Abstract
The Hungarian ‘long fifteenth century’ — in this case, from the defeat of the crusaders at Nicopolis in 1396 to the crusade-turned-rebellion of 1514 — was characterized more by the political use of crusading ideas than by actual military actions against ‘enemies of Christendom’, supported by papal indulgences. Late medieval crusade in this part of the world meant almost exclusively the fight against the advancing ‘infidels’, the Ottoman Empire. The rhetoric of crusading in this age began with the reforms introduced in the wake of the failure at Nicopolis, became significant during the interregna between 1439 and 1458, and constituted the central element in the diplomacy of King Matthias I Corvinus (1458–90). Actual crusading campaigns were rather few: one leading to the defeat at Varna (1444), the other relieving Belgrade in 1456. Both have been extensively studied and described, as have the events of 1514, in which the ‘peasant’ crucigeri (in Magyar: kurucok) turned against the ‘enemies inside’, that is, the lords and prelates, who, in their eyes, were not just failing to defend them against the infidel, but were actually worse than the latter.1
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On this aspect, see my ‘Delinquent Lords and Forsaken Serfs: Thoughts on War and Society during the Crisis of Feudalism’, in Society in Change: Studies in Honor of Bêla K. Király, ed. S. B. Vardy and A. H. Vardy (New York, 1983), pp. 291–304. It may be interesting to note that the word kuruc became the name for all later rebels against the Habsburg rulers of Hungary, down to the recent past, when it was applied to intransigent ‘national’ politicians.
The exact date has not been established. See J. M. Bak, P. Engel and J. R. Sweeney, eds, Decreta Regni Mediaevalis Hungariae: The Laws of the Medieval Kingdom of Hungary (henceforth: DRMH), vol. 2 (1301–1457) (Salt Lake City, 1992), pp. 21–8. See also J. Held, ‘Military reform in early fifteenth-century Hungary’, East European Quarterly 11 (1977), 129–39.
See A. Borosy, ‘The militia portalis in Hungary before 1526’, in J. M. Bak and B. K. Király, eds, From Hunyadi to Rákóczi: War and Society in Late Medieval and Early Modern Hungary (New York, 1982), pp. 63–80.
See Gy. Bónis, ‘Ständisches Finanzwesen in Ungarn im frühen 16. Jahrhundert’, Nouvelles Études Historiques (Budapest, 1965), 83–103.
On these see F. Szakály, ‘Phases of Turco-Hungarian Warfare before the Battle of Mohäcs (1365–1526)’, Acta Orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 33 (1979), 66–111.
A. Kovách, ‘Der “Mongolenbrief” Bêlas IV. und Papst Innozenz IV.’, in Überlieferung und Auftrag: Festschrift für Michael de Ferdinandy zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. J. G. Farkas (Wiesbaden, 1972), pp. 495–506.
A. Theiner, ed., Vetera Monumenta historica Hungariam sacram illustrantia, 2 (Rome, 1860), p. 289.
Aeneas Silvius Piccolomini, Opera quae extant, 1 (Basle 1551), p. 556.
L. Terbe, ‘Egy európai szállóige életrajza: Magyarország a kereszténység védöbástyája’ [Biography of a European proverb: Hungary as the bastion of Christendom], Egyetemes Philologiai Közlöny/Archivum Philologicum 60 (1936), 297–351, here 302.
See J. V. Fine, The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century to the Ottoman Conquest (Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1987), pp. 143–9.
E. Mályusz, Kaiser Sigismund in Ungarn 1387–1437, trans. A. Szmodits (Budapest, 1990), p. 123.
On Hunyadi in general, see J. Held, Hunyadi: Legend and Reality (New York, 1985).
G. Fejér, Genus, incunabula et virtus Joannis Corvini de Hunyad (Buda, 1844), p. 153.
Joannes Dtugosz, Opera omnia, 13, ed. A. Przedziecki (Cracow, 1877) p. 701, quoted by Engel, ‘Hunyadi’.
From the extensive literature (mostly in Hungarian) let me refer only to Jenö Szücs, Nation und Geschichte: Studien (Budapest, 1981), esp. pp. 101–29.
See K. Nehring, Matthias Corvinus, Kaiser Friedrich III. und das Reich, 2nd revd edn (Munich 1989).
The most recent attempt at drawing a balance of the Corvinian’s reign is J. K. Hoensch, König Matthias Corvinus: Diplomat, Feldherr und Mäzen (Graz, etc., 1998), esp. pp. 261–3. He does not accept the argument for necessary expansion, suggesting that a better management of the country’s resources, combined with the occasional help of the papal curia and other Christian powers, would have sufficed to halt Ottoman advance into the Danubian principalities and towards the Adriatic. But in general he does not place much emphasis on the ‘west or south’ alternatives.
See J. M. Bak, ‘Monarchie im Wellental: materielle Grundlagen des ungarischen Königtums im fünfzehnten Jahrhundert’, in Das spätmittelalterliche Königtum in europäischem Vergleich, ed. R. Schneider (Sigmaringen, 1987), pp. 347–84, at pp. 356–8.
See Bak, ‘Delinquent Lords and Forsaken Serfs’ N. Housley, ‘Crusading as Social Revolt: The Hungarian Peasant Uprising of 1514’, Journal of Ecclesiastical History 49 (1998), 1–28.
Giovanni Antonio Burgio to the papal secretary Jacopo Sadoleto, 13 April 1525; A. Ipolyi, ed., Relationes oratorum pontificiorum 1524–1526, Monumenta Vaticana historiam regni Hungariae illustrantia, ser. 2, vol. 1 (repr. Budapest 2001), p. 163, my translation.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2004 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bak, J.M. (2004). Hungary and Crusading in the Fifteenth Century. In: Housley, N. (eds) Crusading in the Fifteenth Century. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523357_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523357_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-50831-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52335-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)