Abstract
Traditional governance research tends to treat political units of governance, such as the polity, as pre-given. The polity is perceived as the framework for governance processes rather than its outcome. This traditional perception of the role of the polity in governance processes is closely linked to core ideas of the traditional research approach of the ‘old’ institutionalism, according to which governance is perceived as the activities that take place within formal governance institutions (March and Olsen, 1989, pp. 1-2). The image of the polity as pre-given is also found in traditional theories of liberal democracy, which are concerned with the regulation of governance processes that apply to a clearly demarcated people.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Duverger, Maurice (1959) Political Parties (London, Methuen).
Finer, H. (1932) The Theory and Practice of Modern Government (2 vols) (London, Methuen).
Hajer, M. A. (2003) ‘Policy without Polity? Policy Analysis and the Institutional Void’, Policy Sciences, 36, pp. 175–95.
Hall, P. A., and Taylor, C. R. (1996) ‘Political Science and the Three New Institutional-isms’, paper presented at MPIFG Scientific Board.
Hansen, A. D. (2000) ‘Diskursteori, demokrati og lokaludvalg’, PhD thesis, Københavns Universitet.
Hansen, A. D. (2003a) ‘Diskursteori — konstruktivisme og negativitet’, in A. D. Hansen and K. Sehested (eds), Konstruktive hidrag: Om teori og metode in konstruktivistisk videnskab (Frederiksberg, Roskilde Universitetsforlag).
Hansen, A. D. (2003b) ‘Diskursteori i et videnskabsteoretisk perspektiv’, in L. Fulgsang and P. B. Olsen (eds), Videnskabsteori i samfundsvidenskaberne: På tvœrs af fagkulturer og paradigmer (Frederiksberg, Roskilde Universitetsforlag).
Hansen, A. D., and Neufeld, J. J. (2000) ‘Vi kan selv: Politisk demokratisk faellesskab under governance betingelser’, in H. Bang, A. D. Hansen, and J. Hoff (eds), Demokrati fra neden: Casestudier fra en dansk kommune (København, Jurist og Økonomforbundets Forlag).
Hirst, P., and Thompson, G. (1996) Globalization in Question (Cambridge, Polity Press).
Hjern, B., and Porter, D. (1981) ‘Implementation Structures: a New Unit of Analysis’, Organizational Studies, vol. 2, pp. 211–27.
Jessop, B. (1998) ‘The Rise of Governance and the Risk of Failure: the Case of Economic Development’, Unesco/155 (London, Blackwell Publishers).
Johnson, Nevil (1973) Government in the Federal Republic of Germany: the Executive at Work (Oxford, Pergamon Press).
Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation(s) (London, Verso).
Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London, Verso).
March, J. G, and Olsen, J. P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: the Organizational Basis of Politics (New York, The Free Press).
March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1995) Democratic Governance (New York, The Free Press).
Mayntz, R. (1999) ‘New Challenges to Governance Theory’ (paper, Max-Planck Institut für Gesellshaftsforschung).
Neufeld, J. J. (1999) ‘Village Idiots? A Study of a Village Council and Its Significance for the Local (Political) Community’ (Dissertation, Department of Social Sciences, Roskilde University).
Pierre, J. (2000) Debating Governance: Authority, Steering, and Democracy (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
Powell, Walter W., and Dimaggio, Paul J. (1991) ‘Introduction’, in Powell and Dimaggio (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1995) ‘The Study of Political Institutions’, in G. Stoker and D. Marsh (eds), Theories and Methods in Political Science (London, Macmillan, now Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 47–65.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability (Buckingham, Open University Press).
Scharpf, F. W. (1994) ‘Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiations’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1 (6), pp. 27–53.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-centred Institutionalism in Policy Research (Oxford, West View Point).
Silverman, D. (2001) Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction (London, Sage).
Taylor S. (2001) ‘Locating and Conducting Discourse Analytic Research’, in M. Wethereil, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates (eds), Discourse as Data (London, The Open University).
Van Heffen, O., Kickert W. J. M., and Thomassen, J. J. A. (2000) Governance in Modem Society (Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers).
Yates, S. J. (2001) ‘Researching Internet Interaction: Sociolinguistics and Corpus Analysis’, in M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, and S. J. Yates (eds), Discourse as Data (London, The Open University).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hansen, A.D., Sørensen, E. (2005). Polity as Politics: Studying the Shaping and Effects of Discursive Polities. In: Howarth, D., Torfing, J. (eds) Discourse Theory in European Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523364_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-1719-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52336-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)