Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Development Economics and Policy ((SDEP))

Abstract

In recent years there have been increased pressures to help the poorest nations through aid, debt relief and trade initiatives. At the first Ministerial Meeting of the WTO in Singapore in 1996, the then Director-General of the WTO, Renato Ruggiero, declared his intention to press WTO members to afford tariff and quota-free entry to imports from the least developed countries (LDCs) to the markets of the developed countries. This initiative bore fruit in 2000, when the EU Trade Commissioner, Pascal Lamy, announced the intention to grant duty-free and quota-free access for all goods (with the exception of arms) originating in LDCs — its ‘Everything But Arms’ (EBA) initiative, under which it proposed to reduce to zero all tariffs on imports from LDCs except arms and to free such imports from any quantitative restriction. Other developed countries have made similar proposals, including the US African Growth and Opportunities Act (AGOA), but in terms of the value of trade the EU proposal is the most important. This chapter evaluates the EU proposal, using ex ante trade simulation techniques, and draws some tentative conclusions.

The views expressed in the chapter are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent the views of the organizations for which they work nor the member states of those organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agra Europe (2001) ‘EBA Treaty will Force Further CAP Reforms’, Agra Europe, 9, 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cemat, L., S. Laird, L. Monge-Roffarello and A. Turrini (2003) ‘The EU’s Everything But Arms Initiative and the Least-developed Countries’, WIDER Discussion Paper DP2003/47, Helsinki: UNU-WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (EC) (2000a) ‘EU Trade Concessions to Least Developed Countries — Everything But Arms Proposal: First Remarks on the Possible Impacts on the Agricultural Sector’, Report by the European Commission Directorate for Agriculture, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/commissioners/fishler/eba_en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2000b) ‘EU Trade Concessions to Least Developed Countries — Everything But Arms Proposal: Possible Impacts on the Agricultural Sector’, Report by the European Commission Directorate for Trade, available at http://europa.eu.int/comm/trade/pdf/eba_ias.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertel, T. (1997) Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ianchovichina, E., A. Mattoo and M. Olarreaga (2001) ‘Unrestricted Market Access for Sub-Saharan Africa: How Much is it Worth and Who Pays?’, CEPR Discussion Paper 2820.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, S. and A. Yeats (1990) Quantitative Methods for Trade Barrier Analysis, New York, Macmillan and NYUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2002) ‘The Great EU Sugar Scam’, Oxfam Briefing Paper 27, London, 25 August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam and IDS (2001) The Impact of the EU’s ‘Everything but Arms’ Proposal: A Report to Oxfam, London, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, S. and A. Hewitt (2002) ‘The New European Trade Preferences: Does the “Everything But Arms” (EBA) Help the Poor?’, Development Policy Review, 20(1): 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panagariya, A. (1998) ‘Rethinking the New Regionalism’, in J. Nash and W. Takacs, (eds), Trade Policy Reform. Lessons and Implications, Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trueblood, M. and A. Somwaru (2002) ‘Trade Liberalization and the Least Developed Countries: Modeling the EU’s Everything but Arms Initiative’, Paper presented at the 2002 Conference on Global Economic Analysis, Taipei.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2001) Duty and Quota Free Market Access for LDCs: An Analysis of Quad Initiatives, London and Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and the Commonwealth Secretariat.

    Google Scholar 

  • — (2002) Handbook on the Scheme of the European Community, UNCTAD/ITCD/TSB/Misc.25/Rev.2, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viner, J. (1950) The Custom Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 United Nations University

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cernat, L., Laird, S., Monge-Roffarello, L., Turrini, A. (2004). The EU Everything But Arms Initiative and the LDCs. In: Guha-Khasnobis, B. (eds) The WTO, Developing Countries and the Doha Development Agenda. Studies in Development Economics and Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523265_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics