Advertisement

The Material Culture of the Crusades

  • Maria Georgopoulou
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

The term ‘material culture’ defies the well established categories of art history and archaeology. Institutionally the term and the field of study that it has generated since the 1980s imply connections with anthropology, archaeology, the history of collecting and museums, and an interdisciplinary approach.1 Within the strict parameters of the term, material culture stands as a counterpart to art as it studies the products of the industrial arts; it is interested on the banal and the quotidian as opposed to High Art. Rather than thinking about the hand of a master, the study of material culture begs for understanding of the organization of the so-called industrial arts, the collective lives of craftsmen, the modes of production and the ways in which the artefacts reached the market and the home. In short, material culture deals with commodities rather than Art.

Keywords

Material Culture Thirteenth Century British Library Muslim State Holy Site 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Reading Material Culture: Structuralism, Hermeneutics, and Post-structuralism, ed. C. Tilley (Oxford and Cambridge, Mass., 1990); The Meanings of Things: Material Culture and Ayrnbolic Expression, ed. I. Hodder (London and Boston, 1989); Approaches to Material Culture: Research for Historical Archaeologists: a Reader from Historical Archaeology, ed. D. R. Brauner (California, Penn., 2000); Art and Artifacts: Essays in Material Culture and Museum Studies in Honor ofJane Powell Dwyer, ed. D. Juli (Providence, R.I., 1992); Experiencing Material Culture in the Western World, ed. S. M. Pearce (London and Washington, DC, 1997); History from Things: Essays on Material Culture, ed. S. Lubar and W. D. Kingery (Washington, DC, c. 1993); The Material Culture Reader, ed. V. Buchli (Oxford and New York, 2002).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. N. Johns, ‘Excavations at Pilgrims’ Castle, ‘Atlit (1932); The Ancient Tell and the Outer Defences of the Castle’, Quarterly of the Dept. of Antiquities of Palestine, 3 (1934), 152–64; A. Boas, ‘Islamic and Crusader Pottery (c. 640- 1265) from the Crusader City (Area TP/4)’, in Caesarea Papers: Stratons tower, Herods Harbour, and Roman and Byzantine Caesarea: Including the Papers given at a Symposium held … on 25–28 March, 1988, ed. R. L. Vann (Ann Arbor, 1992); King Herods Dream: Caesarea on the Sea, ed. K. Holum et al. (New York and London, 1988).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. J. Boas, Crusader Archaeology: The Material Culture of the Latin East (London and New York, 1999); R. Ellenblum, Frankish Rural Settlement in the Latin Kingdom ofJerusalem (Cambridge, 1998); R. Ellenblum, ‘Construction Methods in Frankish Rural Settlements’, in The Horns ofHattin, ed. B. Z. Kedar (Jerusalem, 1992), pp. 168–89; D. Pringle, ‘Medieval Pottery from Caesarea’, Levant, 17 (1985); E. Stern, ‘Excavations of the Courthouse Site at Akko: The Pottery of the Crusader and Ottoman Periods’, Atiqot, 31 (1997).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    For an overview of the establishment and evolution of the field see: J. Folda, The Art of the Crusaders in the Holy Land, 1098–1187 (New York, 1995); J. Folda, ‘The Saint Marina Icon. “Maniera greca”, “Lingua franca” or “Crusader Art”?’ in Four Icons in the Mesnil Collection, ed. B. Davezac (Houston, 1992).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The field has been dominated by studies in architecture, scuplture and manuscript illumination, the most important of which are: P. Deschamps, ‘La sculpture francaise en Palestine et en Syrie a l’epoque des croisades’, Monuments etMemoires (fondation Piot), 31 (1930); C. Enlart, Les Monuments des croises dans le royaume de Jerusalem; architecture religieuse et civile (Paris, 1925); H. Buchthal, Miniature Painting in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (Oxford, 1957); J. Folda, CrusaderManuscriptlllumination atSaintJean dAcre, 1275–1291 (Princeton, 1976); K. Weitzmann, ‘Icon Painting in the Crusader Kingdom’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 20 (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    The most vocal studies following this trend are: L.-A. Hunt, ‘Art and Colonialism: The Mosaics of the Church of the Nativity in Bethlehem (1169) and the Problem of “Crusader” Art’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 45 (1991), 69–85;Google Scholar
  7. A. Weyl Carr, ‘Art in the Court of the Lusignan in Cyprus’, in Cyprus and the Crusades, ed. N. Coureas and J. Riley-Smith (Nicosia, 1995), pp. 239–74; M. Georgopoulou, ‘Orientalism and Crusader Art: Constructing a New Canon’, Medieval Encounters: Jewish, Christian and Muslim Culture in Confluence and Dialogue, 5 (1999), 289–321; B. Zeitler, ‘“Sinful Sons, Falsifiers of the Christian Faith”: The Depiction of Muslims in a “Crusader” Manuscript’, Mediterranean Historical Review, 12 (1997), 25–50.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Hunt, ‘Art and Colonialism’; J. Folda, ‘Crusader Frescoes at Crac des Chevaliers and Marqab Castle’, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, 36 (1982), 177–210; H. Kennedy, Crusader Castles (Cambridge and New York, 1994); W. Muller-Wiener, Castles of the Crusaders (New York, 1966); E. G. Rey, Etude sur les monuments de larchitecture militaire des croises en Syrie et dans 1’ile de Chypre, Collection de documents inedits sur lhistoire de France. Premiere serie, Histoire politique (Paris, 1871).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    G. Vikan, Byzantine Pilgrimage Art, Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Collection Publications, 5 (Washington, DC, 1982).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    For examples of crusader ampullae see: Folda, Art of the Crusaders, pp. 294–7; D. Syon, ‘Souvenirs from the Holy Land: A Crusader Workshop of Lead Ampullae from Acre’, in Knights of the Holy Land: The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, ed. Silvia Rozenberg (Jerusalem, 1999), pp. 110–15.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    D. H. Weiss, ‘Biblical History and Medieval Historiography: Rationalizing Strategies in Crusader Art’, Modern Language Notes, 108 (1993), 710–37; D. H. Weiss, Art and Crusade in the age of Saint Louis (Cambridge and New York, 1998).Google Scholar
  12. 16.
    D. Jacoby, ‘Knightly Values and Class Consciousness in the Crusader States of the Eastern Mediterranean’, Mediterranean Historical Review, 1 (1986), 158–86; V. Francois, ‘Une Illustration des Romans courtois. La vaisselle a table chypriote sous l’occupation franque’, Cahier du Centre dEtudes Chypriotes, 29 (1999).Google Scholar
  13. 17.
    D. Papanikola-Bakirtzis, ‘Cypriot Medieval Glazed Pottery: Answers and Questions’, in The Sweet Land of Cyprus. Papers Given at the Twenty-Fifth Jubilee Symposium ofByzantine Studies, Birmingham, March 1991, ed. A. A. M. Biyer and G. S. Georghallides (Nicosia and Birmingham, England, 1993), pp. 115–30; D. Papanikola-Bakirtzis, ‘La céramique a glacure dans la Chypre du Moyen-Age’, in La France aux portes de lOrient Chypre XIleme-XVerne siecle, ed. J. CharlesGaffiot (Paris, 1991).Google Scholar
  14. 18.
    See note 6 above and B. Zeitler, ‘Cross-cultural interpretations of imagery in the Middle Ages’, Art Bulletin, 76 (1994), 680–94; B. Zeitler, ‘Two Iconostasis Beams from Mount Sinai: Object Lessons in Crusader Art’, in Ikonostas: proiskhozhdenie, razvitie, simvolika, ed. A. Lidov (Moscow, 2000).Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    Published by Kurt Weitzmann, The Icon (London, 1982), p. 220.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    S. E. J. Gerstel, ‘Art and Identity in the Medieval Morea’, in The Crusades from the Perspective of Byzantium and the Muslim World, ed. A. E. Laiou and R. P. Mottahedeh (Washington, DC, 2001), pp. 264–85, esp. pp. 268–73.Google Scholar
  17. 21.
    A. Cutler, ‘Misapprehensions and Misgivings: Byzantine Art and the West in the Twelfth and Thirteenth Centuries’, in Mediaevalia, 7 (1984), 51; reprinted in Byzantium, Italy and the North: Papers on Cultural Relations (London, 2000), article XVII. See also Byzantium: Faith and Power: 1261–1557, ed. H. Evans (New Haven and London, 2004).Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    Among the many influential works of these two scholars are: S. D. Goitein, A Mediterranean society; The Jewish Communities of the Arab World as Portrayed in the Documents of the Cairo Geniza, 6 vols (Berkeley, 1967-); and R. S. Lopez, The Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, 950–1350 (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971).Google Scholar
  19. 23.
    N. Ziadeh, Damascus Under the Mamluks (Norman, Okla., 1964), pp. 60, 63 and 86.Google Scholar
  20. 24.
    Ziadeh, Urban Life in Syria, p. 31.Google Scholar
  21. 25.
    For an example see Knights of the Holy Land, ed. Rozenberg, p. 265; see also S. Patitucci Uggeri, ‘La protomaiolica del Mediterraneo orientale in rapporto ai centri di produzione italiani’, Corso di cultura sullarte ravennate e bizantina, 32 (1985), 337–402; D. Pringle, ‘Pottery as Evidence for Trade in the Crusader States’, I comuni italiani nel regno crociato di Gerusalemme. Atti del Colloquio ‘The Italian Communes in the Crusading Kingdom of Jerusalem’, Jerusalem, May 24 — May 28, 1984 (Genoa, 1986), pp. 449–76; D. Pringle, ‘Some more Protomaiolica from Athlit (Pilgrims’ Castle) and a Discussion of its Distribution in the Levant’, Levant, 14 (1982), 104–17; A. J. Boas, ‘The Import of Western Ceramics to the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem’, Israel Exploration Journal, 44 (1994), 102–22; D. B. Whitehouse, ‘Proto-maiolica’, Faenza, 66 (1980), 77–89; V. Francois, ‘Sur la circulation des céramiques byzantines en Méditerranée orientale et occidentale’, in La céramique médiévale en Mediterranee (Aix-enProvence, 1997), p. 235; Byzantine Glazed Ceramics. The Art of Sgraffito, ed. D. Bakirtzi-Papanikola (Athens, 1999); T. S. Mackay, ‘More Byzantine and Frankish Pottery from Corinth’, Hesperia, 36 (1967), 249–320; E. Stern, ‘Export to the Latin East of Cypriot Manufactured Glazed Pottery in the TwelfthThirteenth Century’, in Cyprus and the Crusades, ed. Coureas and Riley-Smith, pp. 325–35; C. I. Williams, ‘Frankish Corinth: An Overview’, in Proceedings for the Centennial of the Corinth Excavation, Dec. 5–7, 1996 (2003), pp. 223–81.Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    Lopez, Commercial Revolution of the Middle Ages, p. 96; and F. Balducci Pegolotti, La pratica della mercatura, ed. A. Evans (Cambridge, Mass., 1936); D. Jacoby, ‘A Venetian Manual of Commercial Practice from Crusader Acre’, in Comuni italiani nel regno crociato di Gerusalemme, ed. G. Airaldi and B. Kedar (Genoa, 1986), pp. 403–28; R. Lopez and G. Airaldi, ‘Il piu antico manuale italiano di pratica della mercatura’, Miscellanea di studi storici, 2, Fonti e Studi 38 (Genoa, 1983), pp. 99–117.Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    C. B. Kritsas, ‘To byzantinon nauagion Pelagonnesou-Alonnesou’ [The Byzantine Shipwreck of Pelagonnesos-Alonnesos]’, Athens Annals ofArchaeology, 4 (1971); G. F. Bass, ‘The Shipwreck at Serce Limani, Turkey’, Archaeology, 32 (1979), 36–43; and G. F. Bass, J. R. Steffy and F. H. van Doorninck, Jr, ‘Excavation of an 11th-Century Shipwreck at Serce Limani, Turkey’, National Geographic Society Research Reports, 17 (1984), 161–82.Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    L.-A. Hunt, Byzantium, Eastern Christendom and Islam: Art at the Crossroads of the Medieval Mediterranean, 2 vols (London, 1998); R. Nelson, ‘An Icon at Mount Sinai and Christian Painting in Muslim Egypt during the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries’, Art Bulletin, 65 (1983), 201–18; E. Dodd, The Frescoes of Mar Musa al-Habashi: a Study in Medieval Painting in Syria (Toronto, 2001); A. Weyl Carr, ‘The Mural Paintings of Abu Ghosh and the Patronage of Manuel Comnenus in the Holy Land’, in Crusader Art in the Twelfth Century, ed. J. Folda (Oxford, 1982), pp. 215–44.Google Scholar
  25. 29.
