Advertisement

Centres and Margins: The Fall of Universal History and the Rise of Multicultural World History

  • Ricardo Duchesne
Part of the Palgrave Advances book series (PAD)

Abstract

The liberal idea that human history could be comprehended as a rational process, having an intelligible order, which could be described in terms of successive stages of cognitive/technical and moral knowledge, commanded wide credence in the West from the Enlightenment onwards until the 1960s. While there were many interpretations about the forces which governed the process of history, and the kind of stages one would expect to find, not many world historians doubted that it was their business to construct a universal scheme into which all of human history could be fitted. This directional view, it is true, sometimes came together with odious assumptions of racial hierarchy. ‘We are fully authorized to say’, wrote William Swinton in his Outline of the World’s History, published in 1874, ‘that the Aryans are peculiarly the race of progress.’ Similarly, Philip Myers, in a popular high school textbook he wrote in 1889, offered a narrative of progress with racial references to the ‘the White, or Caucasian race’ as ‘by far the most perfect type, physically, intellectually, and morally’.1 Myers did remove these racist remarks from later editions, but the liberal idea that civilization was moving in a desirable direction continued to be heavily infused with imperious attitudes toward cultures and peoples believed to be outside the mainstream of cultural progression.

Keywords

Western Civilization Human History World History European History Liberal Idea 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Recommended Resources

  1. Bentley, J., Shapes of World History in Twentieth-Century Scholarship (Washington, DC: American Historical Association, 1996).Google Scholar
  2. Braudel, F., A History of Civilizations (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995).Google Scholar
  3. Breasted, J. H., The Conquest of Civilization (New York: Harper and Brothers, 1954 [1926]).Google Scholar
  4. Bury, J. B., The Idea of Progress: An Inquiry into its Origin and Growth (New York: Dover, 1960).Google Scholar
  5. Childe, V. G., What Happened in History (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1964 [1942]).Google Scholar
  6. Duchesne, R., ‘On the Rise of the West: Researching Kenneth Pomeranz’s Great Divergence’, Review ofRadical Political Economics 36(1) (2004) [in press].Google Scholar
  7. Dunn, R. (ed.), The New World History: A Teacher’s Companion (New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2000).Google Scholar
  8. Frank, A. G., Latin America: Underdevelopment or Revolution (New York: M. R. Press, 1969).Google Scholar
  9. Horkheimer, M., and Adorno, T., Dialectic of Enlightenment (Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press, 1980).Google Scholar
  10. Manning, P., Navigating World History: Historians Create a Global Past (New York: Palgrave Macmillan/St. Martin’s Press, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Roberts, J. M., The Penguin History of the World (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1995 [1976]).Google Scholar
  12. Rostow, W. W., The Stages of Economic Growth: A Non-Communist Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1960).Google Scholar
  13. Wallerstein, I., Unthinking Social Science, The Limits of Nineteenth-Century Paradigms (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  14. Wells, H. G., The Outline of History (London: George Newnes, 1920).Google Scholar
  15. Windschuttle, K., ‘The Ethnocentrism of Clifford Geertz’ New Criterion 21(2) (October 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Duchesne

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations