Skip to main content

Part of the book series: EU Election Studies ((EUES))

  • 18 Accesses

The sixth elections to the EP consolidated the position of the centre-right groups in the Parliament. The electoral triumph achieved by the European People’s Party (EPP) in 1999, ending the 20-year reign of the Party of European Socialists (PES) as the biggest party in the EP, was repeated with the EPP again emerging as the largest party in the chamber. The group of the European Liberal, Democrat and Reform Party (ELDR) managed to attract new member parties after the election, giving the group its highest seat share after the fi rst direct elections held in 1979. However, the right-wing groups do by no means form a coherent bloc capable of cooperation across the various policy issues that are on the EP’s agenda, and hence the left-wing groups, particularly PES, will remain relevant in terms of building winning coalitions in the chamber. The progress made by Euro-sceptical lists in several countries received a lot of attention in the media, but anti-EU representatives continue to be marginalised in the chamber.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Tapio Raunio

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Raunio, T. (2005). The EP Party System After the 2004 Elections. In: Lodge, J. (eds) The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament. EU Election Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523821_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics