Skip to main content

Development Strategies for the Twenty-First Century

  • Chapter
New Development Strategies

Abstract

The mixed economy is possibly the most valuable heritage that the twentieth century has bequeathed to the twenty-first in the realm of economic policy. The nineteenth century discovered capitalism. The twentieth century learned how to tame it and render it more productive by supplying the institutional ingredients needed for a self-sustaining market economy: central banking, stabilizing fiscal policy, antitrust legislation and regulation, social insurance and political democracy. It was during the twentieth century that these elements of the mixed economy took root in today’s advanced industrial countries. The simple idea that markets and the state are complements — recognized in practice if not always in principle — enabled the unprecedented prosperity experienced by the United States, Western Europe and parts of East Asia during the second half of the century.

The paper on which this chapter is based was presented at the conference on ‘Developing Economies in the 21st Century’, held at the Institute for Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, Chiba, 26–27 January 2000. I am grateful to the conference organizers and participants for valuable comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesina, A., and A. Drazen (1991) ‘Why Are Stabilizations Delayed?’, American Economic Review, vol. 81, pp. 1170–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (1989) Asias Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, D. (1993) ‘Equalizing Exchange: Trade Liberalization and Income Convergence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 108, no. 3, pp. 653–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D., K. Pistor and J.-F. Richard (1999) ‘Economic Development, Legality and the Transplant Effect’, unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordo, M. D., C. Goldin and E. N. White (eds) (1998) The Defining Moment: The Great Depression and the American Economy in the Twentieth Century (Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S., and B. Bosworth (1996) ‘Economic Growth in East Asia: Accumulation versus Assimilation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 2, pp. 135–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollar, D. (1992) ‘Outward-Oriented Developing Economies Really Do Grow More Rapidly: Evidence from 95 LDCs, 1976–85’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 40(3) pp. 523–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, S. (1998) ‘Openness, Productivity and Growth: What Do We Really Know?’, Economic Journal, vol. 108, pp. 383–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, S. (1998) ‘In Defense of the IMF’, Foreign Affairs, July/August pp. 103–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, V. and G. M. Milesi-Ferretti (1995) ‘Economic Effects and Structural Determinants of Capital Controls’, IMF Staff Papers, no. 42 (Washington, DC: IMF) pp. 517–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, R., and M. Gavin (1996) Securing Stability and Growth in a Shock Prone Region: The Policy Challenge for Latin America, Working Paper (Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, K. and J. E. Stiglitz (1999) Modern Economic Theory and Development (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, S. M. (1998) Risk and the Labor Market: Societal Past as Economic Prologue (Los Angeles, CA: Institute of Industrial Relations, UCLA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. and A. Shleifer (1999) Coase v. the Coasians: The Regulation and Development ofSecurities Markets in Poland and the Czech Republic (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT and Harvard).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. and G. Olivei (1999) ‘Capital Account Liberalization, Financial Deepening, and Economic Growth’, NBER Working Paper W7384 (Cambridge, Mass.: NBER).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kraay, A. (1998) In Search of the Macroeconomic Effects of Capital Account Liberalization (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney, W. F. (1997) ‘Chile’, in Laura Randall (ed.), The Political Economy of Latin America in the Postwar Period (Austin, Tex.: University of Texas Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukand, S. W. (1998) ‘Globalization and the “Confidence Game”: Policy Making in the Open Economy’, unpublished paper, Department of Economics, Tufts University, Boston MA, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., and R. Thomas (1973) The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C., and B. Weingast (1989) ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth Century England’, Journal ofEconomic History, vol. xtrx, pp. 803–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qian, Y. (1999) ‘Institutional Foundations of China’s Market Transition’, unpublished paper, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, D. (1997) ‘The Correlates of Change in International Financial Regulation’, American Political Science Review, vol. 91, pp. 531–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radelet, S., and J. Sachs (1998) ‘The Onset of the Asian Financial Crisis’, unpublished paper, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, F. and D. Rodrik (2000) ‘Trade Policy and Economic Growth: A Skeptic’s Guide to the Cross-National Evidence’, in B. Bernanke and K. Rogoff (eds), NBER Macroeconomics Annual2000 (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press for the NBER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1995) ‘Getting Interventions Right: How South Korea and Taiwan Grew Rich’, Economic Policy, vol. 20, pp. 55–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998a) ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 106, pp. 997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998b) ‘Who Needs Capital-Account Convertibility?’, in Fischer, S., Cooper, R. N., Dornbusch, R., Garber, C., Massad, C., Polak, J.J., Rodrik, D. and Tarapore, S. S. Should the IMF Pursue Capital-Account Convertibility?, Essays in International Finance no. 207, (Princeton, NJ: Intemational Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999a) The New Global Economy and Developing Countries: Making Openness Work (Washington, DC: Overseas Development Council).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999b) ‘Where Did All the Growth Go? External Shocks, Social Conflict, and Growth Collapses’, Journal ofEconomic Growth, 4(4), pp. 385–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1999c) ‘Institutions for High-Quality Growth: What They Are and How to Acquire Them’, unpublished paper, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2000) ‘Governing the World Economy: Does One Architectural Style Fit All?’, Brookings Trade Policy Fonsm (1999) Collins, S. and Lawrence, R., (Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. and A. Warner (1995) ‘Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, vol. 1, pp. 1–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. (1998) ‘Knowledge and Development: Economic Science, Economic Policy, and Economic Advice’, paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, DC, 20–1 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, L. H. (1998) ‘Building an International Financial Architecture for the 21st Century’, remarks to the Cato Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tornell, A., and P. R. Lane (1999) ‘The Voracity Effect’, American Economic Review, vol. 89, pp. 22–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unger, R. M. (1998) Democracy Realized: The Progressive Alternative (London and New York: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market: Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian Industrialization (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, T. D. (2000) International Financial Markets as Sources of Crises or Discipline: The Too Much, Too Late Hypothesis Essays in International Finance (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. and M. Mahar (1998) A Survey of Financial Liberalization, Essays in International Finance no. 211 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University, November).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1997) World Development Report, 1997 (Washington, DC: World Bank).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazawa, I. (2000) ‘Regional Cooperation in a Changing Global Environment: Success and Failure of East Asia’, paper presented at the UNCTAD X High-Level Round-Table on Trade and Development, February.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodrik, D. (2004). Development Strategies for the Twenty-First Century. In: Kohsaka, A. (eds) New Development Strategies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523609_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics