Abstract
Over the last two decades there has been a radical restructuring of schooling in Britain. Two key features of these reforms have been the application of market-force principles to the provision of education and the introduction into schools of management practices more usually associated with the private sector. The restructuring, heavily inspired by public choice theory, is based partly upon the contention that giving school managers the freedom to manage and subjecting schools to the disciplines of the market will result in higher standards. Moreover, it is assumed that where schools under-perform in a devolved system of educational governance, this can be attributed to deficient management at the school level. Findings from research into school effectiveness and improvement are used in attempts to lend credibility to this view. In this chapter, I want to suggest that policies that focus on a combination of markets and managerial devices as the route to raising the performance of schools ignore the complex, varied and sometimes subtle interplay between schools and the social, material and discursive environments within which they operate. I will argue that what managers and teachers do, or can do, in schools are necessarily heavily influenced, and constrained, by the nature of the school’s locality and by dominant educational discourses.
This is a revised and extended version of ‘Can All Schools Be Successful?: An exploration of the determinants of school “success”’, published in the Oxford Review of Education, 1998, 24 (4).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ball, S.J. 1998. ‘Performativity and fragmentation in “post-modern schooling”’, in Carter, J. (ed.), Post-Modernity and Fragmentation of Welfare: A Contemporary Social Policy. London: Routledge.
Blunkett, D. 1999. ‘Do we want to bus the middle class?’, Guardian. 16 September.
Chubb, J.E. and Moe, T.M. 1990. Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Gewirtz, S. 1997. ‘Post-welfarism and the reconstruction of Teachers’ Work in the UK’, Journal of Education Policy, 12 (4): 217–31.
Gewirtz, S. Ball, S. and Bowe, R. 1995. Markets, Choice and Equity in Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Hatcher, R. 1998. ‘Labour, Official School Improvement and Equality’, Journal of Education Policy, 13 (4): 485–499.
Mortimore, P. 1997. ‘Can Effective Schools Compensate for Society?’, in Halsey, A.H. Lauder, H. Brown, P. and Wells, A.S. (eds), Education: Culture, Economy, Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
NCE (National Commission on Education) 1995. Success Against the Odds: Effective Schools in Disadvantaged Areas. London: Routledge.
Reynolds, D. and Packer, A. 1992. ‘School Effectiveness and School Improvement in the 1990s’, in Reynolds, D. and Cuttance, P. (eds), School Effectiveness: Research, Policy and Practice. London: Cassell.
Stoll, L. 1995. ‘The Complexity and Challenge of Ineffective Schools’, paper presented to the European Conference on Educational Research and the Annual Conference of the Educational Research Association, Bath.
Thrupp, M. 1998. ‘The Art of the Possible: Organizing and Managing High and Low Socio-economic Schools’. Journal of Education Policy, 13 (2): 197–219.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gewirtz, S. (2002). School Markets and Locality: an Exploration of Difference in the English Education Market Place. In: Hudson, C., Lidström, A. (eds) Local Education Policies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523388_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523388_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-41888-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52338-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)