Multinational Enterprises and Spillovers

  • Holger Görg
  • Alexander Hijzen

Abstract

It has been estimated that the British government provided grants worth £50.75 million to Motorola to locate a production facility in Scotland in 1991, providing around 3000 jobs. Also, Siemens received around £50 million in order to attract it to build a plant employing 1000 workers in the North East of England in 1996.1 It seems reasonable to ask how such active policy can be justified. Apart from regional concerns in particular about direct job creation, the argument frequently centres around the possibility that foreign multinationals bring with them new technologies which may spill over to the local economy, benefiting not only the region but the economy as a whole. This argument has become particularly important given policy makers’ concerns that the United Kingdom is lagging behind its European and North American partners in terms of technology and productivity (e.g. DTI, 2001). Hence, an influx of foreign direct investment (FDI) associated with an inflow of new knowledge and technologies is seen as particularly advantageous.

Keywords

Migration Europe Indonesia Estima Venezuela 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, B.J. and A.E. Harrison (1999), ‘Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Investment? Evidence from Venezuela’, American Economic Review, 89, 605–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, Matthew and Ralf Martin (2002), ‘Business Data Linking: An Introduction’, Economic Trends, 581, 34–41.Google Scholar
  3. Barrios, Salvador, Holger Görg and Eric Strobl (2005), ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Competition and Industrial Development in the Host Country’, European Economic Review, 49, 2005, 1761–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blomström, Magnus (1986), ‘Foreign Investment and Productive Efficiency: The Case of Mexico’, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 97–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caves, Richard E. (1974), ‘Multinational Firms, Competition, and Productivity in Host-Country Markets’, Economica, 41, 176–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caves, Richard E. (1996), Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis. Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Driffield, Nigel (2001), ‘The Impact on Domestic Productivity of Inward Investment in the UK’, The Manchester School, 69, 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Driffield, Nigel, Max Munday and Annette Roberts (2002), ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Transactions Linkages, and the Performance of the Domestic Sector’, International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9, 335–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DTI (2001), UK competitiveness indicators, second edition. Department of Trade and Industry, London.Google Scholar
  10. Girma, Sourafel (2002), ‘Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: A Threshold Regression Analysis’, GEP Research Paper 02/08, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  11. Girma, Sourafel and Holger Görg (2002): ‘Foreign Direct Investment, Spillovers and Absorptive Capacity: Evidence from Quantile Regressions’, GEP Research Paper 02/14, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  12. Girma, Sourafel, Holger Görg and Mauro Pisu (2004), ‘The Role of Exports and Foreign Linkages for FDI Productivity Spillovers’, mimeo, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  13. Girma, Sourafel, David Greenaway and Katharine Wakelin (2001), ‘Who Benefits from Foreign Direct Investment in the UK?’, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 48, 119–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Girma, Sourafel and Katharine Wakelin (2001), ‘Regional Underdevelopment: Is FDI the Solution? A Semiparametric Analysis’, GEP Research Paper 01/11, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  15. Girma, Sourafel and Katharine Wakelin (2002), ‘Are There Regional Spillovers from FDI in the UK?’, in David Greenaway, Richard Upward, Katharine Wakelin eds, Trade, Investment, Migration and Labour Markets, Basingstoke, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Globerman, Steven (1979), ‘Foreign Direct Investment and “Spillover” Efficiency Benefits in Canadian Manufacturing Industries’, Canadian Journal of Economics, 12, 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Görg, Holger and David Greenaway (2004), ‘Much Ado about Nothing? Do Domestic Firms Really Benefit from Foreign Direct Investment?’, World Bank Research Observer, 19, 171–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Görg, Holger and Eric Strobl (2001), ‘Multinational Companies and Productivity Spillovers: A Meta-Analysis’, Economic Journal, 111, F723-F739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Görg, Holger and Eric Strobl (2002), ‘Multinational Companies and Indigenous Development: An Empirical Analysis’, European Economic Review, 46, 1305–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Görg, Holger and Eric Strobl (2003), ‘Multinational Companies, Technology Spillovers, and Plant Survival’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 105(4), 581–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Görg, Holger and Eric Strobl (2005), ‘Spillovers from Foreign Firms through Worker Mobility: An Empirical Investigation’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 107, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  22. Hanson, Gordon H. (2001), ‘Should Countries Promote Foreign Direct Investment’, G-24 Discussion Paper No. 9, UNCTAD, Geneva.Google Scholar
  23. Harris, Richard and Catherine Robinson (2004), ‘Productivity Impacts and Spillovers from Foreign Ownership in the United Kingdom’, National Institute Economic Review, 187, 58–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hart, Peter E. and Nicholas Oulton (1995), ‘Growth and Size of Firms’, NIESR Discussion Paper No. 77, National Institute of Economic Research, London.Google Scholar
  25. Haskel, Jonathan E., Sonia C. Pereira and Matthew J. Slaughter (2002), ‘Does Inward Foreign Direct Investment Boost the Productivity of Domestic Firms?’, NBER Working Paper 8724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keller, Wolfgang and Stephen Yeaple (2003), ‘Multinational Enterprises, International Trade, and Productivity Growth: Firm-Level Evidence from the United States’, GEP Research Paper 03/03, University of Nottingham.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Larrain, Felipe B., Luis F. Lopez-Calva and Andres Rodriguez-Clare (2000), ‘Intel: A Case Study of Foreign Direct Investment in Central America’, Center for International Development Working Paper No. 58, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  28. Liu, Xiaming, Pamela Siler, Chengqi Wang and Yingqi Wei (2000): ‘Productivity Spillovers from Foreign Direct Investment: Evidence from UK Industry Level Panel Data’, Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 407–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lipsey, Robert E. and Fredrik Sjöholm (2004), ‘Host Country Impacts of Inward FDI: Why Such Different Answers’, in M. Blomström, E. Graham and T. Moran, eds, The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Development, Washington: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Markusen, James R. (2002), Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  31. Moran, Theodore (2001), Parental Supervision: The New Paradigm for Foreign Direct Investment and Development, Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  32. Olley, S. and A. Pakes (1996), ‘The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry’, Econometria, 64, 1263–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sjöholm, Fredrik (1999), ‘Productivity Growth in Indonesia: The Role of Regional Characteristics and Direct Foreign Investment’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, 47, 559–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Smarzynska-Javorcik, Beata K. (2004), ‘Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages’, American Economic Review, 94(3).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Holger Görg and Alexander Hijzen 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Holger Görg
  • Alexander Hijzen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations