Skip to main content

Evaluating a Computer-Based Marketing Course by Means of Focus Groups and Interviews

  • Chapter
Organising Knowledge
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

Being independent of place and time is becoming increasingly important in education and learning (Lang and Pätzold, 2002, p. 112). Therefore learning concepts using new media as a way of acquiring knowledge are increasingly being introduced at education institutions. E-learning, defined as a process of learning in environments with electronic media (Dichanz and Ernst, 2001, p. 7), is the new buzz word in discussions of computer-based learning. In autumn 2002 the Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (VUEBA) introduced a new marketing course in which students had the option of attending class and/or studying on-line. Course material was provided on a learning platform via the Internet. It consisted of a textbook, slides, text items and links to a variety of topic-related articles on the Web. The new course was evaluated during a pilot study that ran from April to June 2002. The research questions for the study are shown in Figure 9.1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baumgartner, P. (1999) ‘Evaluation mediengestutzten Lernens’, in M. Kindt (ed.), Projektevaluation in der Lehre (Munster, New York, Munich and Berlin: Waxmann), pp. 63–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bortz, J. and Doring, N. (2002) Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation für Human- und Sozialwissenschaftler (Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C. and Gronhaug, K. (2001) Qualitative Marketing Research (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. (1999) Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichanz, H. and Ernst, A. (2001) ‘E-Learning: Begriffliche, psychologische und didaktische Uberlegungen zum “electronic learning”’, Medienpadagogik, www.medienpaed.com/00–2/dichanz_ernstl.pdf, Abfrage 17.03.2003, 10:30 MEZ, pp. 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hold, R. (2002) ‘Qualitative Evaluation computerunterstutzten Lernens im Marketing’, diploma thesis, Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1998a) Moderating Focus Groups (Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, R. A. (1998b) Developing Questions for Focus Groups (Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lamnek, S. (1989) Qualitative Sozialforschung: Band 2 Methoden und Techniken (Munich: Psychologie Verlags Union).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, M. and Patzold, G. (2002) Multimedia in der Aus- und Weiterbildung: Grundlagen und Fallstudien zum netzbasierten Lemen (Cologne: Dt Wirtschaftsdienst).

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. and Kendall, P. L. (1993) ‘Das fokussierte Interview’, in C. Hopf and E. Weingarten (eds), Qualitative Sozialforschung (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta), pp. 171–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzig, W. and Schuster, M. (1998) Lernen zu lernen: Lernstrategien wirkungsvoll einsetzen (Berlin, Heidelberg and New York: Springer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. L. (1998) Planning Focus Groups (Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. and Richards, L. (2002) Readrne First for a User’s Guide to Qualitative Methods (Thousand Oaks, London and New Delhi: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1987) ‘How to use qualitative methods in evaluation’, in M. Q. Patton (ed.), Program Evaluation Kit (Newbury Park: Sage), pp. 1–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2002a) N6 Reference Guide (Melbourne: QSR International).

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, L. (2002b) Using N6 in Qualitative Research (Melbourne: QSR International).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titscher, S., Wodak, R., Meyer, M. and Vetter, E. (1998) Methoden der Textanalyse: Leitfaden und Uberblick (Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1998).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2004 Regina Höld

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Höld, R. (2004). Evaluating a Computer-Based Marketing Course by Means of Focus Groups and Interviews. In: Gadner, J., Buber, R., Richards, L. (eds) Organising Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523111_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics