Skip to main content

EU Institutional Reform and New Member States in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice

  • Chapter
The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Enlarged Europe

Part of the book series: One Europe or Several? ((OES))

Abstract

While much of the accession process placed strict demands upon EU candidate states for compliance with the abundant provisions of the acquis, the context of the Convention on the Future of Europe and later the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) offered a different setting calling for input of ideas by prospective member states. From February 2002 to July 2003 representatives from the CEECs ‘took a crash course in European integration through their participation in the Convention on the Future of Europe’.1 In contrast to the asymmetric nature of accession talks, the Convention offered future member states the first opportunity to take a full part in EU’s internal deliberations.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. H. Grabbe, The Constellations of Europe. How enlargement will transform the EU (London: CER, 2004), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  2. For a succinct summary of the main issues see F. Hagedorn, ‘Reforming Justice and Home Affairs. A Question of Balance: The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice’, Convention Spotlight 2002/09 (Munich: Center for Applied Policy Research, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For the analysis of the external dimension of enlarging Schengen, see J. Batt, ‘The Enlarged EU’s external borders — the regional dimension’, in Partners and neighbours: a CFSP for a wider Europe, Chaillot Paper no. 64 (Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies, September 2003), pp. 102–18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For positions of various members-to-be on unanimity in select policy areas including JHA see C. Franck and D. Pyszna-Nigge (eds), Position of 10 Central and Eastern European Countries on EU Institutional Reforms: Analytical Survey in the framework of the CEEC-DEBATE project (Louvain-la-Neuve/Brussels: Université catholique de Louvain, June 2003).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bilčík, V. (2005). EU Institutional Reform and New Member States in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. In: Henderson, K. (eds) The Area of Freedom, Security and Justice in the Enlarged Europe. One Europe or Several?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523340_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics