Skip to main content

Pragmatic Inferences Related to Logical Terms

  • Chapter
Experimental Pragmatics

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition ((PSPLC))

Abstract

Paul Grice was concerned with the way logical terms such as some, or and and take on extralogical meanings in conversational contexts. To take one example, Grice (1989) described or as having a weak word meaning identical to formal logic’s inclusive disjunction (which is false only in the case where both disjuncts are) but as conveying in conversation a speaker’s stronger meaning corresponding to the exclusive disjunction (which is false in the case where both disjuncts are false and where both are true). Grice used the term implicature to describe the pragmatic inference linking word meanings to speaker’s meanings and laid the foundations for nearly all of the linguistic-pragmatic studies found in this volume.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bach, K. (1994) Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bookheimer, S. (2002). Functional MRI of language: New approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25: 151–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bott, L., and Noveck, I. A. (in press). Some utterances are underinformative: The onset and time course of scalar inferences. Journal of Memory and Language.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braine, M. D., and Rumain, B. (1981). Development of comprehension of ‘or’: Evidence for a sequence of competencies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 31(1): 46–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (1996). Enrichment and loosening: Complementary processes in deriving the proposition expressed. In UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8: 61–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doitchinov, S. (2004). Naturalistic and experimental data in language acquisition: The case of epistemic terms. Proceedings from the International Conference on Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives (in Tuebingen): 36–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. S. B., and Newstead, S. E. (1980). A study of disjunctive reasoning. Psychological Research 41(4): 373–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, A., Scrafton, S., Duckworth, A., and Handley, S. J. (in press). The story of some: Everyday pragmatic inference by children and adults. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel, V., and Dolan, R. J. (2003). Explaining modulation of reasoning by belief. Cognition 87(1): B11–B22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guasti, M., Chierchia, G., Crain, S., Foppolo, F., Gualmini, A., and Meroni, L. (2003). Why children and adults sometimes (but not always) compute implicatures. Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, H. J., Muente, T. F., and Kutas, M. (1998). Context effects in a category verification task as assessed by event-related brain potential (ERP) measures. Biological Psychology 47(2): 121–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. R. (1973). Greek Grice: A Brief Survey of Proto-Conversational Rules in the History of Logic. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koechlin, E., Basso, G., Pietrini, P., Panzer, S., and Grafman, J. (1999). The role of the anterior prefrontal cortex in human cognition. Nature 399: 148–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutas, M., and Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207: 203–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meroni, L., Gualmini, A., and Crain, S. (2001). Conversational Implicatures and Computational Complexity in Child Language. Paper presented at the LSA, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. E. (1970). On the representation and retrieval of stored semantic information. Cognitive Psychology 1: 242–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A. (2001). When children are more logical than adults: Experimental investigations of scalar implicature. Cognition 78(2): 165–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A., and Chevaux, F. (2001). The Pragmatic Development of and. Paper presented at the BUCLD, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A., Chevaux, F., and Bott, L. (2004). Semantic and then pragmatic influences in enriching the meaning of and. Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A., Chierchia, G., Chevaux, F., Guelminger, R., and Sylvestre, E. (2002). Linguistic-pragmatic factors in interpreting disjunctions. Thinking and Reasoning 8(4): 297–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A., Goel, V., and Smith, K. W. (in press). The neural basis of conditional reasoning with arbitrary content. Cortex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I. A., Ho, S., and Sera, M. (1996). Children’s understanding of epistemic modals. Journal of Child Language 23(3): 621–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I.A., and Posada, A. (2003). Characterizing the time course of an implicature: An evoked potentials study. Brain and Language 85: 203–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, A., and Musolino, J. (2003). Scalar implicatures: Experiments at the semantics-pragmatics interface. Cognition 86(3): 253–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papafragou, A., and Tantalou, N. (in press). Children’s computation of implicatures. Language Acquisition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, S. G. (1973). Comprehension of language connectives and propositional logical relationships. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 16(2): 278–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouscoulous, N., Noveck, I. A., Politzer, G., and Bastide, A. (2004). Evidence of the production of scalar implicatures in young children. Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. J. (1975). Quantification and semantic memory. Cognitive Psychology 7(3): 307–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. L. (1980). Quantifiers and question answering in young children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 30(2): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., and Wilson, D. (1986/1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1979). Developmental patterns in the encoding and combination of logical connectives. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 28(3): 469–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Noveck, I.A. (2004). Pragmatic Inferences Related to Logical Terms. In: Noveck, I.A., Sperber, D. (eds) Experimental Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230524125_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics