Skip to main content

EUphoria to Apathy: EP Turnout in the New Member States

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: EU Election Studies ((EUES))

A story in The Economist (2004), apocryphal or not, encapsulates the attitude of the EU’s electorate towards the 2004 EP elections. A British MEP candidate approached a shopper to elicit her support, the woman stood as close as she could to the hapless would-be MEP and shouted ‘Boring!’ This was the message the recently enlarged EU’s voters sent to both national and EU leaders, with particular venom in the ten new member states (NMS).1 The question for both sets of political elite is how could the triumph of enlargement so quickly degenerate into the turnout disaster of the EP elections?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   37.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Blais, A., and A. Dobrzynska (1998) ‘Turnout in Electoral Democracies’ European Journal of Political Research, 33 (2), 239–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blondell, J., R. Sinnott and P. Svensson (1998) People and Parliament in the European Union. Participation, Democracy and Legitimacy (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The Economist (2004) ‘Barbarians at the Gate’ 12 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M., C. van der Eijk and E. Oppenhuis (1996) ‘The Institutional Context: Turnout’ in C. van der Eijk and M. Franklin (eds) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabel, M.J. (2003) ‘Public Support for the European Parliament’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (2), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gros, D. (2002) ‘Health not Wealth: Enlarging the EMU’ in P. Mair and J. Zielonka (eds) The Enlarged European Union: Diversity and Adaptation, (London: Frank Cass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., T. Raunio and R. Scully (2003) ‘Fifty Years On: Research on the European Parliament’ Journal of Common Market Studies, 41 (2), 191–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International IDEA (2004) Visualising the Euro-gap (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman, R.W. (1987) ‘Political Institutions and Voter Turnout in the Industrial Democracies’ American Political Science Review, 81 (2), 405–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jesuit, D. (2003) ‘The Regional Dynamics of European Electoral Politics: Participation in National and European Contests in the 1990s’ European Union Politics, 4 (2), 139–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurpas, S., M. Incerti and B. Crum (2004) Preview of the 2004 European Parliament Elections: Results of an EPIN Survey of National Experts (Brussels: European Policy Institutes Network (EPIN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (2001a) ‘Invisible, Irrelevant but Insistent? Euro-elections and the European Parliament’ in J. Lodge (ed.) The 1999 Elections to the European Parliament (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodge, J. (2001b) ‘Making the EP Elections Distinctive: A Proposal for a Uniform e-Electoral Procedure’ in J. Lodge (ed.) The 1999 Elections to the European Parliament (London: Palgrave Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, M. (1998) ‘Testing the Second-Order Election Model After Four European Elections’ British Journal of Political Science, 28 (4), 891–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattila, M. (2003) ‘Why Bother? Determinants of Turnout in the European Elections’ Electoral Studies, 22 (3), 449–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR) (2004) Elections to the European Parliament, 10–13 June 2004 (Warsaw: OSCE/ODIHR).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacek, A.C., and B. Radcliff (2003) ‘Voter Participation and Party-Group Fortunes in European Parliament Elections, 1979–1999: A Cross-National Analysis’ Political Research Quarterly, 56 (1), 91–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reif, K., and H. Schmitt (1980) ‘Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for Analysis of European Election Results’ European Journal of Political Research, 8 (1), 3–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. (2004) ‘Voter Turnout in the European Union’ in Voter Turnout in Western Europe since 1945: A Regional Report (Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, H., and R. Mannheimer (1991) ‘About Voting and Non-Voting in the European Elections of June 1989’ European Journal of Political Research, 19 (1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, H., and J. Thomassen (eds) (1999) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Topf, R. (1995) ‘Electoral Participation’ in H.-D. Klingeman and D. Fuchs (eds) Citizens and the State (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., and M. Franklin (eds) (1996) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Mark D. Baimbridge

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Baimbridge, M.D. (2005). EUphoria to Apathy: EP Turnout in the New Member States. In: Lodge, J. (eds) The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament. EU Election Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523821_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics