Taming European Finance: Stability, Efficiency and Inclusion

  • Jörg Huffschmid

Abstract

A large and well-functioning European financial market could be a considerable achievement for the European economy and beneficial for the European Social Model. It promotes financial stability, facilitates access to the payment and credit system for individuals and enterprises and contributes to efficient economic development while giving better services to consumers. But integrated financial markets do not automatically generate these positive effects. As argued in Chapter 4, the current, almost exclusive, concentration of financial market policies in the EU on size, speed and the reduction of transaction costs is working in the opposite direction — towards instability, economic inefficiency and social exclusion. To ensure the positive effects of a single financial market in Europe a political framework for, and political intervention into, the market mechanism are required. This applies to all EU members, and especially to the new members of the EU, whose financial systems are comparatively underdeveloped and largely in foreign hands, increasing their vulnerability (see Cavaglia et al., 2002, pp. 15–30). Financial stability needs strong supervision of financial institutions and safeguards against both monetary chain reactions and excessive financial speculation. Efficient economic development requires the continuous provision of credit to a broad range of firms and to public institutions pursuing regional and structural development goals not served by markets. Social inclusion in

Keywords

Europe Income Marketing Volatility Guaran 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bach, S., ‘Kapitaleinkommensbesteuerung zwischen Wettbewerb und Harmonisierung’, in: W. Müller, O. Fromm, B. Hansjürgens (eds), Regeln für den europäischen Systemwettbewerb. Steuern und soziale Sicherungssysteme (Marburg: Metropolis, 2001) pp. 105–32.Google Scholar
  2. Boyer, R., M. Dehove and D. Plihon, Financial Crises. Analysis and Proposals (Paris: Documentation Française, 2004).Google Scholar
  3. Cavalia, C., G. Krause and Ch. Thimann, ‘Key Features of the Financial Sectors in EU Accession Countries’, in: Ch. Thimann (ed.), Financial Sectors in EU Accession Countries (ECB, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, Official Journal of the European Union L142 of 30.4.2004, pp. 12–23.Google Scholar
  5. Eichengreen, B., Financial Crises and What to Do about Them (Oxford: OUP, 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. European Commission, Proposal for a Directive on the Harmonisation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States Concerning Credit for Consumers, Com (2002) 443 final (Brussels, 11 September 2002).Google Scholar
  7. Grahl, J., J. Huffschmid and D. Plihon, Europäische Finanzmärkte. Struktur, Entwicklung, Politik, Probleme und Alternativen (Brussels, 2002).Google Scholar
  8. Kindleberger, Ch. P., Manias, Panics and Crashes. A History of Financial Crises, 3rd edn (London: Macmillan, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. New Rules for Global Finance Coalition (ed.), Debating the Tobin Tax (Washington DC, November 2003).Google Scholar
  10. Spahn, P. B., Zur Durchführbarkeit einer Devisentransaktionssteuer, Gutachten im Auftrag des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (Frankfurt a. M., 2002).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Huffschmid
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations