Exporting and Productivity Growth: Theory

  • Rod Falvey
  • Zhihong Yu


Traditional treatments of the gains from trade were primarily concerned with the static gains realisable from realigning production in accordance with comparative advantage. In an open economy, resources would be (re)allocated more ‘productively’, taking advantage of the opportunities to import those products in whose production the country is relatively less efficient by exporting those in whose production it is relatively more efficient. These gains are available even if autarky production is technically efficient (i.e. on the production possibility frontier), and in a world where technologies exhibit constant returns to scale, firms are largely irrelevant and the effects of trade on the efficiency of resource use within the industry cannot be explored.


Productivity Growth Foreign Firm Trade Cost Export Market Productive Firm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alvarez, R. and R. Robertson (2004), ‘Exposure to Foreign Markets and Firm-Level Innovation: Evidence from Chile and Mexico’, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 13, 57–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balassa, B. (1967), Trade Liberalization Among Industrialized Countries: Objectives and Alternatives, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R. and P. Krugman (1989), ‘Persistent Effects of Large Exchange Rate Shocks’, Quarterly Journal of Econornics, 104, 635–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balock, G. and P. Gertler (2004), ‘Learning from Exporting Revisited in a Less Developed Setting’, Journal of Development Economics, 75, 397–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernard, A., J. Eaton, B. Jensen, and S. Kortum (2003), ‘Plants and Productivity in International Trade’, American Economic Review, 93(4), September, 1268–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernard, A. and B. Jensen (2004), ‘Exporting and Productivity’, Mimeo, Hanover: Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  7. Bernard, A. and B. Jensen (1999), ‘Economics, Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both?’, Journal of International Economics, 47, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, A., S. Redding and P. Schott (2004), ‘Comparative Advantage and Heterogeneous Firms’, Mimeo, Hanover: Tuck School of Business, Dartmouth College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chisik, R. (2003) ‘Export Industry Policy and Reputational Comparative Advantage’, Journal of International Economics, 59(2), 423–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clerides, M., S. Lach and J. Tybout (1998), ‘Is Learning by Exporting Important? Micro-Dynamic Evidence From Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 903–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Falvey, R., D. Greenaway and Z. Yu (2004), ‘Intra-industry Trade Between Asymmetric Countries with Heterogeneous Firms’, Working Paper 04/2004, Leverhulme Centre for Research on Globalisation and Economic Policy, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  12. Holmes, T. and J. Schmitz (2001), ‘A Gain From Trade: From Unproductive to Productive Entrepreneurship’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 47(2), 417–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hopenhayn, H. (1992), ‘Entry, Exit and Firm Dynamics in Long Run Equilibrium’, Econometrica, 60, 1127–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horn, H. H. Lang and S. Lundgren (1995), ‘Managerial Effort Incentives, X-inefficiency and International Trade’, European Economic Review, 39, 117–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jean, S. (2002), ‘International Trade and Firms’ Heterogeneity under Monopolistic Competition’, Open Economies Review, 13, 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Krugman, P. (1980), ‘Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and the Pattern of Trade’, American Economic Review, 70, 950–959Google Scholar
  17. Leibenstein, H. (1966), ‘Allocative Efficiency vs. “X-efficiency”’, American Economic Review, 56, 392–415.Google Scholar
  18. Montagna, C. (2001), ‘Efficiency Gaps, Love of Variety and International Trade’, Economica, 68, 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melitz, M. (2003), ‘The impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocations and Aggregate Industry Productivity’, Econometrica, 71, 1695–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melitz, M. and G. Ottaviano (2003), ‘Market Size, Trade and Productivity,’ Harvard University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
  21. Ottaviano, G.I.P., T. Tabuchi and J.-F. Thisse (2002), ‘Agglomeration and Trade Revisited’, International Economic Review, 43, 409–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavnik, N. (2002), ‘Trade liberalization, Exit and Productivity Improvement: Evidence from Chilean Plants’, The Review of Economic Studies, 69, 245–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rhee, Ross-Larson and Pursell (1984) Korea’s Competitive Edge: Managing the Entry into the World Markets, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Roberts, K. and J. Tybout (1997), ‘The Decision to Export in Colombia: An Empirical Model of Entry with Sunk Costs’, American Economic Review, 87, 545–564.Google Scholar
  25. Tybout J. and D. Westbrook (1995), ‘Trade Liberalisation and the Dimensions of Efficiency Change in Mexican Manufacturing Industries’, Journal of International Economics, 39, 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Rod Falvey and Zhihong Yu 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rod Falvey
  • Zhihong Yu

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations