Recapturing Olympic Mystique: The Corporate Invasion of the Classroom

  • Tara Magdalinski
  • Kimberly S. Schimmel
  • Timothy J. L. Chandler
Part of the International Political Economy Series book series (IPES)


Since the inception of the modern Olympic Games, there has existed a philosophy of ‘Olympism’ that purports to promote the ideals and spirit of sport as represented by the Olympic Games. Among the guiding principles that underpinned the original Olympic Charter prepared by founder Baron Pierre de Coubertin were a number of general aims that included developing physical and moral qualities, building a better and more peaceful world and creating friendship and international goodwill through sporting competition (see Binder, 2001). Despite the homage to democracy and inclusion expressed by continuing proponents of the Olympic movement, the ideals promoted within this movement are rooted in Eurocentric, masculinist and elitist ideologies. These sporting ideologies have centred on the doctrine of ‘amateurism’, an exclusive concept that gradually evolved to mean participation in sporting competition for its own sake, or for success without direct material reward. In the past 30 years the ideologies of Olympism have diverged from this amateurist ethos to incorporate professionalism and form what Peter Donnelly (1996) calls a global sporting monoculture centred on the values of success, capitalism and monetary reward for top-level performances. These ideals, which he labels ‘prolympism’, are today linked inextricably to a consumer culture that is divisive in terms of both class associations and economic status.


Olympic Game International Olympic Committee Corporate Sponsor Future Consumer Cumulative Annual Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Advertising Age (1998), Channel One advertisement, 11 May.Google Scholar
  2. Anon. (1998), ‘Pepsi shirt on Coke Day means suspension’, Cincinnati Enquirer, 26 March, p.A2.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, D. (2001), ‘ “Olympism” revisited as context for global education: implications for physical education’, Quest, 53(1), 14–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booth, D. and C. Tatz (1994), ‘Swimming with the big boys? The politics of Sydney’s 2000 Olympic bid’, Sporting Traditions, 11(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  5. Bryman, A. (1995), Disney and his worlds, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burk, D. (1957), ‘Free teaching materials — assets or liabilities?’, School Executive, 76 (12), 55–7.Google Scholar
  7. Cassidy, M. (2000), ‘Commercial media and corporate presence in the K-12 classroom’, in R. Andersen and L. Strate (eds), Critical studies in media commercialism, New York: Oxford University Press, pp.264–75.Google Scholar
  8. Davison, G. (1997), ‘Welcoming the world: the 1956 Melbourne Olympic Games and the re-presentation of Melbourne’, Australian Historical Studies, 28(109), 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Donnelly, P. (1996), ‘Prolympism: sport monoculture as crisis and opportunity’, Quest, 48(1), 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giroux, H. (1994), Disturbing pleasures: learning popular culture, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Gruneau, R. and H. Cantelon (1988), ‘Capitalism, commercialism and the Olympics’, in J. Seagrave and D. Chu (eds), The Olympic games in transition, Champaign: Human Kinetics, pp.245–64.Google Scholar
  12. Harty, S. (1979), Hucksters in the classroom: a review of industry propaganda in schools, Washington, DC: Center for Study of Responsive Law.Google Scholar
  13. Kincheloe Joe, L. (1997), ‘McDonald’s, power, and children: Ronald McDonald (aka Ray Kroc) does it all for you’, in Shirley R. Steinberg and Joe L. Kincheloe (eds), Kinderculture: The Corporate Construction of Childhood, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp.249–66.Google Scholar
  14. McSpotlight (2001a), ‘Extracts from the activity school pack’, retrieved 13 March 2001 from the World Wide Web: Scholar
  15. McSpotlight (2001b), ‘Growing up together’, retrieved 13 March 2001 from the World Wide Web: Scholar
  16. Molnar, A. (1996), Giving kids the business: the commercialization of America’s schools, Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  17. Molnar, A. and Jennifer, M. (2000), The Third Annual Report on Trends in Schoolhouse Commercialism, Center for the Analysis of Commercialism in Education. Retrieved 5 March 2001 from the World Wide Web: Google Scholar
  18. Nixon, H. (1988), ‘The background, nature, and implications of the organization of the “capitalist Olympics” ’, in J. Seagrave and D. Chu (eds), The Olympic Games in transition, Champaign: Human Kinetics, pp.237–51.Google Scholar
  19. ‘Olympic Education Kit’, retrieved 17 November 1997 from the World Wide Web:
  20. Olympic Marketing Matters (1999), ‘The finances of the IOC: where the money goes’, The Olympic Marketing Newsletter, 15 (June), p. 7.Google Scholar
  21. ScreenAd (2001), ‘Some interesting facts about our smallest consumers’, retrieved 13 March 2001 from the World Wide Web: Scholar
  22. Seiter, E. (1995), Sold separately: parents and children in consumer culture, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  23. Shaker, E. (1998), Corporate content: inside and outside the classroom, Education Limited. CCPA Education Project, 1(2), pp.1–35.Google Scholar
  24. Steinberg, Shirley, R. and Kincheloe Joe, L. (1997), ‘Introduction: no more secrets — kinderculture, information saturation, and the postmodern childhood,’ in Shirley R. Steinberg and Kincheloe Joe, L. (eds), The Corporate Construction of Childhood, Boulder, CO: Westview, pp. 249–66.Google Scholar
  25. Sydney Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games (2000), retrieved from the World Wide Web 10 August 2000:
  26. Tomlinson, A. (1986), ‘Going global: the FIFA story’, in A. Tomlinson and G. Whannel (eds), Off the ball: The 1986 World Cup, London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  27. Westpac Olympic Youth Program (2000), retrieved 14 September 2000 from the World Wide Web:

Copyright information

© Tara Magdalinski, Kimberly S. Schimmel and Timothy Chandler 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tara Magdalinski
  • Kimberly S. Schimmel
  • Timothy J. L. Chandler

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations