Advertisement

Pathways to a Sustainable Europe

  • Jörg Huffschmid

Abstract

The difficulties of articulating and implementing environmental policy in the EU (and elsewhere) demonstrate the dilemma of an economy and of a society dependent on the supply of fossil energy to achieve productivity increases, to improve competitiveness and to stimulate economic growth. Given the dominant technological trajectory, it is very likely that alternative renewable energies and technical devices will only permit slower growth, with more decentralized economic structures and smaller units of production. The transition to renewable energies requires the establishment of a new time-and-space regime. Therefore ecological sustainability is not simply compatible with economic sustainability, taking the dominant paradigm of production and consumption, of labour and life conditions for granted. The ‘win-win’ constellation, centrepiece of the environmental policy of the EU Commission, will therefore not be easily achieved and may turn out to be impossible. The basic assumption of a reconciliation between environmental requirements and economic necessities has to be replaced by a policy concept which aims in the long run not only at increasing the efficiency of ecological transformations (‘efficiency revolution’) but also at the transformation of production and consumption patterns (‘sufficiency revolution’), including transport systems, urban structures, agricultural systems and — last but not least — day-to-day human behaviour.

Keywords

Renewable Energy Environmental Policy Precautionary Principle United Nations Environmental Programme Fossil Energy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and bibliography

  1. Altvater, E., Der Preis des Wohlstands oder Umweltplünderung und neue Welt(un)ordnung (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 1992).Google Scholar
  2. Altvater, E. and B. Mahnkopf, Grenzen der Globalisierung. Ökonomie, Politik, Ökologie in der Weltgesellschaft (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2003).Google Scholar
  3. Braithwaite, J. and P. Drahos, Global Business Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  4. Dingier, J., Postmoderne und Nachhaltigkeit: eine diskurstheoretische Analyse der sozialen Konstruktion von nachhaltiger Entwicklung (Munich: ökom-Verlag, 2003).Google Scholar
  5. European Commission, Commission Staff Working Document, ‘The Share of Renewable Energy in the EU Country Profiles, Overview of Renewable Energy Sources in the Enlarged European Union’, COM (2004) 366 final, 2004.Google Scholar
  6. European Environmental Agency (EEA) Greenhouse Gas Emission Trends and Projections in Europe 2003. Summary. Tracking Progress by the EU and Acceding and Candidate Countries towards Achieving their Kyoto Protocol Targets (Copenhagen, 2003).Google Scholar
  7. Harremoës, P., D. Gee and M. MacGarvin, ‘Late Lessons from Early Warnings: the Precautionary Principle 1896–2000’, in: Environmental Issue Report, No. 22 (2002).Google Scholar
  8. International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2004 (Paris, 2004).Google Scholar
  9. Jonas, H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung — Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation (Frankfurt: Insel Verlag, 1979).Google Scholar
  10. Kapp, K. W., The Social Costs of Private Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1950).Google Scholar
  11. Kok, W., Facing the Challenge. The Lisbon Strategy for Growth and Employment, Report from the High Level Group chaired by Wim Kok, November 2004 (http://europa.eu.int/comm/lisbon_strategy/pdf/2004–1866-EN-complet.pdf).Google Scholar
  12. Scheer, H., Solare Weltwirtschaft. Strategien für die ökologische Moderne (Munich: Kunstmann-Verlag, 1999).Google Scholar
  13. UNEP (ed.), Global Environment Outlook 3. Past, Present and Future Perspectives (Nairobi: UNEP, Earthscan, 2002).Google Scholar
  14. WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen), Welt im Wandel. Energiewende zur Nachhaltigkeit (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Huffschmid
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations