Agricultural Policy: the Need for Reform
The Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) is criticized by pro-free trade liberals and supporters of developing countries’ farmers, as much for its agricultural productivism as for absorbing an excessive share of the EU budget. Its advocates are often presented as backward-looking supporters of corporatist interests and declining sectors. However, although no one today questions the need for radical reforms, the situation is quite complex and not as clear-cut as is often claimed. Agricultural policies have proved their efficiency, even if pernicious effects began to appear (and to be corrected). It is usually suggested that the market is the only way out of the current difficulties; this does not provide a satisfactory answer, however, and provides hardly any solution for the problems of agriculture in developing countries.
KeywordsSugar Europe Income Coherence Cane
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References and bibliography
- Allaire, G. and T. Dupeuple, ‘De la multifonctionnalité de l’activité agricole à la multiévaluation de la production agricole’, Economie Rurale (June 2003) pp. 131–56.Google Scholar
- Boussard, J. M., ‘Commerce, développement et volatilité des prix agricoles’, mimeo, INRA (2003).Google Scholar
- Carfantan, J. Y., La mondialisation déloyale (Fayard, 2002).Google Scholar
- Pouch, T., ‘L’agriculture entre théorie et histoire ou qu’est-ce qu’une politique agricole?’, Economie Appliquée, Vol. 55, No. 1 (2002) pp. 167–94.Google Scholar
- Pouch, T., ‘La PAC et l’OMC: éléments de cadrage’, mimeo, Université de Marne la Vallée, OEP (2003).Google Scholar
- Pouch, T. and C. de Lorgeril, ‘La dynamique des échanges de produits agroalimentaires (1967–2000)’, Economie et Sociétés, AG No. 26 (2004) pp. 507–29.Google Scholar
- Sapir, A., An Agenda for a Gassing Europe. Report for the President of the European Commission (2003).Google Scholar
- Saraceno, E., ‘Rural Development Policies and the Second Pillar of the CAP’, mimeo (2002).Google Scholar