Abstract
Malaysia and Singapore have had provident funds (PF) since long before the `individual retirement savings account’ (IRSA) became popular in policy dis-cussions following the publication of the World Bank’s Averting the Old Age Crisis (1994). The PF is similar to the IRSA in every respect except that it is centrally managed by the government rather than by private managers. Otherwise, both are compulsory defined contribution arrangements which specify the level of contribution rather than the benefits more typical of social insurance arrangements. Both are also fully funded in the sense that members’ benefit is equal to the balance in their personal account, imposing no actual or accrued liability on the government. The distinction is not firm in practice, however, as the Mandatory Provident Fund (MPF) launched in 2000 in Hong Kong is an IRSA in all but the name.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Asher, M. and Newman, D. (2002). Private Pensions in Asia: An Assessment of Eight Systems, in OECD (ed.), Regulating Private Pension Schemes: Trends and Challenges, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 51–104.
Asher, M. G. (1995). Investing National Provident Fund Balances in Malaysia and Singapore, Unpublished paper prepared for the World Bank Mission in China.
Cardarelli, R. (2000). Singapore: Selected Issues, Washington, DC: IMF.
Catalan, M., Impavido, G. and A. R. Musalem (2000). Contractual Savings or Stock Market Development — Which Leads? World Bank Policy Research Working Page No. 2421, Washington: World Bank.
Central Provident Fund Board (2001). Annual Report, Singapore: Central Provident Fund Board.
Charlton, R. and McKinnon, R. (2001). Pensions in Development, Aldershot: Ashgate.
Chua, B. H. (2000). Public Housing Residents as Clients of the State, Housing Studies, 15 (1), 45–60.
Datta, G. and Shome, P. (1981). Social Security and Household Savings: Asian Experience, Developing Economies, 19 (2).
Economic Review Committee (2002). Report of the Sub-committee on Taxation, CPF, Wages and Land, Singapore: Economic Review Committee.
Employees Provident Fund (2003).
Jones, G. (1990). Consequences of Rapid Fertility Decline for Old Age Security in Asia, Canberra: Australian National University.
Lee, H. L. (2001). Financial Security in Old Age: Whither the Employees Provident Fund of Malaysia, Kelana Jaya: Pelanduk.
Lim, K. L. (2001). Implications of Singapore’s CPF Scheme on Consumption Choices and Retirement, Pacific Economic Review, 6(3), 361–82.
—(2002). Enhancing the Financial Security of Older Singaporeans, in Koh, A. T. etal. (eds), Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 66–94.
Low, L. and Aw, T. C. (1997). Housing a Healthy, Educated and Wealthy Nation through the CPF, Singapore: Times Academic Press for the Institute of Policy Studies.
McCarthy D., Mitchell, O. S. and Piggott, J. (2002). Asset Rich and Cash Poor: Retirement Provision and Housing Policy in Singapore, Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 1(3), 197–222.
McKinnon, R. (1996). The Public Management of National Provident Funds for State-Led Development: The Case of Malaysia’s Employees’ Provident Fund, International Journal of Public Sector Management, 9(1), 44–60.
Mokhtar, A. (1995). Study on the Effectiveness of the EPF Retirement Schemes for the Retirees, Report Prepared for The Employees Provident Fund (EPF).
Parrott, A. (2000). The Singapore Social Security Experience: Is There a Lesson for the UK and the Rest of the World?, Insurance Research and Practice, 15(2), 14–27.
Peebles, G. (2002). Saving and Investment in Singapore, in Koh, A. T. etal. (ed.), Singapore Economy in the 21st Century: Issues and Strategies, Singapore: McGraw-Hill, 373–400.
Rao, M. G. (1998). Accommodating Public Expenditure Policies: The Case of Fast Growing Asian Economies, World Development, 26, 673–94.
Singapore Department of Statistics (1999). Yearbook of Statistics, Singapore: Singapore Department of Statistics.
—(2001). Singapore Census of Population 2000, Advance Data Release, 6, Households and Housing: Singapore Singapore: Department of Statistics.
Singapore Ministry of Health (2000). Annual Report 2000, Singapore: Government Printing Office.
World Bank (1994). Arecting the Old Age Crisis, Washington, DC: World Bank.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 UNRISD
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramesh, M. (2005). One and a Half Cheers for Provident Funds in Malaysia and Singapore. In: Kwon, Hj. (eds) Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Social Policy in a Development Context. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523661_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523661_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-52092-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52366-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)