Advertisement

Mummy is Become Merchandise: Literature and the Anglo-Egyptian Mummy Trade in the Seventeenth Century

  • Philip Schwyzer

Abstract

In Thomas Browne’s ‘Fragment on Mummies’, Egypt is represented as both ancient and amnesiac, quite incapable of giving any good account of herself or her former glories. The quoted passage couples a general meditation on the entropic power of Time with a specific comment on the state of Egyptian civility in the seventeenth century. As a meditation, it echoes and bears comparison to Browne’s Hydriotaphia, and some readers have held it in no less esteem. As a comment on Egypt, it is typically ‘Orientalist’ in the sense of the term developed by Edward Said. The ‘mumbling’, senile East cannot articulate, much less represent itself; it must be interrogated, deciphered, transformed into an object of knowledge by the (presumably) European ‘traveller’ who ‘paceth amazedly’ in the shadow of the pyramids. ‘Egypt itself is now become the land of obliviousness and doteth.’ Oriental forgetfulness serves as the starting point for an English project of selfless scholarly recovery that will eventually be used in turn to justify colonial rule.2

Keywords

Seventeenth Century Sixteenth Century Dead Body Counterfeit Product English Writer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Geoffrey Keynes, ed., The Works of Sir Thomas Browne, 2nd edition (London: Faber and Faber, 1964), 3: 472.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Edward Said, Orientalism: Western Perceptions of the Orient (New York: Vintage Books, 1978), p. 32.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robert J. Kane, ‘James Crossley, Sir Thomas Browne, and the Fragment on Mummies’, RES 9 (1933): 266–74.Google Scholar
  4. 6.
    Verstegan, A Restitution of Decayed Intelligence in Antiquities (Antwerp, 1605), p. 51.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Alfred C. Wood, A History of the Levant Company (London: Oxford University Press, 1935), pp. 33, 234–5.Google Scholar
  6. 11.
    Rosalie David, ‘Mummification’, in Paul T. Nicholson and Ian Shaw, eds., Ancient Egyptian Materials and Technology (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), pp. 372–89.Google Scholar
  7. 12.
    Karl H. Dannenfeldt, ‘Egyptian Mumia: The Sixteenth-Century Experience and Debate’, Sixteenth Century Journal 16 (1985): 163–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 16.
    Caroline Walker Bynum, Holy Feast and Holy Fast: The Religious Significance of Food to Medieval Women (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1987).Google Scholar
  9. 18.
    Samuel Purchas, ed., Purchas his Pilgrimage, 3rd edition (1617), p. 849.Google Scholar
  10. 19.
    David Cressy, Birth, Marriage, and Death: Ritual, Religion and the Life-Cycle in Tudor and Stuart England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997), p. 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 20.
    John Oldham, Babylon Blazon’d, or, The Jesuit Jerk’d (1681), p. 5.Google Scholar
  12. 21.
    Peter Hulme, Colonial Encounters: Europe and the Native Caribbean, 1492–1797 (London: Methuen, 1986),Google Scholar
  13. Francis Barker, Peter Hulme and Margaret Iversen, eds., Cannibalism and the Colonial World (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  14. 22.
    William Lithgow, The Totall Discourse of the Rare Adventures (1640), p. 311.Google Scholar
  15. 24.
    Sir Kenelm Digby, Choice and Experimented Receipts in Physick and Chirurgery (1675), p. 68.Google Scholar
  16. 25.
    Alexander Ross, Arcana Microcosmi (1652), p. 97.Google Scholar
  17. 26.
    Karen Gordon-Grube, ‘Evidence of Medicinal Cannibalism in Puritan New England: “Mummy” and Related Remedies in Edward Taylor’s “Dispensatory”’, Early American Literature 28 (1993): 185–221;Google Scholar
  18. 27.
    Richard Hakluyt, The Principal Navigations, Voyages, Traffiques and Discoveries of the English Nation (1599), 2: 277.Google Scholar
  19. 36.
    Lewes Roberts, The Merchants Map of Commerce (1638), p. 108.Google Scholar
  20. 38.
    John Dryden, Sir Martin Mar-All, in The Works of John Dryden, Volume 9, ed. John Loftis (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1966), 4.1.508;Google Scholar
  21. 39.
    John Webster, The White Devil, 2.1.247–51, in David Bevington, ed., English Renaissance Drama (New York: Norton, 2002).Google Scholar
  22. 42.
    Sir Francis Kinnaston, ‘To Cynthia, On a Mistresse for his Rivals’, in Leoline and Sydanis (1642), p. 126.Google Scholar
  23. 43.
    John Dryden, ‘Prologue to Albumazar’, in The Works of John Dryden, Volume 1: Poems 1649–1680, ed. Edward Niles Hooker and H. T. Swedenborg, Jr. (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1956), p. 142.Google Scholar
  24. 44.
    William Shakespeare, Sonnet 55, in Stephen Greenblatt, ed., The Norton Shakespeare (New York: Norton, 1997), p. 1941.Google Scholar
  25. 45.
    Thomas Philipot, ‘For the Renowned Composer’, in Edward Benlowes, Theophila (1652), sig. C3v.Google Scholar
  26. 46.
    James Howell, ‘Historiae Sacrum’, in Poems on Several Choice and Various Subjects (1663), p. 9.Google Scholar
  27. 47.
    John Donne, ‘Love’s Alchemy’, in A. J. Smith, ed., The Complete English Poems (London: Penguin, 1986), p. 65,Google Scholar
  28. 48.
    Medicinal Cannibalism and Healing the Body Politic in Titus Andronicus’, ELH 70 (2003): 677–708.Google Scholar
  29. 52.
    The Honest Man’s Fortune, ed. Johan Gerritsen (Groningen: Wolters, 1952), 5.3.23–4.Google Scholar
  30. 58.
    Albert S. Cook, ‘Shakespeare, Oth. 3.4.74’, Modern Language Notes 21 (1906), p. 248.Google Scholar
  31. 64.
    Gananath Obeyesekere, ‘“British Cannibals”: Contemplation of an Event in the Death and Resurrection of James Cook, Explorer’, Critical Inquiry 18 (1992): 630–54;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 65.
    Stephen Greenblatt, ‘Marlowe, Marx and Anti-Semitism’, in Learning to Curse (London: Routledge, 1990), pp. 40–58;Google Scholar
  33. 70.
    Robert Howard, The Blind Lady, in Poems (1660), pp. 92–3.Google Scholar
  34. 71.
    Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The Communist Manifesto (New York: International Publishers, 1948), p. 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Philip Schwyzer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Schwyzer

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations