Spatial Linkages of the Chinese Economy

  • Wenqing Pan
  • Qiyun Liu
Part of the IDE-JETRO Series book series (IDE)


Covering a vast territory, the Chinese economy shows considerable diversity across different regions. Following the central Chinese government’s implementation of its ‘economic reform and open door’ policy, the South Coast and East Coast regions of China have experienced more development than the central and western regions. In 2002, the eastern, central and western regions of China showed per capita GDP of 13,335 yuan, 6,978 yuan and 5,388 yuan, respectively. By contrast, Shanghai’s per capita GDP is the highest in China, at 33,285 yuan — 10 times the level of the lowest-income region in China, Guizhou. The disparities between the regional economies of China are not only illustrated by the different levels of economic development, but are also reflected in differences in natural resources, industrial structure, human resources, and so on. With regard to natural resource distribution, coal, oil, natural gas, metal ore and agricultural resources are mainly distributed throughout the central and western regions of China, while the resources of the sea are obviously concentrated in the coastal areas, which are also dominated by a number of manufacturing industries. This has produced a particular spatial linkage in the Chinese economy: coal, oil, natural gas, metal ore and agricultural resources flow from the central and western regions to the coastal region, while manufactured products flow from the coastal region to the central and western regions. This will focus on the linkage between the regions in China at the beginning of the twenty-first century, and will use an Input-Output analysis to carry this out.


East Coast South Coast North Coast Northeast Region Intermediate Input 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beyers, W.B. (1976) ‘Empirical Identification of Key Sectors: Some Further Evidence’, Environment and Planning A, 8, 231–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blair, P.D. and R.E. Miller (1990) ‘Spatial Linkages in the US Economy’, in M. Chatterrji and R.E. Kuenne (eds), Dynamics and Conflict in Regional Structural Change, London: Macmillan, pp. 156–79.Google Scholar
  3. Dietzenbacher, E. (1997) ‘In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: A Reinterpretation as a Price Model’, Journal of Regional Science, 37, 629–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dietzenbacher, E. (2002) ‘Interregional Multipliers: Looking Backward, Looking Forward’, Regional Studies, 36(2), 125–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghosh, A. (1958) ‘Input-Output Approach in an Allocation System’, Economica, 25, 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO (2003) Multi-regional Input-Output Model for China 2000, Statistical Data Series No. 86, Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO.Google Scholar
  7. Isard, W. (1951) ‘Interregional and Regional Input-Output Analysis: A Model of Space Economy’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 33, 318–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, L.P. (1976) ‘The Measurement of Hirschmanian Linkages’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90, 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liu, Q. (1992) ‘Touru Chanchu Moxing Jiegou Fenxi de Mofanhua Wenti’ (On the Standardization of Input-Output Model Structure Analysis), in Q. Li (eds), Dangdai Zhongguo Touru Chanchu Yingyong yu Fazhan (Application and Development of Input-Output Analysis in China), Beijing: China Statistics Press, pp. 211–22.Google Scholar
  10. Liu, Q. (1993) Jingji Xitong Cuihua Fangfa he Moxing (Planning Method and Models for Economic System), Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  11. Liu, Q. (2002) ‘Shichang Jingji wei Touru Chanchu Moxing Yingyong Tuokai Gengguang Kongjian’ (Analysis of Input-Output Coefficient Structure), in X. Xu and Q. Liu (eds), Zhongguo Touru Chanchu Lilun yu Shijian 2001 (Input-Output Theory and Practice in China 2001), Beijing: China Statistics Press, pp. 11–13.Google Scholar
  12. Oosterhaven, J. (1988) ‘On the Plausibility of the Supply-driven Input-Output Model’, Journal of Regional Science, 28(2), 203–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shao, G. and R.E. Miller (1990) ‘Demand-side and Supply-side Commodity-Industry Multiregional Input-Output Models and Spatial Linkages in the U.S. Regional Economy’, Economic Systems Research, 2(3), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wenqing Pan
  • Qiyun Liu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations