Abstract
Almost all decision theory presupposes that agency is invested in individuals. Each individual is represented as making decisions in the light of his or her own preferences and beliefs. A person may have preferences about consequences of her actions which affect other people; but these are still her preferences. She may have beliefs about what other people will choose; but these are still her beliefs. In making decisions, she acts alone.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bacharach, Michael (1993) ‘Variable universe games’ in Ken Binmore, Alan Kirman and P. Tani (eds), Frontiers of Game Theory (pp. 255–275) (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Bacharach, Michael (1999) ‘Interactive team reasoning: a contribution to the theory of cooperation’, Research in Economics (53), 117–147.
Binmore, Ken (1994) Playing Fair (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Bratman, Michael E. (1993) ‘Shared intention’, Ethics (104), 97–113.
Cubitt, Robin and Robert Sugden (2003) ‘Common knowledge, salience and convention: a reconstruction of David Lewis’s game theory’, Economics and Philosophy (19), 175–210.
Gauthier, David (1975) ‘Coordination’, Dialogue (14), 195–221.
Gilbert, Margaret (1989) On Social Facts (London: Routledge).
Gilbert, Margaret (1999) ‘Reconsidering the ‘actual contract’ theory of political obligation’ Ethics (109), 236–260.
Hodgson, D. H. (1967) Consequences of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hollis, Martin (1998) Trust within Reason (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Hurley, Susan L. (1989) Natural Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Janssen, Maarten (2002) ‘Rationalizing focal points’, Theory and Decision (50), 119–148.
Lewis, David (1969) Convention: A Philosophical Study (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).
Regan, Donald (1980) Utilitarianism and Cooperation (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques (1762/1988) ‘On social contract’ in Alan Ritter and Julia Conaway Bondanella (eds) Rousseau’s Political Writings (New York: Norton).
Schelling, Thomas (1960) The Strategy of Conflict (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press).
Searle, John R. (1990) ‘Collective intentions and actions’, in Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha E. Pollack (eds) Intentions in Communication (pp. 410–415) (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).
Sugden, Robert (1986) The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).
Sugden, Robert (1991) ‘Rational choice: a survey of contributions from economics and philosophy’, Economic Journal (101), 751–785.
Sugden, Robert (1993) ‘Thinking as a team: toward an explanation of nonselfish behavior’, Social Philosophy and Policy (10), 69–89.
Sugden, Robert (1995) ‘A theory of focal points’, Economic Journal (105), 1269–1302.
Sugden, Robert (2000) ‘Team preferences’, Economics and Philosophy (16), 175–204.
Sugden, Robert (2002) ‘Beyond sympathy and empathy: Adam Smith’s concept of fellow-feeling’, Economics and Philosophy (18), 63–87.
Tuomela, Raimo (1995) The Importance of Us (Stanford, California: Stanford University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Robert Sugden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sugden, R. (2005). The Logic of Team Reasoning. In: Gold, N. (eds) Teamwork. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523203_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523203_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-51693-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-52320-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)