Marx considered his theory of money to be one of his main accomplishments and a significant advance over Ricardo’s theory and classical economics in general, which had simply taken money for granted, or explained the existence of money in ad hoc fashion, on the basis of the practical difficulties of barter, unrelated to any theory of value.


Quantity Theory Marxian Theory Labour Theory Paper Money Credit Money 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Banaji, Janus (1979), ‘From the commodity to capital: Hegel’s dialectic in Marx’s Capital’, in D. Elson (ed.), Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism (London: CSE Books).Google Scholar
  2. Bellofiore, Riccardo (2004) ‘The value of money and the notion of measure’, Scholar
  3. Blaug, Mark (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect (New York: Cambridge University Press, 4th edn).Google Scholar
  4. Cartelier, Jean (1991), ‘Marx’s theory of value, exchange and surplus-value: a suggested reformulation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(3), 257–69.Google Scholar
  5. Ganssmann, Heiner (1998), ‘The emergence of credit money’, in R. Bellofiore (ed.) Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal, Volume I: Method, Value, and Money (London: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  6. Hilferding, Rudolph (1910), Finance Capital (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981).Google Scholar
  7. Itoh, Makoto and Costas Lapavitsas (1999), The Political Economy of Money and Finance (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  8. Lapavitsas, Costas (2000), ‘Money and capitalism: the significance of commodity money’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 32(4), 631–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lapavitsas, Costas (2003), Social Foundations of Markets, Money, and Credit (London and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  10. Lavoie, Don (1986), ‘Marx, the quantity theory, and the theory of value’, History of Political Economy, 18(1), 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lipietz, Alain (1982), The Enchanted World: Inflation, Credit, and the World Crisis (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  12. Marx, Karl (1859), A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy (New York: International, 1970).Google Scholar
  13. Marx, Karl (1867), Capital, Volume I (New York: Random House, 1977).Google Scholar
  14. Matthews, Peter Hans (1996), ‘The modern foundations of Marx’s monetary economics’, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 3(1), 61–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Moseley, Fred (1997), ‘Abstract labor: substance or form? A critique of the value-form interpretation of Marx’s theory’, Efmoseley/VALUEFRM.htmGoogle Scholar
  16. Moseley, Fred (1998), ‘A critique of Benetti’s critique of Marx’s Derivation of the Necessity of money.’ Scholar
  17. Moseley, Fred (2004), ‘The determination of the “monetary expression of labour time” in the case of non-commodity money’, Scholar
  18. Murray, Patrick (1988), Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).Google Scholar
  19. Reuten, Geert and Michael Williams (1989), Value-Form and the State: The Tendencies of Accumulation and the Determination of Economic Policy in Capitalist Society (London/New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  20. Rosdolsky, Roman (1977), The Making of Marx’s Capital (London: Pluto Press).Google Scholar
  21. Weeks, John (1981), Capital and Exploitation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Williams, Michael (2000), ‘Why Marx neither has nor needs a commodity theory of money’, Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 435–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fred Moseley 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fred Moseley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations