Abstract
The late 1950s and 1960s saw an extraordinary boom in Soviet memoir and autobiographical writing. In 1967 (the 50th anniversary of Soviet power) more than 5000 titles of memoir books, brochures and articles were published.1 The Soviet women’s autobiographical sketches I am interested in were an important part of this boom. These vospominaniya or ocherki are collected in anthologies (sborniki) consisting of short narratives — each usually five to ten pages long — and referring to specific events. They are stories about heroic women, Russian and of other nationalities, fighting for a ‘bright future’, compiled as pieces of information (svedeniya) about the emancipation of Soviet women by the party/state. Such collections of sketches were published in 1959, 1963, 1968, 1975 and also in 1983. The rapid growth of this literature was considered an effect of social-historical and political circumstances:2 it was perceived as a vital, indeed revolutionary, new literary-documentary form associated with moral and spiritual renewal. According to N. I. Glushkov, the development of the genre was dictated by the cultural-historical experience of the new society. ‘The acknowledgement of the strength of the word’, he writes, ‘naturally accompanied people’s strivings to use it as an ideological weapon to influence their contemporaries’ way of thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
L. Ya. Garanin, Memuarnyi zhanr sovetskoi literatury: istoriko-teoreticheskii ocherk (Moscow, 1986), p. 3.
While the print run of the anthology published in 1959 was 100,000 copies, the equivalent figure for the anthology published in 1975 was 200,000 copies.
On the ‘essayistic literary’ genre in general, see ibid., and N. I. Glushkov, ‘Metodologiya sravnitel’no-istoricheskogo issledovaniya ocherkovoi prozy v sovremennoi teorii zhanra’, in Zhanrovo-stilevye problemy sovetskoi literatury (Kalinin, 1986), pp. 3–15; on its connections to ‘documentary’, see S. Zalygin, ‘Cherty dokumental’nosti’, Voprosy literatury, no. 2, 1970, pp. 41–53; to ‘documentary literature’, see N. Dikushina, ‘Nevydumannaya proza (0 sovremennoi dokumental’noi literature’, in Zhanrovo-stilevye problemy, pp. 149–74, and L. Ginzburg, ‘0 dokumental’noi literature i printsipakh postroeniya kharaktera’, Voprosy literatury, no. 7, 1970, pp. 62–91; and as sources of Soviet history, see V. S. Golubtsov, Memuary kak istochnik poistorii sovetskogo obshchestva (Moscow, 1970). See also M. Liljestrom, ‘Regimes of Truth? Soviet Women’s Autobiographical Texts and the Question of Censorship’, in M. Kangaspuro (ed.), Russia: More Different than Most (Helsinki. 20001, pp. 114–17.
G. Browning, Women and Politics in the USSR: Consciousness Raising and Soviet Women’s Groups (London, 1987), p. 56.
N. Tatarinova, Women in the USSR (Moscow, 1968), p. 97.
M. LiljestrOm, Emanciperade till underordning. Det sovjetiska konssystemets uppkomst och diskursiva reproduktion (Emancipated to Subordination: the Origin and Discursive Reproduction of the Soviet Gender System) (Turku, 1995), pp. 323–4.
A. Grigor’eva-Alekseeva, ‘V pervye v Rossii’, in Zhenshchiny v revolyutsii (Moscow, 1959), p. 93.
Ibid., p. 96.
A. Grigor’eva-Alekseeva, ‘Zhenskoe utro’, in Zhenshchiny goroda Lenina (Leningrad, 1963), p. 65.
M. Sveshnikova, ‘V organizatsii — sila!’ in Zhenshchiny goroda Lenina (Leningrad, 1963), p. 93.
Ibid., p. 98.
T. I. Lyutova, ‘Slovo k chitatelyu’, in Zhenshchiny goroda Lenina (Leningrad, 1963), p. 3.
S. Smith, ‘Constructing Truth in Lying Mouths: Truthtelling in Women’s Autobography’, in M. W. Brownley and A. B. Kimmich (eds), Women and Autobiography (Cornell, 1988), p. 38.
Ginzburg, op. cit., p. 63. See also I. Savkina, ‘Pishu sebya…’ Avtodokumnetal’nye zhenskie teksty v russkoi literature pervoi poloviny XIX veka (Tampere, 2001), pp. 26–7.
See L. Marcus, Autobiographical Discourses. Theory, Criticism, Practice (Manchester, 1994), p. 254.
M. Sveshnikova, ‘S mandatom delegatki Kronshtadta’, in Zhenshchiny v revolyutsii (Moscow, 1959), p. 205.
Ibid.
Susan E. Reid, ‘Masters of the Earth: Gender and Destalinisation in Soviet Reformist Painting of the Khrushchev Thaw’, Gender and History, vol. 11, no. 2, July 1999, p. 295.
P. Vail’ and A. Genis, 60-e. Mir sovetskogo cheloveka (Ann Arbor, 1988), pp. 107, 111.
Ibid., p. 112.
J. Perreault, Writing Selves. Contemporary Feminist Autobiography (Minnesota, 1995), p. 7. See also D. Sommer, ‘“Not Just a Personal Story”: Women’s Testimonios and the Plural Self’, in B. Brodzki and C. Schenk (eds), Life/Lines. Theorizing Women’s Autobiography (Cornell, 1988), p. 108.
K-G. Karlsson, Historia sorn vapen. Historiebruk och Sovjetunionens upplosning, 1985–1995 (History as a Weapon. The Use of History and the Collapse of the Soviet Union) (Stockholm, 1999), p. 90.
R. W. Davies, Soviet History in the Gorbachev Revolution (London, 1989), p. 115. See also Reid, op. cit., p. 281.
Vail’ and Glenis, op. cit., pp. 199–200. See also C. Lane, The Rites of Rulers. Ritual in Industrial Society — the Soviet Case (Cambridge, 1981), p. 218.
M. Liljestrom, ‘The Remarkable Revolutionary Woman: Rituality and Performativity in Soviet Women’s Autobiographical Texts from the 1970s’, in M. Liljestrom et al. (eds), Models of Self Russian Women’s Autobiographical Texts (Helsinki, 2000), pp. 95–8.
O. Kharkhordin, The Collective and the Individual in Russia: a Study of Practices (Berkeley, 1999), p. 279.
In 1962 the Committee of Party-State Control was formed. It unified a number of separate bodies that had existed since 1934 into a single overarching agency. See J. S. Adams, Citizen Inspectors in the Soviet Union (New York, 1977), p. 185.
Kharkhordin, op. cit., p. 280. As a result of the ‘anti-parasite’ campaign, the ‘law against idlers’ was adopted in 1961. According to this law, an individual not legally registered at a job could be sentenced to forced labour. See P. H. Juviler, Revolutionary Law and Order (New York, 1976), p. 78.
The first victims of conformism as enforced by the masses were the stilyagi. By the early 1960s they were apparently all reformed. When they appeared there were still spaces in the grid of mutual surveillance. Under Khrushchev these spaces were successfully eliminated as part of his policies of expanding socialist self-government. See A. Troitsky, Back in the USSR (Boston, 1988), p. 10, and Kharkhordin, op. cit., pp. 289–91.
Liljestrom, Emanciperade till underordning, pp. 357–67, and S. E. Reid, ‘Cold War in the Kitchen: Gender and the De-Stalinization of Consumer Taste in the Soviet Union under Khrushchev’, Slavic Review, vol. 61, no. 2, 2002, pp. 232–3.
A. Cavarero, Relating Narratives: Storytelling and Selfhood (London, 2000), pp. 32–3.
Ibid., p. 35.
Ibid., p. 36.
Ibid., p. 41.
J. Butler, ‘Ruled Out: Vocabularies of the Censor’, in R. C. Post (ed.), Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation (Los Angeles, 1998), pp. 247–9. See also Liljestrom, ‘Regimes of Truth’.
I am inspired here by Liz Stanley’s thoughts on audit selves, which she develops in another context . See L. Stanley, ‘From “Self-made Women” to “Women’s Made-selves”? Audit Selves, Simulation and Surveillance in the Rise of Public Woman’, in T. Cosslett, C. Lury and P. Summerfield (eds), Feminism and Autobiography: Texts, Theories, Methods (London, 2000), pp. 40–60.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Melanie Ilič, Susan E. Reid & Lynne Attwood
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liljeström, M. (2004). Monitored Selves: Soviet Women’s Autobiographical Texts in the Khrushchev Era. In: Ilič, M., Reid, S.E., Attwood, L. (eds) Women in the Khrushchev Era. Studies in Russian and East European History and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523432_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523432_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51469-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52343-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)