Empowering Social Policy: The Role of Social Care Services in Modern Welfare States

  • Anneli Anttonen
Part of the Social Policy in a Development Context book series (SPDC)

Abstract

Care is a growing concern in welfare states and an ever-more frequent object of social policy reforms. Every post-industrial society is having to confront anew how to support families and individuals and organize the care of those who need regular help, particularly small children and those adults whose disabilities are linked to age or illness. Long-established forms of informal care are being rapidly undermined by economic and social change. Families are in particular no more self-evident care providers in the way they used to be. Social networks based on kinship have fragmented and even become transnational (Vuorela 2002). It is becoming more and more common for older people to live alone. The spread of female employment outside the home, above all, has changed the division of labour between the sexes. Unpaid work done by women at home and in the local community can no longer be treated as a resource to be drawn on freely.

Keywords

Europe Income Turkey Expense OECD 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, B. (2000) Doing the Dirty Work? The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Anttonen, A. (1997) ‘The Welfare State and Social Citizenship’. In K. Kauppinen and T. Gordon (eds.), Unresolved Dilemmas: Women, Work and the Family in the United States, Europe and the former Soviet Union. Aldershot: Ashgate: 9–32.Google Scholar
  3. Anttonen, A. (1999) Lasten kotihoidon tuki suomalaisessa perhepolitiikassa. Sosiaali-ja terveysturvan tutkimuksia, 52. Helsinki: Kela (Child home care allowance in Finnish Family policy: studies on social and health politics, 52.).Google Scholar
  4. Anttonen, A. (2001) ‘The Politics of Social Care in Finland: Child and Elder care in Transition’. in M. Daly (ed.), Care Work: The Quest for Security. Geneva: International Labour Office: 143–58.Google Scholar
  5. Anttonen, A. (2002) ‘Universalism and Social Policy: A Nordic–Feminist Revaluation’. Nora—Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 10 (2): 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anttonen, A., Baldock, J. and Sipilä, J. (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  7. Anttonen, A. and Sipil~a, J. (1996) ‘European Social Care Services: Is it Possible to Identify Models?’. Journal of European Social Policy, 6 (2): 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anttonen, A., Sipilä, J. and Baldock, J. (2003) ‘Patterns of Social Care in Five Industrial Societies: Explaining Diversity’. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipilä (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 167–97.Google Scholar
  9. Baldock, J. (2003) ‘Social Care in the United Kingdom: A Pattern of Discretionary Social Administration’. in A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipilä, J. (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 109–42.Google Scholar
  10. Clasen, J. (1999) ‘Introduction’. In J. Clasen (ed.), Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell: 1–12.Google Scholar
  11. Daatland, S.O. (2001) ‘Ageing, Families and Welfare Systems: Comparative Perspectives’. Zeitschrift f~ur Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 34 (1): 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Daly, M. (2001) ‘Care policies in Western Europe’. in M. Daly (ed.), Care Work: The Quest for Security. Geneva: International Labour Office: 33–55.Google Scholar
  13. Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (2000) ‘The Concept of Social Care and the Analysis of Contemporary Welfare States’. British Journal of Sociology, 51 (2): 281–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daly, M. and Lewis, J. (1998)‘Introduction: Conceptualising Social Care in the Context of Welfare State Restructuring’. in J. Lewis (ed.), Gender, Social Care and Welfare State Restructuring in Europe. Ashgate: Aldershot: 1–24.Google Scholar
  15. Dong-Ho, J. (2001) A Comparative Analysis on Redistribution Strategies among Welfare States in Income Transfers and Social Services. Master’s thesis, Department of Social Welfare, Chonbuk National University.Google Scholar
  16. Ekert, O. (1986) ‘Effets et limites des aides financi~eres aux familles: une exp~erience et un mod~ele’. Population, 41 (2): 327–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Esping-Andersen, G. (1996) ‘Welfare States without Work: The Impasse of Labour Shedding and Familialism in Continental European Social Policy’. In G. Esping-Andersen (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies. New York and London: Sage 66–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Esping-Andersen, G. (2002) ‘A Child-Centred Social Investment Strategy’. In G. Esping-Andersen with D. Gallie, A. Hemerijck and J. Myles, Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press 26–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Evers, A. and Sachße, C. (2003) ‘Social Care Services for Children and Older People in Germany: Distinct and Separate Histories’. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipil~a (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 55–80.Google Scholar
  22. Gauthier, A.H. (1996) ‘The Measured and Unmeasured Effects of Welfare Benefits on Families: Implications for Europe’s Demographic Trends’. In D. Coleman (ed.), Europe’s Population in the 1990s. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 297–331.Google Scholar
  23. Heffernan, J. (2003) ‘Care for Children and Older People in the United States: Laggard or Merely Different?’. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipil~a (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 143–66.Google Scholar
  24. Hernes, H.M. (1987) Welfare States and Woman Power: Essays in State Feminism: Oslo: Norwegian University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Higgins, J. (1981) States of Welfare: Comparative Analysis in Social Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Hochschild, A.R. (2000) ‘The Nanny Chain’. The American Prospect, 11 (4): 32–6.Google Scholar
  27. Hort, S.E. O. (2003) ‘Back on Track—To the Future? The Making and Remaking of the Swedish Welfare State in the 1990s’. In N. Gilbert and R. A. Voorhis, (eds.), Changing Patterns of Social Protection. International Social Security Series, 9. New Brunswick and London: Transaction: 239–76.Google Scholar
  28. Knijn, T. and Kremer, M. (1997) ‘Gender and the Caring Dimension of Welfare States: Toward Inclusive Citizenship’. Social Politics, 4 (3): 328–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kröger, T. (1996) ‘Policy-Makers in Social Services in Finland: The Municipality and The state’. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 5 (2): 62–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lewis, J. (1992) ‘Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes’. Journal of European Social Policy, 2 (3): 159–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mahon, R. (2002) Child Care: Toward What Kind of ‘Social Europe?’. Social Politics, 9 (2): 343–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Midre, G. (1995) Bot, Bedring eller Brød? Om Bedømming of Behandling av Sosial Nød fra Reformasjonen til Velferdsstaten. Oslo: Universitets for laget. ( Cure, Improvement or Bread? On Judgements of Treatment of social Distress from the Reformation to the Welfare State.).Google Scholar
  33. Myrdal, G. and Myrdal, A. (1935) Kris i Befolkningsfrågan, 3rd edition. Stockholm: Albert Bonniers Förlag: ( Crisis in the Population Question. )Google Scholar
  34. OECD (1999) A Caring World. The New Social Policy Agenda. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  35. OECD (2001) Labour Force Statistics 1979–1999. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. OECD (2002) Online Social Expenditure Database 1980–1998. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  37. Palme, J., Bergmark, Å., Bäckman, O., Estrada, F., Fritzell, J., Lundberg, O., Sjöberg, O. and Szebehely, M. (2002) ‘Welfare Trends in Sweden: Balancing the Books for the 1990s’. Journal of European Social Policy, 12 (4): 329–46.Google Scholar
  38. Pateman, C. (1989) The Disorder of Women. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pfau-Effinger, B. (1998) ‘Gender Cultures and the Gender Arrangements. A Theoretical Framework for Cross National Gender Research’. Innovation, 11 (2): 147–66.Google Scholar
  40. Pierson, P. (2001) ‘Introduction: Investigating the Welfare State at Century’s End’. In P. Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rissanen, T. (2000) Naisten ansiotyömallin muotoutuminen. Työnteon, toimeentulon ja lasten hoidon järjestäminen Suomessa 1920–1980—luvuilla. Master’s dissertation. Tampere: University of Tampere, Department of Social Policy and Social Work. (The formation of women’s employment model. The organization of work, income and child care in Finland in the 1970–1990s.)Google Scholar
  42. Rose, R. (1989) Ordinary People in Public Policy: A Behavioural Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Rostgaard, T. and Fridberg, T. (1998) Caring for Children and Older People: A Comparison of European Policies and Practices. Copenhagen: The Danish National Institute of Social Research.Google Scholar
  44. Sainsbury, D. (1988) ‘The Scandinavian Model and Women’s Interests: The Issues of Universalism and Corporatism’. Scandinavian Political Studies, 11 (4): 337–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siim, B. (1993) ‘The Gendered Scandinavian Welfare States: The Interplay between Women’s Roles as Mothers, Workers and Citizens in Denmark’. in J. Lewis (ed.), Women and Social Policies in Europe: Work, Family and the State. Aldershot: Edward Elgar: 25–48.Google Scholar
  46. Sipilä, J., Andersson, M., Hammarqvist, S.-E., Nordlander, L., Rauhala, P.-L., Thomsen, K. and Warming Nielsen, H. (1997) ‘A Multitude of Universal, Public Services: How and Why did Four Scandinavian Countries get their Social Service Model?’. In J. Sipilä (ed.), Social Care Services: the Key to the Scandinavian Welfare Model. Aldershot: Avebury: 27–50.Google Scholar
  47. Sipilä, J., Anttonen, A. and Baldock, J. (2003) ‘The Importance of Social Care’. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock. and J. Sipilä (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 1–23.Google Scholar
  48. Sipilä, J. and Korpinen, J. (1998) ‘Cash versus Child Care Services in Finland’. Social Policy and Administration, 32 (3): 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stjernø, S. (1995) Mellom kirke og capital. Oslo: Universitets for laget. ( Between Church and Capital. )Google Scholar
  50. Takahashi, M. (2003) ‘Care of Children and Older People in Japan: Modernizing the traditional’. In A. Anttonen, J. Baldock and J. Sipil~a (eds.), The Young, the Old and the State: Social Care Systems in Five Industrial Societies. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar: 81–108.Google Scholar
  51. Therborn, G. (1995) European Modernity and Beyond: The Trajectory of European Societies 1945–2000. London and New Delhi: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vuorela, U. (2002) ‘Transnational Families: Imagined and Real Communities’. In D. Bryceson and U. Vuorela (eds.), The Transnational Family: New European Frontiers and Global Networks. New York: Berg: 63–82.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, F. (2003) Rethinking Care in Social Policy. Paper presented at the Conference of the Finnish Social Policy Association (Finland), Meetings, Joensuu, 24–25 October.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anneli Anttonen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations