Since the first Euro-elections, much attention has been paid to the level of turnout. In the past, a high turnout was deemed essential to justify the European Parliament’s claims and quest for an accretion of its originally negligible legislative powers. The mere fact of its direct election was seen as lending credence to its claim to being the only directly legitimated institution, and was key to its claims as to the legitimacy of its attempts to acquire genuine legislative authority. Its legislative and control functions and powers were boosted over the years, both via minimalist small steps that exploited its own Rules of Procedure to give expression to traditional democratic values and practices in respect of parliamentary control over the executive, and via the maximalist strategy of treaty reform and constitution-building associated with Altiero Spinelli.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Juliet Lodge
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lodge, J. (2005). The European Parliament 2004–09 – A Parliament for the People of the New EU Polity?. In: Lodge, J. (eds) The 2004 Elections to the European Parliament. EU Election Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523821_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523821_32
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3518-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52382-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)