Skip to main content

Abstract

Marx considered his theory of money to be one of his main accomplishments and a significant advance over Ricardo’s theory and classical economics in general, which had simply taken money for granted, or explained the existence of money in ad hoc fashion, on the basis of the practical difficulties of barter, unrelated to any theory of value.

I would like to express appreciation to Mount Holyoke College for its generous financial support for the conference, especially Dean Donal O’Shea, and I would also like to thank Dawn Larder and Alena Zhaliazniak for their excellent organizational and logistical work relating to it. Finally, I also would like to thank all the conference participants for our many lively and productive discussions, both in person and by email. In spite of our disagreements (or is it because of our disagreements?), I have learned a lot from these wonderful Marxian scholars about Marx’s theory of money and other theories of money.

This introduction represents my interpretation of Marx’s theory of money. A number of the authors in this book disagree with my interpretation, as will be evident from their chapters. I have benefited from suggestions for the introduction from almost all the authors, especially Riccardo Bellofiore, Geert Reuten and Chris Arthur. The remaining errors are mine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banaji, Janus (1979), ‘From the commodity to capital: Hegel’s dialectic in Marx’s Capital’, in D. Elson (ed.), Value: The Representation of Labour in Capitalism (London: CSE Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellofiore, Riccardo (2004) ‘The value of money and the notion of measure’, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/working%20papers/BELLOFIORE.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaug, Mark (1985), Economic Theory in Retrospect (New York: Cambridge University Press, 4th edn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartelier, Jean (1991), ‘Marx’s theory of value, exchange and surplus-value: a suggested reformulation’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 15(3), 257–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganssmann, Heiner (1998), ‘The emergence of credit money’, in R. Bellofiore (ed.) Marxian Economics: A Reappraisal, Volume I: Method, Value, and Money (London: Palgrave).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilferding, Rudolph (1910), Finance Capital (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoh, Makoto and Costas Lapavitsas (1999), The Political Economy of Money and Finance (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapavitsas, Costas (2000), ‘Money and capitalism: the significance of commodity money’, Review of Radical Political Economy, 32(4), 631–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapavitsas, Costas (2003), Social Foundations of Markets, Money, and Credit (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie, Don (1986), ‘Marx, the quantity theory, and the theory of value’, History of Political Economy, 18(1), 155–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipietz, Alain (1982), The Enchanted World: Inflation, Credit, and the World Crisis (London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (1859), A Contribution to a Critique of Political Economy (New York: International, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, Karl (1867), Capital, Volume I (New York: Random House, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, Peter Hans (1996), ‘The modern foundations of Marx’s monetary economics’, The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 3(1), 61–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, Fred (1997), ‘Abstract labor: substance or form? A critique of the value-form interpretation of Marx’s theory’, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/%7 Efmoseley/VALUEFRM.htm

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, Fred (1998), ‘A critique of Benetti’s critique of Marx’s Derivation of the Necessity of money.’ http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/working%20papers/BENETTI.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, Fred (2004), ‘The determination of the “monetary expression of labour time” in the case of non-commodity money’, http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~fmoseley/working%20papers/MELT.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Patrick (1988), Marx’s Theory of Scientific Knowledge (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuten, Geert and Michael Williams (1989), Value-Form and the State: The Tendencies of Accumulation and the Determination of Economic Policy in Capitalist Society (London/New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosdolsky, Roman (1977), The Making of Marx’s Capital (London: Pluto Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, John (1981), Capital and Exploitation (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Michael (2000), ‘Why Marx neither has nor needs a commodity theory of money’, Review of Political Economy, 12(4), 435–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Fred Moseley

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moseley, F. (2005). Introduction. In: Moseley, F. (eds) Marx’s Theory of Money. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523999_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics