Policy-Making Reforms and Civil Service Systems: An Exploration of Agendas and Consequences

  • Marleen Brans
  • Diederik Vancoppenolle

Abstract

The professional and practical policy literature suggests that policy making across the world is confronted with two important trends that at first glance are not easily reconcilable: professionalization and the search for social responsiveness and societal support. Professionalization is aimed at building or rebuilding governments’ capacity for improving the effectiveness of policies by means of better policy design and evaluation. Gathering policy support, the literature suggests, requires communicative or interactive planning to make citizens co-owners of policy goals. Such co-ownership encourages citizens to internalize the goals and hence behave as supportive agents of the desired societal changes. Both developments affect the way in which governments manage their policy processes and deploy resources to support policy choices, that is, to set up support systems for policy capacity.

Keywords

Coherence Expense Tated Bran Stake 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bakvis H. (2000) ‘Rebuilding Policy Capacity in the Era of the Fiscal Dividend: a Report from Canada’ Governance vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bekke, H. A. G., J. L. Perry and A. J. Toonen (1996) Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Brans, M. (2002) ‘Abolishing Ministerial cabinets for re-inventing them? Comparative observations on professional policy advice and political control’, (ASPA paper, Phoenix, Arizona, March).Google Scholar
  4. Cabinet Office (1999a) Professional Policy Making for the 21st Century (London: Cabinet Office).Google Scholar
  5. Cabinet Office (1999b) White Paper on Modernising Government (London: Cabinet Office).Google Scholar
  6. Canadian Centre for Managament Development (CCMD) Strengthening Our Policy Capacity (Ottawa: CCMD)Google Scholar
  7. CMPS (2001) Better Policy making (London: Cabinet Office).Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, W. (2000) The Project on Trends: An Introduction’, Canadian Public Policy, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  9. Davies, H. T. O., S. Nutley and P. C. Smith (2000) What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Services (Bristol: The Policy Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dingwall, J. (2001) ‘Policy Research Initiative: Horizontal Projects’, Canadian Government Executive, vol. 3, pp. 8–11.Google Scholar
  11. Dror, Y. (1997) ‘Strengthening Government Capacity for Policy Development’, The International Journal of Technical Co-operation, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56–78.Google Scholar
  12. Hood, C. (1996) ‘Exploring variations in public management reform of the 1980s’, in H. Bekke, J. L. Perry and T. A. J. Toonen (eds), Civil Service Systems in Comparative Perspective (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press), pp. 268–86.Google Scholar
  13. Lasswell, H. D. (1960) ‘The technique of decision seminars’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, vol. 4, pp. 213–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lazareviciute, I. and T. Verheijen, (2000) ‘Organizing the Delivery of Policy Advice’, in T. Verheijen (ed.), Politico-Administrative Relations. Who Rules? (Bratislava: NISPAcee).Google Scholar
  15. Marshall, C. E. and D. Cashaback (2001) Players, Processes, Institutions: Central Agencies in Decision-Making (Ottawa: Institute on Governance).Google Scholar
  16. OECD (2001) Citizens as Partners, Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy Making (Paris: OECD).Google Scholar
  17. Page, E. (2001) Governing by Numbers: Delegated Legislation and Everyday Policy Making (Oxford: Hart).Google Scholar
  18. Peters, B. G. (1998a) Managing Horizontal Government (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development, January).Google Scholar
  19. Peters, B. G. (1998b) The Policy Capacity of Government, Research Paper no. 18 (Ottawa: Canadian Centre of Management Development).Google Scholar
  20. Pierre, J. (ed.) (1995) Bureaucracy in the Modern State. An Introduction to Comparative Public Administration (Aldershot: Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  21. PIU (2000a) Adding It Up (London: Cabinet Office).Google Scholar
  22. PIU (2000b) Wiring It Up (London: Cabinet Office).Google Scholar
  23. Privy Council Office (1996) Deputy Prime Minister Task Forces: From Studies to Action (Ottawa: Canadian Government).Google Scholar
  24. Rouban, L. (1999) Citizens and the New Governance: Beyond New Public Management. Implementation Research as Empirical Constitutionalism (Amsterdam: IOS).Google Scholar
  25. Schachter, M. and P. Haid (1999) Cabinet Decision-Making in Canada: Lessons and Practices (Ottawa: Institute on Governance).Google Scholar
  26. Sjoblöm, S. (1999) ‘Transparency and citizen participation’, in L. Rouban (1999) Citizens and the New Governance: Beyond New Public Management. Implementation Research as Empirical Constitutionalism (Amsterdam: IOS).Google Scholar
  27. Solesbury, W. B. (2001) Evidence Based Policy: Whence It Came and Where It’s Going (London: ESCR).Google Scholar
  28. Sterne, P. and S. Zagon (1997) Public Consultation Guide: Changing the Relationship between Government and Canadians (Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Management Development).Google Scholar
  29. Vancoppenolle, D. and M. Brans (2003) Consultatiecodes voor beleidsambtenaren: een internationale verkenning (Leuven: Steunpunt Bestuurlijke Organisatie Vlaanderen).Google Scholar
  30. Weimer, D. L. and A. R. Vining (1989) Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marleen Brans
  • Diederik Vancoppenolle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations