DSO (Développement des Systèmes d’Organisation (CNAM, Paris, France)) on models of organization and of management (or government) for businesses. At the heart of this chair this text participates in the establishment of a research programme that aims at showing the value of political philosophy in the analysis of the institutions of contemporary capitalism (for example the company, industries, and so on).


Corporate Social Responsi Business Ethic Corporate Governance Social Contract Stakeholder Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Argandona, A. (1998) ‘The Stakeholder and the Common Good’, Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 17, pp. 1093–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boaz, D. (1997) Libertarianism (New York: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  3. Bonnafous-Boucher, M. (2004) ‘Quelques enjeux philosophiques de la Corporate Governance: le propriétarisme de la théorie des parties prenantes’, Corporate Governance, vol. 5, no. 4.Google Scholar
  4. Buchholtz, R.A. (2004) ‘The Natural Environment: Does it count?’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 130–3.Google Scholar
  5. Donaldson, T. (1982) Corporations and Morality (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  6. Donaldson, T. and Dunfee, T.W. (1994) ‘Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Theory’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–91.Google Scholar
  7. Donaldson, T. and Preston, L.E. (1995) ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–92.Google Scholar
  8. Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman).Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, R.E. (1994) ‘The Politics of Stakeholders Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quaterly, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 414–20.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, R.E. (1998) ‘Stakeholder Theory’, in C.L Cooper and C. Argyris (eds), The Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Business (New York: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
  11. Gomez, P.-Y. (2003) ‘Jalons pour une histoire des théories du gouvernement d’entreprise’, Finance Contrôle Stratégie, vol. 6, no. 4 (December), pp. 183–208.Google Scholar
  12. Gomez, P.-Y. and Korine, H. (2003) ‘Democracy in Corporatia. Tocqueville and the Evolution of Corporate Governance’, EMS LYON, Working Paper no. 2003/100.Google Scholar
  13. Gray, J. (1995) Liberalism (London: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Habermas, J. (1962/1978) L’espace public (trad. Fr. Paris: Payot).Google Scholar
  15. Hasmas, J. (1998) ‘The Normative Theories of Business Ethics. A Guide for the Perplexed’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hebert, S. (2004) ‘L’approche de la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises en droit des sociétés’, Séminaire CNAM LIPSOR-CDC, Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Jones, T.M. and Wicks, A.C. (1999) ‘Convergent Stakeholders Theory’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 206–221.Google Scholar
  18. Kristol, I. (1975) ‘On Corporate Capitalism in America’, The Public Interest (Fall), pp. 124–41.Google Scholar
  19. Kymlicka, W. (1990/2003) Les Théories de la justice: une introduction (Paris: Editions La Découverte/Poche).Google Scholar
  20. Laurent, A. (1998) Les grands courants du libéralisme (Paris: Armand Colin).Google Scholar
  21. Locke, J. (1690/1984) Traité de Gouvernement Civil (Paris: Garnier Flammarion).Google Scholar
  22. Lockack, D. (2002) Les droits de l’homme (Paris: Editions La Découverte, Coll. ‘Repères’).Google Scholar
  23. Maati, J. (1999) Le gouvernement de l’entreprise (Bruxelles: De Boeck Université).Google Scholar
  24. Miller, D. (1987/1989) (ed.) Dictionnaire de la pensée politique: hommes et idées (Paris: Hatier).Google Scholar
  25. Mintzberg, H. (1983) Power In and Around Organizations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell, R.K. Agle, B.E. and Wood, D.J. (1997) ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 853–86.Google Scholar
  27. Norman, W. (1998) ‘Inevitable and Unacceptable? Methodological Rawlsianism in Anglo-American Philosophy’, Political Studies, XLVI, pp. 276–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nozick, R. (1974/1988) Anarchie, état et utopie (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  29. Pesqueux, Y. (2004) ‘La théorie des parties prenantes en perspective’, Séminaire CNAM LIPSOR-CDC, Paris.Google Scholar
  30. Pesqueux, Y. and Biefnot, Y. (2002) L’éthique des affaires: management par les valeurs et responsabilité sociale (Paris: Editions d’Organisation).Google Scholar
  31. Proudhon, P.-J. (1840/1985) Qu’est-ce que la propriété? ou Recherche sur le principe du droit et et du gouvernement (Paris: Garnier-Flammarion, Coll. GF).Google Scholar
  32. Ralalko, RJ. (1999) ‘Corporate Punishment’, in C.L. Cooper and C. Argyris (eds), The Concise Blackwell Encyclopaedia of Management (New York: Blackwell Business).Google Scholar
  33. Rawls, J. (1971/1987) Théorie de la Justice (Paris: Editions du Seuil).Google Scholar
  34. Robe, J.-P. (1999) L’entreprise et le droit (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, Coll. ‘Que Sais-Je ?’).Google Scholar
  35. Ruby, C. (1996) Introduction à la philosophie politique (Paris: Editions La Découverte, Coll. ‘Repères’).Google Scholar
  36. Russell, B. (1946/1985) A History of Western Philosophy and its Connection with Political and Social Circumstances from the Earliest Times to the Present Day (London: Unwin Paperbacks, Coll. ‘Counterpoint’).Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, C. (1987) La liberté des Modernes (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  38. Tenzer, N. (1994) Philosophie politique (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, Coll. ‘Premier Cycle’).Google Scholar
  39. Vattimo, G. (2002) (ed.) Encyclopédie de la philosophie (Paris: Le Livre de Poche/Garzanti, Coll. ‘Pochothèque’).Google Scholar
  40. Wachsmann, P. (1995) Les droits de l’homme (Paris: Dalloz, 2nd edn).Google Scholar
  41. Wicks, C. Gilbert, D.R. Jr. and Freeman, R.E. (1998) ‘A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 475–98.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Hervé Mesure 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hervé Mesure

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations