An ‘Anglo-American’ Model of CSR?

  • Yvon Pesqueux


To start out, one could hypothesize that today’s extraordinary development of management curricula (a speculative bubble?) is matched by a similarly extraordinary development of concepts. One manifestation of this would be a generalization of the idea that a model of corporate social responsibility (CSR) really does exist. Inversely, this may be little more than a layman’s expression that pundits use to describe corporate economic activities via the discursive production of a bourgeois class that has got ‘all excited’ about this topic — a vulgate that comes with current attempts to renew an extremely blurred systemic perspective. And what exactly is CSR trying to hide? The stealthy nature of its own progress? The fact that it is easier to attack inexhaustible human resources when one purports to abandon the exploitation of exhaustible natural ones?


Corporate Social Responsibility Business Ethic Organizational Model Triple Bottom Line Corporate Social Responsibility Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albert, M. (1991) Capitalisme contre capitalisme (Paris: Le Seuil).Google Scholar
  2. Bastide, R. (1970) Le prochain et le lointain (Paris: Cujas).Google Scholar
  3. Dahl, R.A. (1972) ‘Prelude to Corporate Reform’, Business Society Review, no. 1.Google Scholar
  4. Farnetti, R. and Warde, I. (1997) Le modèle anglo-saxon en question (Paris: Economica).Google Scholar
  5. Flécheux, L. ‘Stéréotypes et préjugés: des filtres qui bloquent les relations inter-persormelles’, in Se former à l’interculturel (Paris: Centre de Documentation Tiers-Monde, Editions Charles Léopold Mayer), pp. 15–18.Google Scholar
  6. Foucault, M. (1971) Surveiller et punir (Paris: Gallimard, Coll. ‘n.r.f.’).Google Scholar
  7. Foucault, M. (1988) Dits et Ecrits (Paris: Gallimard, Vol. III), p. 655.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, M. (1971) Capitalism and Freedom (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  9. Fukuyama, F. (1992) La fin de l’histoire et le dernier homme (Paris: Flammarion).Google Scholar
  10. Habermas, J. (2003) L’avenir de la nature humaine — Vers un eugénisme libéral (Paris: Gallimard, Coll. ‘n.r.f. essais’).Google Scholar
  11. Hatchuel, A. (2000) ‘Y a-t-il un modèle français? Un point de vue historique’, Revue Française de Gestion Industrielle, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 9–14.Google Scholar
  12. Hutton, W. (1995) The State We’re In (London: Jonathan Cape).Google Scholar
  13. Mouffe, C. (1994) Le politique et ses enjeux — pour une démocratie plurielle (Paris: La Découverte/MAUSS).Google Scholar
  14. Pesqueux, Y. (2002) Organisations: modèles et représentations (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France).Google Scholar
  15. Simon, J.S., Powers, C.W. and Gunnemann, J.P. (1972) The Ethical Investors: Universities and Corporate Responsibilities (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Simon, H.A. (1993) Administration et Processus de décision (Paris: Economica).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Yvon Pesqueux 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yvon Pesqueux

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations