Skip to main content

Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions

  • Chapter
Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics

Abstract

The implications of uncertainty for public investment decisions remain controversial. The essence of the controversy is as follows. It is widely accepted that individuals are not indifferent to uncertainty and will not, in general, value assets with uncertain returns at their expected values. Depending upon an individual’s initial asset holdings and utility function, he will value an asset at more or less than its expected value. Therefore, in private capital markets, investors do not choose investments to maximize the present value of expected returns, but to maximize the present value of returns properly adjusted for risk. The issue is whether it is appropriate to discount public investments in the same way as private investments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • K. J. Arrow, “The Role of Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-Bearing,” Rev. Econ. Stud., Apr. 1964, 31, 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, “Discounting and Public Investment Criteria,” in A. V. Kneese and S. C. Smith, eds., Water Research. Baltimore 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, “The Economics of Moral Hazard: Further Comment,” Amer. Econ. Rev., June 1968, 58, 537–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Debreu, Theory of Value. New York 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. Eckstein, “A Survey of the Theory of Public Expenditure,” and “Reply,” Public Finances: Needs, Sources, and Utilization, Nat. Bur. Econ. Res., Princeton 1961, 493–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Hirshleifer, “Investment Decision under Uncertainty: Choice-Theoretic Approaches,” Quart. J. Econ., Nov. 1965, 79, 509–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, “Investment Decision under Uncertainty: Applications of the State-Preference Approach,” Quart. J. Econ., May 1966, 80, 252–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——, J. C. De Haven, and J. W. Milliman, Water Supply: Economics, Technology, and Policy; Chicago 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Marglin, “The Social Rate of Discount and the Optimal Rate of Investment,” Quart. J. Econ., Feb. 1963, 77, 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. V. Pauly, “The Economics of Moral Hazard: Comment,” Amer. Econ. Rev., June 1968, 58, 531–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. A. Samuelson and W. Vickrey, “Discussion,” Amer. Econ. Rev. Proc., May 1964, 59, 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, 2nd ed., New York 1964.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1974 American Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arrow, K.J., Lind, R.C. (1974). Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions. In: Gopalakrishnan, C. (eds) Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523210_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics