Advertisement

‘Livelihood Improvement’ in Postwar Japan: Its Relevance for Rural Development Today

  • Hiroshi Kan Sato
Part of the IDE-JETRO Series book series (IDE)

Abstract

In this chapter, we shall describe the features of Rural Livelihood Improvement in Japan during the post-Second World War period (1945–64). During the years immediately after the war, rural and urban areas in Japan were plagued by severe poverty. People suffered from food shortages and starvation, poor sanitary conditions, outbreaks of communicable diseases, and a lack of sufficient income. At that time, Japan’s development goal was poverty alleviation. In addition to poverty alleviation, the USA, as an occupation power, ordered Japan to be ‘democratized’. Consequently, the government and people of Japan were given two main development goals; poverty alleviation and democratization.

Keywords

Rural Development Extension Worker Poverty Alleviation Rural Woman Rapid Economic Growth 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

In Japanese

  1. Amano, Hiroko (2001) Sengo Nihon no josei nogyo sha no chii (Status of female farmers in postwar Japan) (Tokyo: Domesu Shuppan).Google Scholar
  2. Ichida, Tomaoko Iwata (1995) Seikatsu kaizen fukyu jigyo ni miru jenda-kan’ (Gender views in the Livelihood improvement Programm), Noson-shakai Kenkyu (Studies on rural society), vol. 31.Google Scholar
  3. Meguro, Yoriko, (1998) ‘Jenda mondai to enpawamento’ (Gender issues and empowerment), Gendai no esupuri (Gender and Spirit), no. 376, pp. 35–43.Google Scholar
  4. Nishi, Kiyoko (1985) Senryo-ka no Nihon fujin seisaku (Japanese women’s policy under the occupation) (Tokyo: Domesu).Google Scholar
  5. Tanaka, Yumiko (2002) ‘Kaihatsu ni okeru Jenda’ (Gender in the context of development), in (eds), Kaihatsu to jenda (Development and gender) (eds), Yumiko Tanaka, Mari Osawa, and Ito Ruri (Tokyo: Kokusai Kyoryoku Shuppan Kai).Google Scholar

In English

  1. Brown, Muriel W. (1957) ‘Home Economics Around the World’, Journal of Home Economics, vol. 49, no. 7, pp. 521–6.Google Scholar
  2. Lewis, Dora S. (1949) ‘Education for Family Living in Japan’, Journal of Home Economics, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 117–20.Google Scholar
  3. Roelofs, Garritt E. (1951) ‘Japan’s Extension Service — Some Problems and Progress’, Foreign Agriculture, vol. XV, no. 11, pp. 243–5.Google Scholar
  4. Rokahr, Mary (1951) ‘Home Economists the World Around’, Journal of Home Economics, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 93–4.Google Scholar
  5. Taniguchi, Yoshiko, Akira Namae, Kumiko Nose, Yoko Fujinaga, Reiko Murayama and Yoshie Yamazaki (1993) ‘The Historical and Structural Analysis of the Experience of Japanese Women in Rural Development — A Case Study of the Home Living Improvement Extension Service Program’ (in English abstract), Journal of International Development Studies, vol. 3, pp. 1–8.Google Scholar
  6. Thompson, Todd S. (2002) A History of Extension at USAID, (Washington DC: USAID and the World Bank).Google Scholar
  7. Yamasaki, Yoshie, Yoshiko Taniguchi, Akira Namae, Kumiko Nose, Yoko Fujinaga and Reiko Murayama (1994) ‘Rethinking the Home Living Improvement Movement of the Rural Women in Postwar Japan’ (in English abstract), Journal of International Development Studies, vol. 4, pp. 9–16.Google Scholar
  8. Ward, Gordon H. (1952). ‘Japan’s Agricultural Cooperative Program’, Foreign Agriculture, vol. XVI, no. 6, pp. 115–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Developing Economies (IDE),JETRO 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Kan Sato

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations