The Differential Factors of Regional Development in China: A DPG Approach

  • Takaaki Kanazawa
Part of the IDE-JETRO Series book series (IDE)


Generally speaking, the economically active space is not a simple geometrical one, but is restricted in many ways. Among other restrictions, we can cite natural geography, human geography, historical and cultural conditions, institutions, and central and local government policies. The combinations of these factors determine disparities of economic activities between regions. This leads to different industrial structures being developed in different regions of the same country. We then need to consider what factors are important in explaining these regional differences in development and understanding what the differences indicate. In this chapter, using a deviation from proportional growth (DPG) model which is derived from structural decomposition techniques of Input-Output (IO) analysis,1 we compare the differences in industrial structure of the eight regions in China. The data of the interregional China IO table of 2000 are compared, and based on these comparisons, we analyse its factors in each industrial sector from the point of view of the demand.


Transport Equipment Location Quotient Petroleum Processing Domestic Trade Differential Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Cheng, X. (ed.) (2001) Woguo Diqu Bijiaoyoushi Yanjiu (The Research of Regional Comparative Advantage in China), Beijing: China Planning Publishing House.Google Scholar
  2. Dietzenbacher, E. and B. Los (1998) ‘Structural Decomposition Techniques: Sense and Sensitivity’, Economic Systems Research, 10, 307–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujikawa, K. (1999) Guroobaru Keizai no Sangyorenkan Bunseki (Input-Output Analysis: Foudations and Extensions), Tokyo: Sobunsha.Google Scholar
  4. Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO (2003) Multi-regional Input-Output Model for China 2000, Statistical Data Series no. 86, Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO.Google Scholar
  5. Kanazawa, T. (2003) ‘Chugokuniokeru Chiikisangyokousei nikansuru Kousatsu — Chiiki Sangyorenkan DPG bunsekiwo Chuushinnishita Shoukyuukanhikaku’ (The Consideration on Factors of Differences on Regional Industrial Structure: Inter-Provincial Comparison by Interregional DPG Analysis), in N. Okamoto (ed.), Chugoku no Chiikikan Sangyokozo-Chiikikan Snagyorenkan Bunseki (II) (Interregional Industrial Structure in China — Interregional Input-Output Analysis), Asian Input-Output Series no. 63, Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies-JETRO, chapter 5.Google Scholar
  6. National Bureau of Statistics of China (2001) Chinese Statistical Yearbook 2001, Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
  7. Rose, A.Z. and S. Casler (1996) ‘Input-Output Structural Decomposition Analysis: A Critical Appraisal’, Economic Systems Research, 8, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takaaki Kanazawa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations