Crusading Warfare

  • John France
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

In recent years much attention has been devoted to the military history of the crusades. This recent research, however, has highlighted the problems posed by the source material, problems that earlier researchers were often unaware of or simply overlooked. Contemporary chronicles record war, but explain very little about it. This means that a great volume of sources, western and Oriental, has to be examined and consideration has to be given to record evidence, letters, artefacts, inscriptions and archaeological remains. The volume of material is the greater because crusading was always very diverse and involved theatres of operation in northern and eastern Europe as well as the Eastern Mediterranean. Part of the fascination of the crusades in the Eastern Mediterranean is the contrasting styles of war which clashed in the Middle East. Given the diversity of the subject, students approaching crusading warfare should familiarize themselves not only with the historiography but also with the serious problems which face researchers in this area, and hence this chapter offers a multifaceted approach. In the first section there is a survey of recent work on crusading warfare. The second section discusses the problems posed by the source material. In the third section an effort is made to explain why styles of war were so very different.

Keywords

Europe Coherence Syria Egypt Defend 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    There is a bibliography by E. U. Crosby, Medieval Warfare. A Bibliographical Guide (New York, 2000), and see also J. France, ‘Recent Writing on Medieval Warfare from the Fall of Rome to c.1300’, Journal ofMilitaryHistory, 65 (2001), 441–73; J. France, Western Warfare in the Age of the Crusades, 1000–1300 (London, 1999); H. Nicholson, Medieval Warfare: Theory and Practice of War in Europe, 300–1500 (Basingstoke, 2004); J. F. Verbruggen, The Art of Warfare in Western Europe during the Middle Ages. From the Eighth Century to 1340, trans. S. Willard and R. W. Southern (Woodbridge, 1997).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. C. Small, Crusading Warfare, 1097–1193, 2nd edn, ed. C. Marshall (Cambridge, 1995); C. Marshall, Warfare in the Latin East 1192–1291 (Cambridge, 1992); P. W. Edbury, ‘Warfare in the Latin East’, in Medieval Warfare. A History, ed. M. Keen (Oxford, 1999), pp. 89–112; N. Housley, Religious Warfare in Europe, 1400–1536 (Oxford, 2002).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. S. Asbridge, The First Crusade (London, 2004); J. France, Victory in the East. A Military History of the First Crusade (Cambridge, 1994); D. E. Queller, The Fourth Crusade (Leicester, 1978); T. F. Madden, Enrico Dandolo and the Rise of Venice (Baltimore, 2003); J. M. Powell, Anatomy of a Crusade, 1213–1221 (Philadelphia, 1986); T. C. van Cleve, The Emperor Frederick II ofHohenstaufen, Immutator Mundi (Oxford, 1972); J. Richard, Saint Louis, ed. S. Lloyd from a 1983 French original (Cambridge, 1992).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    John Gillingham is the chief authority on Richard and the Third Crusade, especially in his ‘Richard I and the Science of War in the Middle Ages’, in War and Government in the Middle Ages, ed. J. Gillingham and J. C. Holt (Woodbridge, 1984), pp. 78–91, and Richard Coeur de Lion: Kingship, Chivalry and War in the Twelfth Century (London, 1994). For another view of Richard see R. V. Turner, The Reign of Richard Lionheart, Ruler of the Angevin Empire (Harlow, 2000). For a vigorous debate on Richard as a soldier see the opposing views of J. O. Prestwich, ‘Richard Coeur de Lion: rex bellicosus’, in Riccardo Cuor di Leone nella storia e nella leggenda (Rome, 1981) and J. Gillingham, ‘Conquering Kings: Some Twelfth Century Reflections on Henry II and Richard I’, in Warriors and Churchmen in the High Middle Ages: Essays Presented to Karl Leyser, ed. T. Reuter (London, 1992), pp. 163–78.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T. S. Asbridge, ‘The Significance and Causes of the Battle of the Field of Blood’, Journal ofMedieval History, 23 (1997), 301–16; A. J. Forey, ‘The Failure of the Siege of Damascus in 1148’, Journal ofMedieval History, 10 (1984), 13–23; M. Hoch, ‘The Choice of Damascus as the Objective of the Second Crusade’, in Autour de la premiere croisade: actes du Colloque de la Society for the Study of the Crusades and the Latin East: Clermont-Ferrand, 22–25 juin 1995, ed. M. Balard (Paris, 1996), pp. 359–70; M. Barber, ‘Frontier Warfare in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem: the Campaign of Jacob’s Ford, 1178–79’, in The Crusades and their Sources: Essays Presented to Bernard Hamilton, ed. J. France and W. G. Zajac (Aldershot, 1998); B. Z. Kedar, ‘The Battle of Hattin Revisited’, in The Horns of Hattin, ed. B. Z. Kedar Uerusalem, 1992), pp. 190–207; A. S. Atiya, The Crusade of Nicopolis (London, 1934).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    C. Coulson, ‘Cultural Realities and Reappraisals in English Castle-study’, Journal of Medieval History, 22 (1996), 171–207; D. Pringle, The Red Tower (London, 1986); R. Ellenblum, ‘Frankish Castle-Building in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem’, in Knights of the Holy Land. The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem, ed. S. Rozenberg Uerusalem, 1999), pp. 142–7; A. J. Taylor, The Kings Works in Wales 1277–1330 (London, 1974); H. Kennedy, Crusader Castles (Cambridge, 1995); R. Rogers, Latin Siege Warfare in the Twelfth Century (Oxford, 1997).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. H. Pryor, Geography, Technology and War. Studies in the Maritime History of the Mediterranean 649–1571 (Cambridge, 1992); J. H. Pryor, ‘The Venetian Fleet for the Fourth Crusade and the Diversion of the Crusade to Constantinople’, in The Experience of Crusading, vol. 1: Western Approaches, ed. M. Bull and N. Housley (Cambridge, 2003), pp. 103–26; J. H. Pryor, “Water, water everywhere, Nor any drop to drink.” Water Supplies for the Fleets on the First Crusade’, in Dei gesta per Francos. Etudes sur les croisades dédiées a Jean Richard — Crusade Studies in Honour of Jean Richard, ed. M. Balard, B. Z. Kedar and J. RileySmith (Aldershot, 2001), pp. 21–8; S. Rose, Medieval Naval Warfare 1000–1500 (London, 2002); A. Ehrenkreutz, ‘The Place of Saladin in the Naval History of the Mediterranean Sea in the Middle Ages’, Journal of the American Oriental Society, 75 (1955), 100–16.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D. Nicolle, Arms and Armour of the Crusading Era 1050–1350, 2 vols (New York, 1988).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    War, Technology and Society in the Middle East, ed. V. J. 1’arry and M. E. Yapp (London, 1975); Y. Lev, State and Society in Fatimid Egypt (Leiden, 1991); H. A. R. Gibb, ‘The Armies of Saladin’, in Studies in the Civilization ofIslam, ed. S. J. Shaw and W. R. Polk (New Haven, 1982), pp. 74–90; R. S. Humphreys, From Saladin to the Mongols (Albany, 1977); C. R. Bowlus, ‘Tactical and Strategic Weaknesses of Horse-archers on the Eve of the First Crusade’, in Autour de la premiere croisade, ed. Balard, pp. 159–66; Asbridge, ‘Significance and Causes of the Battle of the Field of Blood’; A. G. C. Savvides, ‘Late Byzantine and Crusader Historiographers on Turkish Mercenaries in Greek and Latin Armies. The Turcopoles/Tourkopoloi’, in The Making of Byzantine History. Essays Dedicated to D. M. Nicol, ed. R. Beaton and C. Roueché (Aldershot, 1993), pp. 122–36; Y. Harari, ‘The Military Role of the Frankish Turcopoles’, Mediterranean History Review, 12 (1997), 75–116.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. France, ‘Crusading Warfare and its Adaptation to Eastern Conditions in the Twelfth Century’, MediterraneanHistoryReview, 15 (2000), 49–66; R. Ellenblum, Frankish Rural Settlement in the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem (Cambridge, 1998).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Song of Roland, trans. G. Burgess (Harmondsworth, 1990); The Song of William of Orange, in William Count of Orange. Four Old French Epics, ed. G. Price et al. (Dent, 1975), p. 195. On the value of chivalric literature to the study of war see especially Nicholson, Medieval Warfare. Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anonymous, Gesta Francorum et aliorum Hierosolimitanorum, ed. R. Hill (Edinburgh, 1962), p. 21.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Epistulae et chartae ad historiam primi belli sacri spectantes: Die Kreuzzugsbriefe aus den Jahren 1088–1100, ed. H. Hagenmeyer (Innsbruck, 1902), translated into English in The First Crusade, ed. A. C. Krey (Gloucester, Mass., 1958).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Raymond of Aguilers, Liber, ed. J. H. and L. L. Hill (Paris, 1969).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Fulcher of Chartres, Historia Hierosoloyrnitana, ed. H. Hagenmeyer (Heidelberg, 1913). His work continues the story of the kingdom down to 1127.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guibert de Nogent, Deigesta perFrancos etcinq autres textes, ed. R. B. C. Huygens, Corpus Christianorum: Continuatio mediaevalis 127A (Turnhout, 1996). For the view of the Gesta as the work of a simple knight, see the introduction to her edition by R. Hill, pp. ix-xvi; C. Morris, ‘The Gesta Francorum as Narrative History’, Reading Medieval Studies, 19 (1993), 55–71, contests this view sharply, while K. B. Wolf, ‘Crusade and Narrative: Bohemond and the Gesta Francorum’, Journal of Medieval History, 17 (1991), 207–16, argues for the subtlety of the storytelling. J. France, ’The Anonymous Gesta Francorum, the Historia Francorum qui ceperunt Iherusalem of Raymond of Aguilers and the Historia de Hierosolymitano Itinere of Peter Tudebode: An Analysis of the Textual Relationship between Primary Sources for the First Crusade’, in The Crusades and their Sources. Essays Presented to Bernard Hamilton, ed. J. France and W. G. Zajac (Aldershot, 1998), pp. 39–70, argues that the present text is the result of later editing.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roberti monachi Historia Iherosolimitana, Recueil des historiens des croisades, ed. Academie des Inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (Paris, 1841–1906), Historiens Occidentaux [henceforth cited as RHC Occ.] vol. 3, pp. 717–882: here p. 731.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. France, ‘The Fall of Antioch during the First Crusade’, in Dei Gesta per Francos, ed. Balard et al., pp. 13–20, has suggested that during this period the crusaders made a truce with Antioch which, after the fall of Jerusalem, chroniclers preferred to delete from the record.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Albert of Aachen, Alberti Aquensis Historia Hierosolymitana, in RHC Occ., vol. 4, pp. 265–713. A new edition with English translation is being prepared by S. B. Edgington, to whom I owe thanks for giving me access to her work and her ideas.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    S. Duparc Quioc, in her edition of La Chanson dAntioche, 2 vols (Paris, 1976–8), takes the view that the chanson is a revised version of an early twelfth-century song, but it has been suggested by R. F. Cook, in Chanson dAntioche, chansons de geste: le cycle de la croisade est-il epique? (Amsterdam, 1980), that the whole work was written in the later twelfth century. See the comments of S. B. Edgington, ‘The First Crusade: Reviewing the Evidence’, in The First Crusade: Origins and Irnpact, ed. J. Phillips (Manchester, 1997), pp. 62–3.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Odo of Deuil, De Profectione Ludovici VII in orientem, ed. V. G. Berry (New York, 1947), and see J. France, ‘Logistics and the Second Crusade’ (forthcoming); E. Siberry, Criticism of Crusading 1095–1274 (Oxford, 1985); J. France, ‘Thinking about Crusader Strategy’ (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pierre Dubois, The Recovery of the Holy Land, ed. W. I. Brandt (New York, 1956). There is no good translation of Sanudo but there is a useful study by C. J. Tyerman, ‘Marino Sanudo Torsello and the Lost Crusade: Lobbying in the fourteenth century’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 32 (1982), 57–73.Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    Walter the Chancellor, The Antiochene Wars, ed. and trans. T. S. Asbridge and S. B. Edgington (Aldershot, 1999).Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    William of Tyre, Chronicon, ed. R. B. C. Huygens, 2 vols, Corpus Christianorum: continuatio mediaevalis, 63–63A (Turnhout, 1986); E. A. Babcock and A. C. Krey, trans, A History of the Deeds Done Beyond the Sea, 2 vols (New York, 1943).Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    There is a brilliant analysis of the factional struggle in Jerusalem before 1187 by P. W. Edbury, ‘Propaganda and Faction in the Kingdom of Jerusalem: The Background to Hattin’, in Crusaders and Muslims in Twelfth-Century Syria, ed. M. Shatzmiller (Leiden, 1993), pp. 173–89. For the difficulty of establishing events see Kedar, ‘Battle of Hattin Revisited’. Some of the texts and useful further references are translated into English by P. W. Edbury, The Conquest of Jerusalem and the Third Crusade (Aldershot, 1996).Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    W. C. Jordan, Louis IX and the Challenge of the Crusade. A Study in Rulership (Princeton, 1979), pp. 65–104.Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    Ibn al-Qalanisi, Damascus Chronicle of the Crusades ed. A. R. Gibb (Luzac, 1932); Kemal al-Din, ‘Chronicle of Aleppo’, in RHC Historiens Orientaux, ed. Académie des inscriptions et Belles-Lettres (Paris, 1872–1906), vol. 3.Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    Usama, An Arab-Syrian Gentleman and Warrior in the Period of the Crusades, ed. P. K. Hitti (New York, 1929).Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    For an early instance of jihad being advocated against the invaders see N. Christie and D. Gerish, ‘Parallel Preachings: Urban II and al-Sulami’, Al-Masaq, 15 (2003), 139–48. N. Christie is preparing an edition of this early text.Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    There is a useful introduction to these and other texts in English in Arab Historians of the Crusades, ed. F. Gabrieli (New York, 1989).Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    G. Tantum, ‘Muslim Warfare. A Study of a Medieval Muslim Treatise on the Art of War’, in Islamic Arms and Armour, ed. R. Elgood (London, 1979), pp. 187–201; G. Scanlon, A Muslim Manual of War (Cairo, 1961).Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    C. Hillenbrand, The Crusades. Islamic Perspectives (Edinburgh, 2000).Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    C. Cahen, ‘Un traite d’armurerie compose pour Saladin’, Bulletin d’études orientales de lInstitut francais de Damas, 12 (1947/48), 103–63.Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    The Cilician Kingdom ofArmenia, ed. T. S. R. Boase (Edinburgh, 1978).Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Michael the Syrian, Chronique, ed. J. B. Chabot (Brussels, 1963, reprint of 1899–1910 original).Google Scholar
  36. 38.
    See Ellenblum, Frankish Rural Settlement. Google Scholar
  37. 39.
    Gislebertus Hanoniensis, Chronicon, ed. L. Vanderkindere (Brussels, 1904); an English translation by Laura Napran is in preparation.Google Scholar
  38. 42.
    M. Strickland, War and Chivalry. The Conduct and Perception of War in England and Normandy 1066–1217 (Cambridge, 1996).Google Scholar
  39. 43.
    Suger of St Denis, The Deeds of Louis the Fat, ed. R. C. Cusimano and J. Moorhead (Washington, DC, 1992), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
  40. 44.
    M. H. Keen, The Laws of War in the Later Middle Ages (London, 1965).Google Scholar
  41. 46.
    Ibid., pp. 64–76; S. D. B. Brown, ‘The Mercenary and His Master: Military Service and Monetary Reward in the Eleventh and Twelfth Century’, History, 74 (1989), 20–38; K. A. Fowler, Medieval Mercenaries (Oxford, 2001).Google Scholar
  42. 48.
    C. B. Bouchard, Strong ofBody Brave and Noble. Chivalry and Society in Medieval France (Ithaca, 1998); R. W. Kaeuper, Chivalry and Violence in Medieval Europe (Oxford, 1999).Google Scholar
  43. 49.
    France, Western Warfare, pp. 107–27; Rogers, Latin Siege Warfare; J. Bradbury, The Medieval Siege (Woodbridge, 1992).Google Scholar
  44. 50.
    P. M. Holt, The Age of the Crusades (London, 1986), provides an excellent introduction to the history of the Muslim Middle East.Google Scholar
  45. 51.
    Nizam al-Mulk, The Book of Government or Rules for Kings, trans. H. Darke (London, 1960).Google Scholar
  46. 52.
    M. C. Lyons and D. E. P. Jackson, Saladin. ThePolitics ofHoly War (Cambridge, 1982).Google Scholar
  47. 53.
    Y. Lev, ‘Regime, Army and Society in Egypt, 9th-12th Centuries’, in War and Society in the Eastern Mediterranean, 7th-15th Centuries, ed. Y. Lev (Leiden, 1997), pp. 115–52.Google Scholar
  48. 54.
    D. Nicolle, The Medieval Warfare Source-Book, vol. 2 (London, 1996); R. AmitaiPreiss, Mongols and Mamluks: The Mamluk-Ilkhanid War 1260–81 (Cambridge, 1995); J. M. Smith, ‘Mongol Society and the Military in the Middle East. Antecedents and Adaptations’, in War and Society in the Eastern Mediterranean, ed. Lev, pp. 249–66.Google Scholar
  49. 55.
    Powell, Anatomy of a Crusade; Oliver of Paderborn, The Capture of Damietta, trans. J. J. Gavigan, ed. E. Peters (New York, 1980).Google Scholar
  50. 56.
    N. Housley, The Later Crusades. From Lyons to Alcazar 1274–1580 (Oxford, 1992), pp. 75–8.Google Scholar
  51. 60.
    S. Painter, ‘The Third Crusade: Richard the Lionhearted and Philip Augustus’, and E. N. Johnson, ‘The Crusades of Frederick Barbarossa and Henry VI’, in A History of the Crusades, ed. K. M. Setton, 2nd edn (Madison, Wisc., 1969–89), vol. 2, The Later Crusades: 1189–1311, ed. R. L. Wolff and H. W. Hazard, pp. 45–122; P. Munz, Frederick Barbarossa. A Study in Medieval Politics (London, 1969); J. Gillingham, Richard the Lionheart (London, 1978); J. W. Baldwin, The Government of Philip Augustus. Foundations of French Royal Power in the Middle Ages (Berkeley, 1986).Google Scholar
  52. 61.
    Joinville, Life ofStLouis, in Chronicles of the Crusades, trans. Shaw, pp. 163–353; Richard, Saint Louis. Google Scholar
  53. 62.
    Odo of Deuil, De Profectione, pp. 114–21; The Conquest of Lisbon, ed. C. W. David (New York, 2001).Google Scholar
  54. 64.
    P. W. Edbury, The Kingdom of Cyprus and the Crusades, 1191–1374 (Cambridge, 1991).Google Scholar
  55. 65.
    Ehrenkreutz, ‘Place of Saladin in the Naval History of the Mediterranean’, pp. 100–16.Google Scholar
  56. 66.
    J. Prawer, Crusader Institutions (Oxford, 1980), p. 106.Google Scholar
  57. 69.
    Asbridge, ‘Field of Blood’, pp. 301–16; J. Richard, The Crusades c.1071–1291, trans. J. Birrell (Cambridge and New York, 1999) p. 171; D. Pringle, ‘The Spring of the Cresson in Crusading History’, in Dei Gesta per Francos, ed. Balard et al., pp. 231–40; B. Hamilton, The Leper King and his Heirs. Baldwin IV and the Crusader Kingdom ofJerusalem (Cambridge, 2000), pp. 132–58.Google Scholar
  58. 70.
    Smail, Crusading Warfare, pp. 182, 156–64.Google Scholar
  59. 71.
    Chronicle of the Third Crusade: A Translation of the Itinerarium peregrinorum et gesta Regis Ricardi, trans. H. J. Nicholson (Aldershot, 1997).Google Scholar
  60. 72.
    Van Cleve, Frederick II. See also D. Abulafia, Frederick II. A Medieval Emperor (London, 1988).Google Scholar
  61. 73.
    S. Runciman, ‘The Crusader States, 1243–91’, in History of the Crusades, ed. Setton, vol. 2, pp. 522–98.Google Scholar
  62. 74.
    R. J. Lilie, Byzantium and the Crusader States, 1096–1204, trans. J. C. Morris and E. Ridings (Oxford, 1994); J. P. Phillips, Defenders of the Holy Land: Relations between the Latin East and the West 1119–87 (Oxford, 1996); M. Purcell, Papal Crusading Policy 1244–91 (Leiden, 1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • John France

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations