Can Malaysia’s Growth Be Sustainable?
Since the mid 1980s Malaysia has been successful in attracting a large number of world-class electronics firms and forming an industrial agglomeration, especially in the electronics industry. As a result, Malaysia has been a leading producer of electronics products in the international market, and the industry has been an important engine of growth. It is often said, however, that since the international competitiveness of Malaysia is being eroded partly owing to the rapid emergence of China as an industrial power, it may not be possible for Malaysia to sustain its current industrial growth.
KeywordsForeign Direct Investment Market Share International Competitiveness Domestic Investment Industrial Cluster
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Department of Statistics, Malaysia. 2002. Census of Manufacturing Industries. Kuala Lumpur: Department of Statistics, Malaysia.Google Scholar
- Electronics Industry Association of Japan (2001). List of Overseas Establishments. Tokyo: Electronics Industry Association of Japan.Google Scholar
- Einhorn, Bruce. 1999. ‘Mahathir’s High Tech Folly’, Business Week, 29 March, p. 83.Google Scholar
- Ikemoto, Yukio. 1991. Income Distribution in Thailand. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies.Google Scholar
- Jussawalla, Meheroo. 2003a. ‘Bridging the Global Digital Divide’, in Meheroo Jussawalla and Richard D. Taylor (eds), Information Technology Parks of the Asia Pacific: Lessons for the Regional Digital Divide. New York: Sharpe. pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
- Jussawalla, Meheroo. 2003b. ‘The Role of Information Technology Parks in Bridging the Digital Divide’, in Meheroo Jussawalla and Richard D. Taylor (eds), Information Technology Parks of the Asia Pacific: Lessons for the Regional Digital Divide. New York: Sharpe. pp. 254–84.Google Scholar
- Kimura, Koichiro. 2003. ‘China’s Regional Industrial Disparity from the Viewpoint of Industrial Agglomeration’, in Mitsuhiro Kagami and Masatsugu Tsuji (eds), Industrial Agglomeration: Facts and Lessons for Developing Countries. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies. pp. 203–34.Google Scholar
- Mahathir, Mohamad. 1998. Multimedia Super Corridor. Kuala Lumpur: Pelanduk.Google Scholar
- Malaysian Industrial Development Authority (MIDA). 2003. Report on the Performance of the Manufacturing Sector 2002. Kuala Lumpur: MIDA.Google Scholar
- MITI Malaysia. 2003. Malaysia International Trade and Industry Report 2002. Kuala Lumpur: Ampang.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Finance Malaysia. 2001. Economic Report 2001/2002. Kuala Lumpur: Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.Google Scholar
- National Bureau of Statistics, People’s Republic of China, 2002. China Statistical Yearbook 2002. Beijing: China Statistics Press.Google Scholar
- Okabe, Mitsuhiro. 2003. ‘Rapid Recovery of Foreign Direct Investment into Malaysia’, Tsusho Koho, no. 15523 (28 August), 1–2. Tokyo: JETRO (in Japanese).Google Scholar
- Okamoto, Yumiko. 2005. ‘Toward the Formation of an East Asian Regional Arrangement,’ Pacific Asia 2022: Sketching Futures of a Region, edited by Simon S. C. Tay. Tokyo and New York: Japan Centre for International Exchange.Google Scholar
- Okamoto, Yumiko and Ing-Wei Huang. 2003. ‘Foreign Investment and Regional Development in Developing Countries’, paper presented at the JSPS-NRCT workshop titled ‘Perspectives of Roles of State, Market, Society, and Economic Cooperation in Asia’, Kyoto University, 6–7 November, 2003.Google Scholar
- Okamoto, Yumiko and Shujiro Urata. 1997. ‘Japan’s Foreign Direct Investment in Malaysia in the 1990s’, in Kazue Sugiyama and Stephen Leong (eds), Revitalisation of Japan’s Economy: Implications for Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: ISIS.Google Scholar
- Reed Electronics Research. 2000. Yearbook of World Electronics Data 2000: Market Prospects to 2003. Oxford, UK: Reed Electronics Research.Google Scholar
- Taylor, Richard D. 2003. ‘The Malaysian Experience: The Multimedia Super Corridor’, in Meheroo Jussawalla and Richard D. Taylor (eds), Information Technology Parks of the Asia Pacific: Lessons for the Regional Digital Divide. New York: Sharpe. pp. 64–118.Google Scholar