    The seal is illustrated in Y. Friedman, ‘Pilgrims in the Shadow of the Crusader Kingdom’, in Rozenberg, Knights of the Holy Land, p. 108, fig. 3, and H. E. Mayer, Das Siegeiwesen in der Kreuzfahrstaaten (Munich, 1978), pl. 2, figs 17–18.Google Scholar
  26. 30.
    C. J. Lamm, Oriental Glass of Mediaeval Date found in Sweden and the early history of lustre-painting (Stockholm, 1941), p. 63; J. Allan and W. Henderson, ‘Enamels on Ayyubid and Mamluk Glass Fragments’, Archaeomaterials, 4 (1990).Google Scholar
  27. 31.
    E. Atil, Renaissance of Islam. The Art of the Mamluks (Washington, DC, 1981), p. 126; and Georgopoulou, ‘Orientalism and Crusader Art’.Google Scholar
  28. 32.
    D. S. Rice, ‘Inlaid Brasses From the Workshop of Ahmad al-Dhaki al-Mawsili’, Ars Orientalis, 2 (1957), 283–4 and n. 9.Google Scholar
  29. 33.
    J. Leroy, Les manuscripts syriaques a peintures conserves dans les bibliotheques dEurope et dOrient (Paris, 1964), p. 259, pl. 60, fig. 2; p. 335, pls. 111–13; pl. 130, 134/2, and 135/2; J. Leroy, Les manuscripts coptes et coptes-arabes illustres (Paris, 1974), p. 126, pl. 54, fig. 1.Google Scholar
  30. 34.
    Goitein, Mediterranean Society, vol. 1, pp. 99–110 and vol. 2, pp. 289–96; N. A. Ziadeh, Urban Life in Syria Under the Early Mamluks (Beirut, 1953).Google Scholar
  31. 35.
    R. Katzenstein and G. Lowry, ‘Christian Themes in Thirteenth-Century Islamic Metalwork’, Muqamas, 1 (1983), 53–68; E. Baer, Ayyubid Metalwork with Christian Images (Leiden, 1989).Google Scholar
  32. 36.
    Georgopoulou, Burning Incense in the Islamic and Byzantine Near East (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  33. 37.
    A. Carr Weyl, ‘Art in the Court of the Lusignan Kings’, in Cyprus and the Crusades, ed. Coureas and Riley-Smith, pp. 239–74.Google Scholar
  34. 38.
    L. T. Schneider, ‘The Freer Canteen’, Ars Orientalis, 9 (1973), 137–56.Google Scholar
  35. 40.
    Lamm, Oriental Glass ofMedieval Date; R. Smidt, Das Glas (Berlin and Leipzig, 1922); I. Krueger, ‘Research in Medieval Glass. Where Are We Standing Now?’, in Annales du 13e Congres de lAssociation Internationale de lHistoire du Uerre. Pays Bas 28 aout1 septembre 1995 (Lochem, 1996), pp. 283–4.Google Scholar
  36. 41.
    S. Carboni, ‘Oggetti decorati a smalto di influsso islamico nella vetraria muranese: tecnica e forma’, in Arte Veneziana e arte Islamica. Atti del primo simposio internazionale sullarte veneziana e larte islamica. Venice, Ateneo Veneto 1986, ed. E. J. Grube (Venice, 1989), p. 153; M. Verita, ‘Analytical Investigation of European Enameled Beakers of the 13th and 14th centuries’, Journal of Glass Studies, 37 (1995), 83–4.Google Scholar
  37. 42.
    D. Pringle, ‘Some Approaches to the Study of Crusader Masonry Marks in Palestine’, Levant, 13 (1981), 173–99, esp. 176–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Georgopoulou

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations