Social Rating: Performance Measurement or Social Mediation?

  • Françoise Quairel


Social rating aims at providing fund managers with objective measures on extra-financial performances. It summarizes the social and environmental companies’ profiles and gives a synthetic evaluation. Social rating is often deemed as a transposition of financial rating; as this rating provides financial actors and asset managers who have neither the time nor the expertise to appraise corporate social performances (CSP) with decision-making tools. It could be defined as an independent and objective opinion on environmental and social performances of the organization. Whether financial or social, the rating can be analysed as a ‘management tool’ according to Berry (1983), that is, ‘material or conceptual means aiming at reducing complexity and at simplifying reality’.


Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Rating Agency Credit Rating Socially Responsible Investment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Berry, M. (1983) ‘Une technologie invisible? Impact des instruments de gestion sur l’évolution des systèmes humains’, cahier de recherches, Ecole Polytechnique.Google Scholar
  2. Callon, M. (1998) ‘Introduction: The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics Approach’, in Callon M. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets (Oxford: Blackwell), pp. 1–57.Google Scholar
  3. Capron, M. and Quairel, F. (2004) Mythes et Réalités de l’entreprise responsable (Paris: La Découverte).Google Scholar
  4. Di Maggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, no. 48, pp. 47–160.Google Scholar
  5. Dejean, F., Gond, J.-P. and Leca, B. (2004) ‘Measuring the Unmeasured: An Institutional Entrepreneur Strategy in an Emerging Industry’, Human Relations, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 741–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gilbert, P. (1998) L’instrumentation de gestion, la technologie de gestion, sciences humaines (Paris: Economica).Google Scholar
  7. Griffin, J.J. and Mahon, J.F. (1497) ‘The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty Five Years of Incomparable Research’, Business and Society, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
  8. Moisdon, J.-C. et al., (1997) Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion (Paris: Seli Arslan, 1997).Google Scholar
  9. ORSE (2001) Guide des Organismes d’Analyse Sociétale (Paris: Editions La Découverte).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Françoise Quairel 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Françoise Quairel

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations