Advertisement

New Labour’s Politics of the Hard-working Family

  • Oscar Reyes

Abstract

This chapter uses the case of New Labour’s family politics to investigate the general claim that the party rejects a social democratic politics ‘grounded in collective agency, attachments, and interests’ (Krieger, 1999, p. 19).1 It argues that New Labour has not abandoned the attempt to construct political subjects, as its politics both presupposes the existence of bonds of community and seeks to strengthen them. This is, in fact, the core of Blair’s ‘social-ism’: an ethical judgement that individuals are socially interdependent human beings who owe a duty to one another and to a broader society (Blair, 1994, p. 4). But does the displacement from class to the notoriously slippery concept of community leave the meaning of this collectivity radically unspecified, and therefore incapable of constituting lasting attachments (Krieger, 1999, p. 160)? I argue that it does not, because the particular case of the ‘hard-working family’ is promulgated as typical of the universal notion of community, providing it with a concrete representation. My main thesis, then, is that the ‘hardworking family’ has emerged as the principle subject posited by New Labour politics. This marks the abandonment of the working man (and his dependants) as Labourism’s historical subject. As Mandelson and Liddle put it, ‘Whereas the old left saw its job as to represent trade unions, pressure groups and the “working class” … New Labour stands for the ordinary families who work hard and play by the rules’ (1996, p. 18).

Keywords

Unpaid Work Labour Party Discourse Theory Social Democratic Party Daily Mail 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Anderson, P., and Mann, N. (1997) The Making of New Labour (London, Granta).Google Scholar
  2. Beck-Gernsheim, E. (2002 [1998]) Reinventing the Family (Cambridge, Polity).Google Scholar
  3. Billig, M. (1998) Talking of the Royal Family (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  4. Blair, T. (1994) Socialism (London, Fabian Society).Google Scholar
  5. Blair, T. (1996) New Britain: My Vision of a Young Country (London, Fourth Estate).Google Scholar
  6. Blair, T. (1998) The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century (London, Fabian Society).Google Scholar
  7. Blair, T. (1999) Speech to Labour Party Conference, 28 September.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, T. (2000) Speech to the Women’s Institutes’ Triennial General Meeting, 7 June.Google Scholar
  9. Blair, T. (2001) ‘The Power of Community Can Change the World’, Speech to the Labour Party Conference, 3 October.Google Scholar
  10. Blair, T. (2002a) ‘New Labour and Community’, Renewal, 10.2: 9–14.Google Scholar
  11. Blair, T. (2002b) Tony Blair talks to Newsnight, 14 May http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/1985222.stm.
  12. Blair, T., and Schröder, G. (1999) Europe: the Third Way/die Neue Mitte (London, The Labour Party and SPD).Google Scholar
  13. Brewer, M., Clark, T., and Wakefield, M. (2001) Social Security under New Labour: What Did the Third Way Mean for Welfare Reform? (London, Institute for Fiscal Studies).Google Scholar
  14. Brown, G. (1994) ‘The Politics of Potential’, in D. Miliband (ed.), Reinventing the Left (London, Polity).Google Scholar
  15. Clark, T., Myck, M., and Smith, Z. (2001) Fiscal Reform affecting Households, 1997–2001 (London, Institute for Fiscal Studies).Google Scholar
  16. Commission on Social Justice (1994) Social Justice: Strategies for National Renewal (London, Random House).Google Scholar
  17. Crouch, C. (1999), ‘The Parabola of Working Class Politics’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright, The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
  18. Dallmayr, F. (1988) ‘Hegemony and Democracy: On Laclau and Mouffe’, Strategies, 1: 29–49.Google Scholar
  19. Deacon, A., and Mann, K. (1997) ‘Moralism and Modernity: the Paradox of New Labour Thinking on Welfare’, Benefits, 20: 2–6.Google Scholar
  20. Deacon, A., and Mann, K. (1999) ‘Agency, modernity and social policy, Journal of Social Policy, 28: 3: 413–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Department of Social Security (1998) New Ambitions for Our Country: a New Contract for Welfare, Cm. 3805 (London, The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
  22. Driver, S., and Martell, L. (1997) ‘New Labour’s Communitarians’, Critical Social Policy, 17.3: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Driver, S., and Martell, L. (1998) New Labour: Politics after Thatcherism (Cambridge, Polity Press).Google Scholar
  24. Driver, S., and Martell, L. (2002) ‘New Labour, Work and the Family’, Social Policy & Administration, 36.1: 46–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Durham, M. (2001) ‘The Conservative Party, New Labour and the Politics of the Family’, Parliamentary Affairs, 54: 459–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Elliott, G. (1993) Labourism and the English Genius (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  27. Esping-Andersen, G. (1999) Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (Oxford, Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Etzioni, A. (1995) The Spirit of Community: Rights, Responsibilities and the Communitarian Agenda (London, Fontana).Google Scholar
  29. Fairclough, N. (2000) New Labour, New Language? (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  30. Finlayson, A. (1999) ‘Third Way Theory’, Political Quarterly: 271–9.Google Scholar
  31. Finlayson, A. (2003) Making Sense of New Labour (London, Lawrence and Wishart).Google Scholar
  32. Foucault, M. (1984), ‘What Is an Author?’, in P. Rabinow (ed.), The Foucault Reader (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
  33. Fox-Harding, L. (2000) Supporting Families/Controlling Families? Towards a Characterisation of New Labour’s Family Policy, Working Paper no. 21 (Centre for Research on Family, Kinship and Childhood, University of Leeds).Google Scholar
  34. Francis, M. (2000), ‘Labour and Gender’, in D. Tanner, P. Thane, and N. Tiratsoo, Labour’s First Century (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Franklin, B. (1998) Tough on Soundbites, Tough on the Causes of Soundbites: New Labour and News Management, Cataylst Paper 3 (London, Catalyst Trust).Google Scholar
  36. Franks, S. (1999) Having None of It: Women, Men and the Future of Work (London, Granta).Google Scholar
  37. Frazer, E. (1999), ‘Unpicking Political Communitarianism: a Critique of “the Communitarian Family”’, in G. Jagger and C., Wright (eds), Changing Family Values (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  38. Freeden, M. (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Freeden, M. (1999a) ‘The Ideology of New Labour’, Political Quarterly, 70.1: 42–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Freeden, M. (1999b), ‘True Blood or False Genealogy: New Labour and British Social Democratic Thought’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright (eds), The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
  41. Giddens, A. (1999) Runaway World (London, Profile Books).Google Scholar
  42. Glennester, H. (2000) British Social Policy since 1945, 2nd edn (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
  43. Gould, P. (1999) The Unfinished Revolution (London, Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  44. Gould, P., and Hewitt, P. (1993) ‘Lessons from America’, Renewal January.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, S. (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  46. Harris, J. (1996), ‘“Contract” and “Citizenship”’, in D. Marquand and A. Seldon (eds), The Ideas That Shaped Post-war Britain (London, Fontana).Google Scholar
  47. Hay C., and Watson, M. (2003) ‘The Discourse of Globalisation and the Logic of No Alternative: Rendering the Contingent Necessary in the Political Economy of New Labour’, Policy and Politics, 31: 3: 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. HM Treasury (2002) The Child and Working Tax Credits: the Modernisation of Britain’s Tax and Benefit System (London, HM Treasury).Google Scholar
  49. Home Office (1998a) New Ambitions for Our Country: a New Contract for Welfare (London, The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
  50. Home Office (1998b) Supporting Families: a Consultation Document (London, The Stationery Office).Google Scholar
  51. Hughes, G., and Little, A. (1999) ‘The Contradictions of New Labour’s Communitarian-ism’, Imprints, 4: 1: 37–62.Google Scholar
  52. Jessop, B. (1994), ‘The Transition to Post-Fordism and the Schumperterian Workfare State’, in R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds), Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  53. Keeble, S. (1999), ‘Middle England’, in M. Linton, K. Raymond, and A. Whitehead (eds), Beyond 2002: Long-term Policies for Labour (London, Profile Books).Google Scholar
  54. Krieger, J. (1999) British Politics in the Global Age: Can Social Democracy Survive? (Cambridge, Polity).Google Scholar
  55. Laclau, E. (1977) Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  56. Laclau, E. (1990) New Reflections on the Revolution of Our Time (London, Verso)Google Scholar
  57. Laclau, E. (1996) Emancipation(s) (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  58. Laclau, E., and Mouffe, C. (1985) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  59. Leadbeater, C. (2000) Living on Thin Air: the New Economy (Harmondsworth, Penguin).Google Scholar
  60. Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour (Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Lewis, G. (2000), ‘Discursive Histories, the Pursuit of Multiculturalism and Social Policy’, in G. Lewis, S. Gewirtz, and J. Clarke (eds), Rethinking Social Policy (London, Sage).Google Scholar
  62. Lewis, J. (1993), ‘Introduction: Women, Work, Family and Social Policies in Europe’, in J. Lewis (ed.), Women and Social Policies in Europe (London, Edward Elgar).Google Scholar
  63. Lewis, J. (1997) ‘Gender and Welfare Regimes: Further Thoughts’, Social Politics, 4: 2 (Summer): 160–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lewis, J. (1998). ‘Work, Welfare and Lone Mothers’, Political Quarterly, 69: 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lewis, J. (2002), ‘Individualisation, Assumptions about the Existence of an Adult Worker Model and the Shift towards Contractualism’, in A. Carling, S. Duncan, and E. Edwards (eds), Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice (London, Routledge).Google Scholar
  66. Lister, R. (2001) ‘Doing Good by Stealth: the Politics of Poverty and Inequality under New Labour’, New Economy, 65–70Google Scholar
  67. Macintyre, D. (2000) Mandelson (London, Harper Collins).Google Scholar
  68. Mandelson, P., and Liddle, R. (1996) The Blair Revolution: Can New Labour Deliver? (London, Faber & Faber).Google Scholar
  69. Manifesto for New Times (1989) ‘The New Times’, in S. Hall and M. Jacques (eds), New Times: the Changing Face of Politics in the 1990s (London, Lawrence and Wishart).Google Scholar
  70. Mouffe, C. (1993) Return of the Political (London, Verso).Google Scholar
  71. Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance: New Labour, Policy and Society (London, Sage).Google Scholar
  72. Panitch, L. (1972) ‘Ideology and Integration: the Case of the British Labour Party’, Political Studies, 19: 2: 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Pedersen, S. (1993) Family, Dependence and the Origins of the Welfare State (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  74. Pelling, H. (1965) The Origins of the Labour Party 1880–1900 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  75. Rentoul, J. (2001) Tony Blair (London, Warner Books).Google Scholar
  76. Ritzer, G. (1993) The McDonaldisation of Society (Thousand Oaks, CA, Pine Forge Press).Google Scholar
  77. Sassoon, D. (1996) One Hundred Years of Socialism (London, Fontana).Google Scholar
  78. Shaw, E. (1996) The Labour Party since 1945 (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
  79. Stedman Jones, G. (1983) Languages of Class (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  80. Vanderbrouke, F. (1999), ‘European Social Democracy’, in A. Gamble and T. Wright (eds), The New Social Democracy (Oxford, Blackwell).Google Scholar
  81. Wilkinson, H. (ed.) (2000) Family Business (London, Demos).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oscar Reyes
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EssexUK

Personalised recommendations