European Integration and Security: Analysing French and German Discourses on State, Nation, and Europe

  • Ole Wcever


An analysis of domestic discourses regarding ‘we’concepts, like state, nation, and Europe in the major European states can explain and, up to a point, predict developments in their over-all policies on security and Europe. Therefore, it explains big patterns (but not details) in European integration.


European Union Foreign Policy European Integration Discourse Analysis German State 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alker, H. (1996) Rediscoveries and Reformulations: Humanistic Methodologies for International Relations (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1983) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (2nd revised edition, 1991) (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  3. Ash, T. G. (1993) In Europe’s Name: Germany and the Divided Continent (New York, Vintage).Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, S. (n.d.) ‘National Identity and Foreign Policy’ (unpublished).Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, S. (1997) ‘The Cultural Logic of National Identity Formation: Contending Discourses in Late Colonial India’, in V. M. Hudson (ed.), Culture and Foreign Policy, (Boulder, Colorado, Lynne Rienner).Google Scholar
  6. Bartelson, J. (1995) ? Genealogy of Sovereignty (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertramsen, R. B., J. P. F. Thomsen, and J. Torfing (1991) State, Economy and Society (London, Unwin Hyman).Google Scholar
  8. Bohrer, K. H. (1990–91) ‘Provinzialismus’, Merkur (501), pp. 1,096-1,102; (504), pp. 255-62; (505), pp. 48-56; (509), pp. 719-27; (512), pp. 1,059-68.Google Scholar
  9. Brunner, J. (1991) ‘The Narrative Construction of Reality’, Critical Inquiry, 18 (2), pp. 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buzan, B., and O. Wæver (2003) Regions and Powers: the Structure of International Security (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chirac, J. (2004) Allocution lors de la presentation des voeux du corps diplomatique, available at (viewed 8 January 2004).
  12. Christensen, T. J. (1993) ‘Conclusion, System Stability and the Security of the Most Vulnerable Significant Actor’, in J. Snyder and R. Jervis (eds), Coping with Complexity in the International System (Boulder, San Francisco; Oxford, Westview Press).Google Scholar
  13. Dalgaard-Nielsen, A. (2003) ‘Gulf War: the German Resistance’, Survival, 45 (1), pp. 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Derrida, J., and J. Habermas (2003) ‘Nach dem Krieg: die Wiedergeburt Europas/Europe: plaidoyer pour une politique étrangère commune’, Frankfurter Allgemeinen Zeitung and Libération, 31 May 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Diez, T. (1999) Die EU lesen: Diskursive Knotenpunkte in der britischen Europadebatte (Opladen, Leske & Budrich).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dreyfus, H. L., and P. Rabinow (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  17. Elshtain, J. B. (1987) Women and War (New York, Basic Books).Google Scholar
  18. Fischer, J. (2000) ‘Vom Staatenverbund zur Föderation — Gedanken über die Finalität der europäischen Integration’, speech on 12 May 2000, at the Humboldt University, Berlin, available at
  19. Foucault, M. (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (London, Pantheon).Google Scholar
  20. Gellner, Ernst (1983) ‘Nationalism and the Two Forms of Cohesion in Complex Societies’, Proceedings of the British Academy, London vol. LXVIII (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Giesen, B. (1993) Die Intellektuellen und die Nation: eine deutsche Achsenzeit (Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
  22. Grosser, A. (1980[1978]) The Western Alliance: European-American Relations since 1945 (translated by Michael Shaw) (French original 1978; New York, Continuum).Google Scholar
  23. Hacke, C. (2002) ‘Die Außenpolitik der Regierung Schröder/Fischer: Zwischenbilanz und Perspektiven’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B48, pp. 7–15.Google Scholar
  24. Hansen, L. (1996) ‘Slovenian Identity: State Building on the Balkan Border’, Alternatives, vol. 21 (4), pp. 473–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen, L. (forthcoming) Security as Practice: Discourse Analysis and the Bosnian War (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, L., and O. Waever (eds) (2002) European Integration and National Identity: the Challenge of the Nordic States (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  27. Harnisch, S. (2000) ‘Deutsche Außenpolitik nach der Wende: Zivilmacht am Ende’?, paper for 21st DVPW Congress, Halle, in October 2000.Google Scholar
  28. Hellmann, G. (1996) ‘Goodbye Bismarck? The Foreign Policy of Contemporary Germany’, Mershon International Studies Review, vol. 40, supplement 1, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hellmann, G. (2002) ‘Deutschland in Europa: eine symbiotische Beziehung’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B48, pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
  30. Hellmann, G. (2003) ‘Agenda 2020: Krise und Perspektive deutscher Außenpolitik’, Internationale Politik, 2003 (9), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
  31. Hellmann, G. (2004a) ‘Wider die machtpolitische Resozialiseriung der deutschen Außenpolitik: ein Plädoyer für offensiven Idealismus’, WeltTrends (42) April, pp. 79–88.Google Scholar
  32. Hellmann, G. (2004b) ‘Von Gipfelstürmern und Gratwandern: “Deutsche Wege” in der Außenpolitik’, Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte, B11, pp. 32–9.Google Scholar
  33. Holm, U. (1992) Det Franske Europa (The French Europe) (Aarhus, Aarhus University Press).Google Scholar
  34. Holm, U. (1996) ‘Den franske nationalstat: en urolig magt’, Militœrt Tidsskrift, vol. 125 (1), pp. 53–68.Google Scholar
  35. Holm, U. (1997) ‘The French Garden Is Not What It Used to Be’, in K.-E. Jørgensen (ed.), Reflective Approaches to European Governance (London, Macmillan).Google Scholar
  36. Holm, U. (1999) ‘Det franske Europa: Et retrospektivt perspektiv. Metode og teori’, PhD dissertation, University of Aarhus.Google Scholar
  37. Holm, U. (2002) The Implication of the Concept of the French State-Nation and ‘Patrie’ for French Discourses on (Maghrehi) Immigration, AMID Working Paper Series (6) (Aalborg University, Academy for Migration Studies in Denmark).Google Scholar
  38. Holm, U. (2003) The French Concept of Europe — Before, Now and in the Future’, lecture to Master Course on European Studies, 17 September 2003. Holm, U. (forthcoming) ? Study on Algeria.Google Scholar
  39. Holm, U., H. Larsen, and O. Waever (1990) ‘Forestillingen om Europa: en Studie i fransk og tysk taenkning efter revolutionerne i Øst’, Vandkunsten: Konflikt, Politik og Historie (3), pp. 212–36.Google Scholar
  40. Jachtenfuchs, M., T. Diez, and S. Jung (1999) ‘Which Europe? Conflicting Models of a Legitimate European Order’, European Journal of International Relations, 4 (4), pp. 409–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Joenniemi, P. (1993) ‘Euro-Suomi: rajalla, rajojen, välissä vai rajaton?’, in P. Joenniemi, R. Alapuro, and K. Pekonen, Suomesta Euro-Suomen: Keitä me olemme ja mihin matkalla, Tampere: Occasional Papers of Tampere Peace Research Institute (53).Google Scholar
  42. Kazan, I. (1994) ‘Omvendt Osmannisme og Khanaternes Kemalisme: Tyrkiets uden-rigspolitik — en diskurs udfordret af EFs integration og Sovjetunionens opløsning’, MA thesis, Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  43. Kazan, I., and O. Wæver (1994) ‘Tyrkiet mellem Europa og europæisering’, Internasjonal Politikk, vol. 52 (2), pp. 139–75.Google Scholar
  44. Kissinger, Henry A. (1957) ? World Restored: Castlereagh, Metternich and the Restoration of Peace, 1812–1822 (Boston, Houghton Mifflin Company).Google Scholar
  45. Koselleck, R. (1985 [1979]) Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time (Massachussets, MIT Press).Google Scholar
  46. Kvistad, G. O. (1989) ‘Radicals and the State: the Political Demands on West German Civil Servants’, in James A. Caporaso (ed.), The Elusive State: International and Comparative Perspectives (Newbury Park, Sage).Google Scholar
  47. Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Times (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  48. Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  49. Larsen, H. (1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain, and Europe (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  50. Larsen, H. (1999) ‘British and Danish European Policies in the 1990s: a Discourse Approach’, European Journal of International Relations, vol. 5 (4), pp. 451–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marcussen, Martin, Thomas Risse, Daniela Engelmann-Martin, Hans Joachim Knopf, and Klaus Roscher (1999) ‘Constructing Europe? The Evolution of French, British, and German Nation-State Identities’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 6 (3), pp. 614–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marx, K. (1956 [1867]) Das Kapital: Kritik der politischen Ökonomie, vols 1-3 (Berlin, Dietz).Google Scholar
  53. Meinecke, F. (1976 [1915]) Die Idee der Staatsräson in der neueren Geschichte (München, R. Oldenburg).Google Scholar
  54. Neumann, I. B. (1996) Russia and the Idea of Europe: a Study in Identity and International Relations (London, Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Neumann, I. B. (2000) Makt, Mening, Materialitet (Bergen, Fagbok for läget).Google Scholar
  56. Neumann, I. B. (2002) ‘From the USSR to Gorbachev to Putin: Perestroika as a Failed Excursion from “the West” to “Europe” in Russian Discourse’, in Mikaelaf Malmborg and Bo Stråth (eds), The Meaning of Europe (Oxford and New York, Berg), pp. 191–214.Google Scholar
  57. Nipperdey, T. (1986) Nachdenken über die Deutsche Geschichte: Essays (München, Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung).Google Scholar
  58. Onuf, N. G. (1989) World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations (Columbia, University of South Carolina Press).Google Scholar
  59. Pedersen, O. K. (1970) Udenrigsminister P. Munch’s opfattelse of Danmarks stilling i international politik (Copenhagen, Gad).Google Scholar
  60. Peters, D. (2001) ‘The Debate about a New German Foreign Policy after Unification’, in V. Rittberger (ed.), German Foreign Policy since Unification: Theories and Case Studies (Manchester, Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  61. Popper, K. (1963) Conjectures and Refutations (London, Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  62. Ricoeur, P. (1995) ‘Reflections on a New Ethos for Europe’, Philosophy & Social Criticism, 21(5-6), pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
  63. Ringmar, E. (1997) ‘Alexander Wendt: a Social Scientist Struggling with History’, in I. B. Neumann and O. Wæver, The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  64. Ruggie, J. G. (1983) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neo-Realist Synthesis’, World Politics, 36(2), pp. 261–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ruggie, J. G. (1997) ‘The Past as Prologue? Interests, Identity, and American Foreign Policy’, International Security, vol. 21(4), pp. 89–125.Google Scholar
  66. Schröder, G. (2002) ‘Meine Vision von Deutschland’, BILD-Zeitung, 8 August 2002, available at
  67. Schwilk, H., and U. Schacht (eds) (1994) Die selbstbewußte Nation: ‘Anschwellender Bocksgesang’ und weitere Beiträge zu einer deutschen Debatte (Berlin, Frankfurt am Main).Google Scholar
  68. Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics 1: On Method (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sørensen, J. M. (1998) ‘The Coming Hegemony? A Constructivist Interpretation of the Future Direction of the US’ Security Role in Europe’, MA thesis, Copenhagen: Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  70. Stauersböll, H. (2000) ‘Between Byzantium and Hellas: Understanding the Greek Policy towards Macedonia in the 1990s’, MA thesis, Copenhagen: Institute of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  71. Staun, J. (2001) Mellem kantiansk patriotisme og politisk romantik: det tyske statsog nationsbegreb i to århundreder, PhD thesis, Department of Political Science, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  72. Stürmer, M. (1989) ‘Die Deutschen in Europa: Auf dem Weg zu einer zwischenstaatlichen Innenpolitik’, Europa Archiv 25 (12), pp. 721–32.Google Scholar
  73. Waever, O. (1990) ‘Three Competing Europes: German, French, Russian’, International Affairs, 44 (2), pp. 477–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Waever, O. (1991) ‘Det tyske problem i 1990erne’ (The German Problem in the 1990s), Internasjonal Politikk (Oslo), 1991 (4), pp. 401–19.Google Scholar
  75. Wæver, O. (1994) ‘Resisting the Temptation of Post Foreign Policy Analysis’, in W. Carlsnaes and S. Smith (eds), European Foreign Policy: the EC and Changing Perspectives in Europe (London, ECPR/Sage).Google Scholar
  76. Wæver, O. (1995) ‘Hvordan det hele alligevel kan gå galt...’, in H. Gottlieb and F. P. Jensen (eds), Tyskland i Europa (Copenhagen, SNU).Google Scholar
  77. Wæver, O. (1996) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Inter-paradigm Debate’, in S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds), International Theory: Positivism & Beyond (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  78. Wæver, O. (1997) Concepts of Security (Copenhagen, Politiske Studier).Google Scholar
  79. Wæver, O. (1998a) ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization 52 (4), pp. 687–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wæver, O. (1998b) ‘Insecurity, Security and Asecurity in the Western European Non-War Community’, in E. Adler and M. Barnett (eds), Security Communities (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  81. Wæver, O. (2003) ‘Discursive Approaches’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds), European Integration Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  82. Wæver, O., U. Holm and H. Larsen (Forthcoming) The Struggle for Europe’: French and German Concepts of State, Nation and European Union.Google Scholar
  83. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics (New York, Random House).Google Scholar
  84. Žižek, S. (1992) ‘Eastern Europe’s Republics of Gilead’, in C. Mouffe (ed.), Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community (London, Verso).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ole Wcever
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations