Does the Most Brilliant Future of the ‘Nordic Model’ Have to be in the Past?

  • Olli Kangas
  • Joakim Palme
Part of the Social Policy in a Development Context book series (SPDC)

Abstract

We have in this book tried to explore the transformation of the Nordic countries in the twentieth century from a developmental perspective, with the focus on the role of social policy (cf. Mkandawire 2001). We have observed several reasons for why the emergence and transformation of the ‘Nordic model’ is of interest for the discussion of social policy in developmental perspective. One reason is simply that the Nordic countries have been successful in promoting social policy goals, reducing poverty and inequality while simultaneously increasing employment and social inclusion. We would argue that in the Nordic countries something similar to Schumpeter’s notion of a ‘constructive destruction’ has taken place. Another reason is that each of the Nordic countries is facing dilemmas that are in several respects common to countries in different parts of the world. This second reason is obviously more future oriented: what challenges do the transformation to an ‘information society’ and more global economies pose for the ‘Nordic model’?

Keywords

Migration Economic Crisis Europe Petroleum Income 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Burlamaqui, L., Castro, A.C. and Chang, H. -J. (eds.) (2000) Institutions and the Role of the State. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  2. Collier, P. and Dollar, D. (2001) Globalization, Growth, and Poverty: Building an Inclusive World Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press/World Bank.Google Scholar
  3. Deacon, B. with Hulse, M. and Stubbs, P. (1997) Global Social Policy: International Organizations and the Future of Welfare. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. DeMartino, G. (2000) Global Economy, Global Justice: Theoretical Objections and Policy Alternatives to Neoliberalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Douglas, M. (1987) How Institutions Think. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Erikson, R. Hansen, E.J. Ringen, S. and Uusitalo, H. (eds.) (1987) The Scandinavian Model. New York: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  7. Florida, R. and Tingali, I. (2002) Europe in the Creative Age. London: Carnegie Mellon and Demos.Google Scholar
  8. Hinrichs, K. and Kangas, O. (2003) ‘When is a Change Big Enough to be a System Shift?’. Social Policy and Administration, 37: 573–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Korpi, W. (1996) ‘Eurosclerosis and the Sclerosis of Objectivity: On the Role of Values among Economic Policy Experts’. Economic Journal, 106: 1727–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (1998) ‘The Paradox of Redistribution and the Strategy of Equality: Welfare State Institutions, Inequality and Poverty in the Western Countries’. American Sociological Review, 63: 661–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kuhnle, S. (2000) ‘European Welfare Lessons of the 1990s’. In S. Kuhnle (ed.), Survival of the European Welfare State. Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science. New York: Routledge: 234–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kuusi, P. (1966) Social Policy for the Sixties: A Plan for Finland. Helsinki: Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
  13. Leira, A. (2002) Working Parents and the Welfare State: Family Change and Policy Reform in Scandinavia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lundberg, U. (2003) Juvelen i kronanan: Socialdemokraterna och den allmanna pensionen. (The Jewel in the Crown: The Social Democrats and Statutory Pensions Stockholm: Hjalmarson & Häogberg.)Google Scholar
  15. Mkandawire, T. (2001) Social Policy in a Development Context. Geneva: United Nations, Research Institute for Social Development, Social Policy and Development Paper, 7.Google Scholar
  16. Myrdal, G. (1960) Beyond the Welfare State. London: University Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  17. North, D.C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. NOSOSCO (Nordic Social Statistical Committee) (2002) Social Protection in the Nordic Countries 2000. Copenhagen: NOSOSCO.Google Scholar
  19. NOU (2004) Modernizert folketrygd: Baerekreftig pensjon for framtida. (Modernized People’s Insurance: Sustainable Pensions for the Future.) Oslo: Norges Offentlige Utredningar.Google Scholar
  20. Okun, A. M. (1975) Equality andEfficiency: The Big Tradeoff. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  21. Palme, J., Koni, A., Pettinger, R., Predosanu, G. and Todorova, V. (1998) ‘Welfare State in Crisis: How to Protect the Rights Whilst Controlling the Costs’. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  22. Palme, J., Bergmark, Å., Bäckman, O., Estrada, F., Fritzell, J., Lundberg, O., Sj~oberg, O., Sommestad, L. and Szebehely, M. (2003) Welfare in Sweden: The Balance Sheet for the 1990s. Stockholm: Fritzes.Google Scholar
  23. Parpo, A. (2004) Kannustavuutta tulonsiirtojärjestelmään: tulonsiirtojärjestelmän muutokset, kannustinloukut ja tulonjako (More Incentives for the Income Transfer System: Changes in the Income Transfer System, Incentive Traps and Income Distribution). Helsinki: Stakes.Google Scholar
  24. Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  25. Rawls, J. (1999) The Law of People. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Rothstein, B. (1998) Just Institutions Matter: The Moral and Political Logic of the Universal Welfare State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. SOU (2001) Ur fattigdomsfällan. Slutbetänkande från familjeutredningen, 2001(24). Stockholm: Fritzes. ( Out of the Poverty Trap: Final report from the Family Support Commission. )Google Scholar
  28. Tanzi, V. and Schuknecht, L. (2000) Public Spending in the twentieth Century: A Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torfing, J. (1999)‘Workfare with Welfare: Recent Reforms of the Danish Welfare State’. Journal of European Social Policy, 9: 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Turner, A. (2001) Just Capital: The Liberal Economy. London: Macmillan. http://www.demos.co.uk/media/creativeeurope_page373.aspx; http://www.imd.ch/wcy/ranking/index.cfm.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olli Kangas
  • Joakim Palme

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations