Advertisement

Fiscal Policies: Stronger Coordination and Higher EU Budget

  • Jörg Huffschmid

Abstract

There are at least three reasons why fiscal policies must be considerably strengthened at the EU level. Firstly, the current internal state of persistent macroeconomic weakness and increasing social polarization can only be overcome through strong political intervention. Secondly, the close interlinkages between member states have the dual effect of making isolated actions by individual member countries increasingly ineffective and of reinforcing the effectiveness of joint action. Thirdly, such joint action is also required to strengthen the external position of the EU in the world and helps to shape the profile of the EU as an attractive alternative to the US development model.

Keywords

Fiscal Policy Public Debt Strong Coordination Asymmetric Shock Monetary Policy Committee 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arestis, P. and M. Sawyer, ‘On Fiscal Policy and Budget Deficits’, Intervention, Vol. 2 (2004) pp. 61–74.Google Scholar
  2. Bayoumi, T. and P. R. Masson, ‘Fiscal Flows in the United States and Canada: Lessons for Monetary Union in Europe’, European Economic Review, Vol. 39 (1995) pp. 253–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Commission of the European Communities, Report of the Study Group on the Role of Public Finances in European Integration, chaired by Sir Donald MacDougall, Economic and Financial Series, No. A13 (Brussels, 1977).Google Scholar
  4. European Commission, Directorate General IX, Budgets, Outlook for financing, forecasts and budget guarantees, Financing the European Union. Commission Report on the Operation of the Own Resources System (Brussels, October 1998).Google Scholar
  5. FESE, Federation of European Securities Exchanges, European Securities Exchange Statistic, December 2003 (www.fese.org/statistiscs/monthly_statistics/factsheets/2003/december2003/pdf).
  6. Goodhart, Ch. A. E. and St Smith, ‘Stabilization’, European Economy, Reports and Studies No. 5/1993, The Economics of Community Public Finance, pp. 417–55.Google Scholar
  7. Italianer, A. and M. Vanheukelen, ‘Proposals for Community Stabilization Mechanisms: Some Historical Applications’, European Economy, Reports and Studies, No. 5/1993, The Economics of Community Public Finance, pp. 493–510.Google Scholar
  8. Kenen, P. B., Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. Moving beyond Maastricht (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Musgrave, R. A., ‘Should We Have a Capital Budget?’ Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 45 (1963) p. 21, reprint in: R. A. Musgrave, Public Finance in a Democratic Society, Vol. I, Social Goods, Taxation and Fiscal Policy (Oxford: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd, 1986) pp. 370–4.Google Scholar
  10. Schratzenstaller, M., ‘Corporate Taxation in Europe — Possibilities, Problems and Options for Reform’. Paper prepared for the Workshop of the Network of Alternative Economists in Europe (Stockholm: www.memo-europe.uni-bremen.de, April 2000).Google Scholar
  11. Werner report, Report to the Council and the Commission on the Realisation by Stages of Economic and Monetary Union in the Community, Bulletin of the European Communities, Supplement 11/1970 (Luxembourg).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jörg Huffschmid
    • 1
  1. 1.University of BremenGermany

Personalised recommendations