Skip to main content

Interpreting Children’s Needs: Contested Assumptions in the Provision of Welfare

  • Chapter
The Politics of Childhood

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to examine some of the different uses of concepts of ‘children’s needs’ and their implications for professional practice with children. I begin by revisiting Martin Woodhead’s critique of ‘children’s needs’ (1990, 1997) and asking how it can help us understand the use of ‘children’s needs’ in professional practice. Following this, I look at the use of the concept of ‘children’s needs’ in the Children Act 1989 in England and Wales and then at two specific examples — (1) the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, and (2) services to ‘young carers’. This is followed by considering some research into different conceptions of needs held by professionals and families, which leads to the suggestion that the concept of ‘children’s needs’ may perhaps be reclaimed. To do so, it is necessary to look at the philosophical foundations of ‘basic human needs’, and then at how children and young people can contribute to defining their own needs. Finally, this brings us to consider the political marginalisation of children, the relationship between needs and rights discourses, and the alternatives to deficit models of needs and of childhood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aldridge, J. and Becker, S. (1993) Children Who Care: Inside the World of Young Carers, Loughborough University: Young Carers Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge, J. and Becker, S. (1996) ‘Disability rights and the denial of young carers: the danger of zero-sum arguments’, Critical Social Policy 16, 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. (1970) Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baistow, K. and Wilford, G. (2000) ‘Helping parents, protecting children: ideas from Germany’, Children and Society 14 (5), 343–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1965) Political Argument, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development: experiments by nature and design, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, I. and Williamson, H. (1994) Children Speak: Children, Trauma and Social Work, Harlow: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H., Unell, I. and Aldgate, J. (1999) Children’s Needs — Parenting Capacity, London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1988) Protecting Children: a guide to comprehensive assessment for social workers, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1991a) The Children Act 1989 Guidance and Regulations Volume 3: Family Placements, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (1991b) Patterns and Outcomes in Child Placement: messages from current research and their implications, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health, Department of Education and Employment and Home Office (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, London: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991) A Theory of Human Need, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farson, R. (1974) Birthrights, Collier Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flekkoy, M. and Kaufman, N. (1997) The Participation Rights of the Child: rights and responsibilities in family and society, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1995) Couldn’t Care More — a Study of Young Carers and their Needs, London: The Children’s Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. M. (1999a) ‘Questioning the new orthodoxy: the Looking After Children system and its discourse on parenting’, Practice 11, 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. M. (1999b) ‘Mapping child-care social work in the final years of the twentieth century: a critical response to the “looking after children” system’, British Journal of Social Work 29(1), 27–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallden, G. (1991) ‘The child as project and the child as being: parents’ ideas as frames of reference’, Children and Society 5 (4): 334–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. (1987) Justifying State Welfare, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwath, J. (ed.) (2000) The Child’s World: Assessing Children in Need, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack, G. and Jordan, B. (1999) ‘Social capital and child welfare’, Children and Society 13 (4), 242–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (1998) ‘Looking after children: a new approach or just an exercise in form-filling? A response to Knight and Caveney’, British Journal of Social Work 28 (1), 45–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. (ed.) (2001) Nobody ever told us school mattered: raising the educational attainments of children in public care, London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. and Kilroe, S. (eds) (1996) Looking After Children: Good Parenting, Good Outcomes: Reader, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenks, C. (1982) ‘Introduction: constituting the child’ in Jenks, C. (ed.) The Sociology of Childhood: Essential Readings, London: Batsford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, L. and Morris, J. (1995) ‘Easy targets: a disability rights perspective on the ‘children as carers’ debate’, Critical Social Policy 44/45, 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, T. and Caveney, S. (1998) ‘Assessment and Action Records: will they promote good parenting?’, British Journal of Social Work 28 (1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. (1943) ‘A theory of human motivation’, Psychological Review 50, 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. and Falloon, J. (2001) ‘Some Sydney children define abuse: implications for agency in childhood’ in Alanen, L. and Mayall, B. (eds) Conceptualizing child-adult relations, London: Routledge/Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, R. and Szwed, E. (1983) ‘The ‘best interests’ syndrome and the allocation of power in child care’ in Geach, H. and Szwed, E. (eds) Providing Civil Justice for Children, Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1995) ‘Easy targets: a disability rights perspective on the ‘young carers’ debate’ in Young Carers: Something to Think About (Papers presented at four SSI workshops May-July 1995), London: Department of Health.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. (1997) ‘A response to Aldridge and Becker — disability rights and the denial of young carers: the dangers of zero-sum arguments’, Critical Social Policy 17, 133–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P. and Petrie, P. (2002) From Children’s Services to Children’s Spaces, London: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, P., Dillon, J. and Statham, J. (2000) ‘The “child in need” and “the rich child”: discourses, constructions and practice’, Critical Social Policy 20 (2), 233–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assembly for Wales (2000) Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families, Cardiff: Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. (1996) ‘Young carers: challenging the facts and politics of research into children and caring’, Disability and Society 11 (1), 41–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, R. (2000) ‘Families under the microscope: parallels between the young carers debate of the 1990s and the transformation of childhood in the late nineteenth century’, Children and Society 14 (5), 384–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R., Ward, H., Jackson, S., Aldgate, J. and Wedge, P. (eds) (1991) Looking After Children: assessing outcomes in child care, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, C. (1970), Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, H. and Gough, D. (2002) ‘The price of a loaf of bread: some conceptions of family support’, Children and Society 16 (1), 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roche, J. (1995) ‘Children’s rights: in the name of the child’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 17 (3), 281–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryburn, M. (1991) The myth of assessment’, Adoption and Fostering 15 (1), 20–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield, G. and Thoburn, J. (1996) Child Protection: the voice of the child in decision making, London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seddon, D., Jones, K., Hill, J. and Robinson, C. (2001) ‘A Study of Young Carers in Wales’, report for Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care, University of Wales Bangor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2002) Children, Family and the State: Decision-making and Child Participation, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. and Cleaver, H. (2002) ‘Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families: Study of Implementation in Wales’, Report to Wales Office of Research and Development for Health and Social Care (SCC00/1/001), University of Wales, Swansea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N., Stainton, T., Jackson, S., Cheung, W. Y., Doubtfire, S. and Webb, A. (2003) ‘“Your friends don’t understand” — invisibility and unmet need in the lives of “young carers”’, Child and Family Social Work 8 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivette, C., Dunst, C. and Deal, A. (1997) ‘A resource based approach to early intervention’, in Thurman, S., Cornwall, J. and Gottwald, S. (eds) Contexts of Early Intervention: systems and settings, Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksler, F. C. (1991) ‘The hard times of childhood and children’s strategies for dealing with them’ in Waksler, F. C. (ed.) Studying the Social Worlds of Children: sociological readings, London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. (ed.) (1995) Looking After Children: research into practice, London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, H. and Rose, W. (eds) (2002) Approaches to Needs Assessment in Children’s Services, London: Jessica Kingsley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, J., Schirato, T. and Danaher, G. (2002) Understanding Bourdieu, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1990) ‘Psychology and the cultural construction of children’s needs’ in James, A. and Prout, A. (eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood, Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhead, M. (1997) ‘Psychology and the cultural construction of children’s needs’ in James, A. and Prout, A. (eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: contemporary issues in the sociological study of childhood (2nd edition), Basingstoke: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Palgrave Macmillan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, N. (2005). Interpreting Children’s Needs: Contested Assumptions in the Provision of Welfare. In: Goddard, J., McNamee, S., James, A., James, A. (eds) The Politics of Childhood. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523197_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics