Abstract
At the outset of their book Relevance, Sperber and Wilson (1986/1995) remind the reader: ‘In writing this book, we have not literally put our thoughts down on paper. What we have put down on paper are little dark marks, a copy of which you are now looking at. As for our thoughts, they remain where they always were, inside our brains.’ With these witty remarks, they note that while we often think and speak as if language were a conduit for thought, this is only a metaphor, and a deceptive one at that. It is deceptive because it implies that language comprehension can be reduced to a decoding process (Reddy, 1979). Another, perhaps more appropriate, metaphor involves a portrait of the language user as a paleontologist who constructs theories about extinct animals based on linguistic fossil input. But regardless of one’s favourite metaphor for the relative import of coded and inferential aspects of language comprehension, recent advances in the study of language suggest that the many-headed beast we call meaning depends importantly on electrical activity in the brains of the speakers and hearers who construct it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bach, K. (1994). Mind and Language 9: 124–62.
Barwise, J. P., John (1983). Situations and Attitudes, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bentin, S. (1987). Brain and Language 31: 308–27.
Carston, R. (2002). In Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
Coles, M., Gratton, G., and Fabiani, M. (1990). In J. C. a L. Tassinary (ed.), Principles of Psychophysiology: Physical Social and Inferential elements: 413–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S. (2000). Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Coulson, S., and Van Petten, C. (2002). Memory and Cognition 30: 958–68.
Coulson, S., King, J. W., and Kutas, M. (1998a). Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 653–72.
Coulson, S., King, J. W., and Kutas, M. (1998b). Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 21–58.
Coulson, S., and Kutas, M. (1998). UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report: 98–103.
Coulson, S., and Kutas, M. (2001). Neuroscience Letters 316: 71–4.
Coulson, S., and Matlock, T. (2001). Metaphor and Symbol 16: 295–316.
Donchin, E. C. M. (1988). Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 357–74.
Donchin, E., Ritter, W., and McCallum, C. (1978). In E. Callaway, P. T., and S. H. Koslow (eds), Brain Event-Related Potentials in Man. New York: Academic.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G., and Turner, M. (2002). The Way we Think. New York: Basic Books.
Gibbs, R. (1994). The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language, and Understanding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gibbs, R., and Gibbs, R. J. (1989). Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 4: 145–58.
Gibbs, R., and Moise, J. F. (1997). Cognition 62: 51–74.
Giora, R. (1997). Cognitive Linguistics 7: 183–206.
Glucksberg, S. (1998). Current Directions in Psychological Science 7: 39–43.
Grice, H. (1975). In P. C. J. Morgan (ed.), Syntax and Semantics: Volume 3, Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press.
Hagoort, P., Brown, C, and Groothusen, J. (1993). Language and Cognitive Processes 8: 439–83.
Hahne, A. and Frederici, A. D. (1999). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11:194–205.
Hillyard, S., and Kutas, M. (1983). Annual Review of Psychology 34: 33–61.
Holcomb, P. J. (1988). Brain and Language 35: 66–85.
Holcomb, P., and Neville, H. (1990). Language and Cognitive Processes 5: 281–312.
Holcomb, P., and Neville, H. (1991). Psychobiology 19: 286–300.
King, J. W., and Kutas, M. (1998). Neuroscience Letters 244: 61–4.
King, J. W., and Kutas, M. (1995). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 7: 376–395.
Kluender, R., and Kutas, M. (1993). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 5: 196–214.
Kutas, M. (1997). Psychophysiology 34: 383–98.
Kutas, M., Federmeier, K., Coulson, S., King, J. W., and Muente, T. F. (2000a). In J. T. Caccioppo, L. G. Tassinary and G. G. Berntson (eds), Handbook of Psychophysiology: 576–601. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kutas, M., Federmeier, K. D., Coulson, S., King, J. W., and Muente, T. F. (2000b). In John T. Cacioppo, Louis G. Tassinary et al. (eds), Handbook of Psychophysiology (2nd edn): xiii, 1039. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kutas, M., and Hillyard, S. (1980). Science 207: 203–5.
Kutas, M., Lindamood, T. E., and Hillyard, S. (1984). In S. K. J. Requin (eds), Preparatory States and Processes: 217–37. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kutas, M., McCarthy, G., and Donchin, E. (1977). Science 197: 792–7.
Kutas, M., Van Petten, C, and Besson, M. (1988). Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 69: 218–33.
Magliero, A., Bashore, T. R., Coles, M. G. H., and Donchin, E. (1984). Psychophysiology 21: 171–86.
Marr, D. (1982). Vision. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
McCarthy, G. D. (1981). Science 211: 77–80.
Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., and Friederici, A. D. (1995). Memory and Cognition 23: 477–94.
Mueller, H., King, J. W., and Kutas, M. (1997). Brain Research: Cognitive Brain Research 5: 192–203.
Muente, T., Schiltz, K., and Kutas, M. (1998). Nature 395: 71–3.
Neville, H., Mills, D., and Lawson, D. (1992). Cerebral Cortex 2: 244–58.
Neville, R, Nicol, J., Barss, A., Förster, K. I., and Garrett, M. F. (1991). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 151–65.
Osterhout, L., and Holcomb, P. (1992). Journal of Memory and Language 31: 785–804.
Osterhout, L., Bersick, M., and McKinnon, R. (1997). Biological Psychology 46: 143–68.
Pynte, J., Besson, M., Robichon, F., and Poli, J. (1996). Brain and Language 55: 293–316.
Recanati, F. (1989). Mind and Language 4: 295–329.
Reddy, M. (1979). In A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and Thought 284–324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ritter, W., Simpson, R., and Vaughan, H. G. (1983). Psychophysiology 20: 168–79.
Rugg, M. (1985). Psychophysiology 22: 642–7.
Rugg, M. D., and Coles, M. G. H. (eds). (1995). Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-Related Brain Potentials and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M. E., and Halgren, E. (1989). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 50–60.
Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
St George, M., Mannes, S., and Hoffman, J. E. (1994). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 6: 70–83.
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., and Friederici, A. D. (1999). Nature Neuroscience2: 438–53.
Van Berkum, J., Hagoort, P., and Brown, C. (1999). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11: 657–71.
Van Petten, C., and Kutas, M. (1991). Memory and Cognition 19: 95–112.
Van Petten, C., Coulson, S., Plante, E., Rubin, S., and Parks, M. (1999). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25: 394–417.
Van Petten, C., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., and McIsaac, H. (1991a). Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 3: 131–50.
Zigmond, M., Bloom, F. E., Landis, S. E., Roberts, J. L., and Squire, L. R. (1999). Fundamental Neuroscience. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Coulson, S. (2004). Electrophysiology and Pragmatic Language Comprehension. In: Noveck, I.A., Sperber, D. (eds) Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-0351-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52412-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Language & Linguistics CollectionEducation (R0)