Macroeconomic Policies: a Self-defeating Regime

  • Jörg Huffschmid

Abstract

This chapter begins by outlining the road to monetary union, and the steps along the way to monetary union with the formation of the European Monetary System and attempts to secure exchange rate stability between European currencies. Attention is given to the movements in the real exchange rates between EU countries and the effects which those had on economic performance. The road to the single currency was very much shaped by the Maastricht convergence criteria. The macroeconomic policies within the Eurozone (under the Stability and Growth Pact) are closely related to the convergence criteria with respect to the constraints on budget deficits and the ‘independence’ of the European Central Bank. The second half of the chapter provides a critique of those macroeconomic policies which have placed such drastic constraints on the growth dynamics of most European countries. The price which has been paid for the EMU has been particularly heavy in terms of unemployment and low levels of economic activity as evident from the statistics given in the previous chapter.

Keywords

Migration Europe Income Coherence Tral 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arestis, P., A. Brown and M. Sawyer, The Euro: Evolution and Prospects (Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buti, M., D. Franco and H. Ongena, Budgetary Policies during Recessions: Retrospective Application of the ‘Stability and Growth Pact’ to the Post-War Period (Brussels, 1997).Google Scholar
  3. Cadiou, L., S. Guichard and M. Maurel, ‘Ajustements sur les marchés du travail en Europe’, Document de travail, CEPII (May 1999).Google Scholar
  4. Couharde, C. and J. Mazier, ‘The Equilibrium Exchange Rates of European Currencies and the Transition to Euro’, Applied Economics, Vol. 33 (2001) pp. 1795–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davanne, O., L’instabilité du système financier international, Rapport du Conseil d’Analyse Economique, No. 14 (Paris: Documentation Française, 1998).Google Scholar
  6. European Commission (MacDougall report), Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finance in European Integration (Brussels: European Commission, 1977).Google Scholar
  7. European Commission, European Economy, Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, No. 53 (1993).Google Scholar
  8. European Commission, ‘Public Finances in EMU — 2000’, European Economy — Reports and Studies, No. 3 (Brussels, 2000).Google Scholar
  9. Fontagné, L., M. Freudenberg and N. Péridy, ‘Intra-industry Trade and the Single Market: Quality Matters’, CEPR discussion paper, No. 1953 (1998).Google Scholar
  10. Italianer, A. and J. Pisani-Ferry, ‘Systèmes budgétaires et amortissement des chocs régionaux: implications pour l’Union économique et monétaire’, Economie internationale, No. 51, 3rd trimestre (1992).Google Scholar
  11. Mazier, J., J. Oudinet and S. Saglio, ‘La flexibilité des prix relatifs et la mobilité du travail en Union monétaire: une comparaison Europe-Etats-Unis’, Revue de l’OFCE, No. 83 (October 2002).Google Scholar
  12. Melitz, J. and F. Zumer, ‘Redistribution régionale et stabilisation par le gouvernement central’, Economie internationale, No. 75, 3rd trimestre (1998).Google Scholar
  13. Midelfart-Knarvik, K. H., H. G. Overman, S. J. Redding and A. J. Venables, ‘The Location of European Industry’, European Commission, Economic Papers, No. 12 (2000).Google Scholar
  14. Sterdyniak, H. and P. Villa, ‘Régimes de change et coordination des politiques économiques en Europe’, Revue de l’OFCE, No. 43 (January 1993).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Huffschmid
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations