Extending the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice: the Crucial Case of Poland

  • Iwona Piórko
  • Monika Sie Dhian Ho
Part of the One Europe or Several? book series (OES)


For Poland, the largest new member of the European Union, 2004 was the beginning of a crucial period for its future development. Accession preparations had been intensive, but significant progress still had to be made on implementing and enforcing the EU acquis in full. This chapter sets forth why the EU acquis in the field of justice and home affairs (JHA) — including the Schengen acquis as integrated into the EU framework — needs special attention in the early post-enlargement phase, and why Poland is an exceptionally important case in this respect. The chapter’s objective is to assess the costs and benefits of EU membership for Poland in the field of JHA, and to discuss the remaining challenges, as well as measures that could facilitate Poland’s further integration into the EU’s JHA/Schengen cooperation.


Official Journal Border Control Home Affair External Border Judicial Cooperation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    This chapter is based on I. Piórko’s Ph.D. thesis, forthcoming at the Sussex European Institute, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK, and research conducted by I. Piórko and M. Sie Dhian Ho in the context of the Natolin European Centre project, Costs and Benefits of Poland’s Membership in the European Union (Warsaw: Natolin European Centre, 2003).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    H. Tang, ‘Overview’, in H. Tang (ed.), Winners and Losers of EU Integration. Policy Issues for Central and Eastern Europe (Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, 2000), pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 7.
    P. Stachańczyk, Cudzoziemcy (Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Zrzeszenia Prawników Polskich, 1998), p. 9.Google Scholar
  4. 8.
    S. Lodziński, Problemy polityki migracyjnej Polski w latach 1989–1998 (czerwiec) a nowa ustawa o cudzoziemcach (Warsaw: Biuro Studiów i Ekspertyz Kancelarii Sejmu, 1998), p. 1.Google Scholar
  5. 15.
    M. Adamczyk, ‘Border Guard of the Republic of Poland. Modern European Border Force’ (Warsaw: International Cooperation and European Integration Bureau of the Border Guard Headquarters, unpublished paper, 2002), pp. 30–31.Google Scholar
  6. 24.
    K. Iglicka, ‘Migration Movements from and into Poland in the Light of East-West European Migration’, International Migration, 39/1 (2001), 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 27.
    Ministry of Interior and Administration, Strategia zintegrowanego zarządzania granicą w latach 2003–2005 (Warsaw: Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji, 2002), p. 108.Google Scholar
  8. 31.
    W.M. Orlowski, ‘Konsekwencje ekonomiczne Schengen’, in Institute of Public Affairs (ed.), Polska droga do Schengen — Opinie ekspertów (Warsaw: Instytut Spraw Publicznych, 2001), p. 97.Google Scholar
  9. 36.
    Council of Ministers, Raport w sprawie korzyści i kosztów integracji Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z Unią Europejską (Warsaw: Rada Ministrów, 2000), p. 110.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Iwona Piórko
  • Monika Sie Dhian Ho

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations