Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Structures and Diversity in Everyday Knowledge: From Reality to Cognition, Knowledge and Back

  • Chapter
Organising Knowledge

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

The notion of knowledge is omnipresent in the field of knowledge management and knowledge organisation. This chapter begins with an epistemological reflection on the systems involved in the processes of representing, transferring and managing knowledge. It will be shown that knowledge is fundamentally tied to the process of cognition. By implication, knowledge has to be understood as a highly dynamic process emerging from the interaction between a cognitive system, its natural environment and its non-natural environment (for example artefacts, symbols and so on). Based on these epistemological insights, a framework will be developed to offer some orientation in the ‘jungle’ of notions and concepts of knowledge. The various dimensions of knowledge (such as local-distributed, representational-situated, mapping construction and so on) will be discussed, together with their relevance to the field of knowledge management. Investigation of the object of knowledge reveals that technological and information processing approaches to knowledge management and to our everyday knowledge cover only a small fraction of what knowledge actually comprises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ashby, R. W. (1964) An Introduction to Cybernetics (London: Methuen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, B. (1972) ‘Single units and sensation: a neuron doctrine for perceptual physiology’, Perception, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 371–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and Abrahamsen, A. (2001) Connectionisrn and the Mind. Parallel Processing, Dynamics, and Evolution in Networks (Malden, Mass., and Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, W. and Graham, G. (eds), (1998) A Companion to Cognitive Science (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischof, N. (1998) Struktur und Bedeutung. Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie für Psychologen (Bern: Hans Huber).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brook, A. and Stainton, R. J. (2000) Knowledge and Mind. A Philosophical Introduction (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, R. A. (1991) ‘Intelligence without representation’, Artificial Intelligence, vol. 47, pp. 139–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowitz, W. R. and Williams, R. L. (1999) The Knowledge Management Fieldbook (London: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangelosi, A. and Parisi, D. (eds) (2002) Simulating the Evolution of Language (Berlin and New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1979) Scientific Realism and the Plasticity of Mind (Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. M. (1988) Matter and Consciousness. A Contemporary Introduction to the Philosophy of Mind (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1989) Microcognition: Philosophy, Cognitive Science, and Parallel Distributed Processing (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (1999) ‘An embodied cognitive science?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A. (2001) Mindware. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Cognitive Science (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. and Prusak, L. (1998) Working Knowledge. How Organizations Manage What They Know (Boston: Harvard Business School Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dienes, Z. and Perner, J. (1999) ‘A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 735–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elman, J. L. (1991) ‘Distributed representation, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure’, Machine Learning, vol. 7, nos 2/3, pp. 195–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A. and Pylyshin, Z. W. (1998) ‘Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis’, Cognition, vol. 28, pp. 3–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, T. J. v. (1992) ‘Defining “distributed representation”’, Connection Science, vol. 4, nos 3/4, pp. 75–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelder, T. J. v. (1998) ‘The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 21, pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (1998) ‘Intentionality’, in W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds), A Companion to Cognitive Science (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamad, S. (1990) ‘The symbol grounding problem’, Physica, vol. 42, pp. 335–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinton, G. E., McClelland J. L. and Rumelhart D. E. (1986) ‘Distributed representations’, in D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Foundations (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 77–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, A. G. (1998) Paradigms of Artificial Intelligence: A Methodological and Computational Analysis (Berlin and New York: Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornblith, H. (ed.) (1993) Naturalizing Epistemology (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1990) ‘Mental imagery’, in D. N. Osherson and H. Lasnik (eds), An Invitation to Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 73–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosslyn, S. M. (1994) Image and Brain. The Resolution of the Imagery Debate (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebowitz, J. (1999) Knowledge Management Handbook (London and New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. H. (1991) ‘Coding and processing of sensory information’, in E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz and T. M. Jessel (eds), Principles of Neural Science (New York: Elsevier), pp. 329–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. and Varela, F. J. (eds) (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living (Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel).

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, P. M., Plunkett, K. and Rolls, E. T. (1998) Introduction to Connectionist Modelling of Cognitive Processes (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nilsson, N. J. (1998) Artificial Intelligence: A New Synthesis (San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995) The Knowledge Creating Company. How Japanese Companies Manage the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeser, E. (1976) Wissenschaft und Information: systematische Grundlagen einer Theorie der Wissenschaftsentwicklung (Vienna and Munich: Oldenburg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M. F. (1994) Reprasentation und Konstruktion. Kognitions- und neuroinformatische Konzepte als Grundlage einer naturalisierten Epistemologie und Wissenschaftstheorie (Braunschweig and Wiesbaden: Vieweg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M. F. (1997) ‘The Representational Relation Between Environmental Structures and Neural Systems: Autonomy and Environmental Dependency in Neural Knowledge Representation’, Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 99–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M. F. (1999) ‘The development of scientific theories and their embodiment in the representational activities of cognitive systems. Neural representation spaces, theory spaces and paradigmatic shifts’, in P. v. Loocke (ed.), The Nature of Concepts (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul), pp. 184–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschl, M. F. (2001) ‘Constructivisrn, cognition, and science. An investigation of its links and possible shortcomings’, Foundations of Science, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 125–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer, R. and Scheier, C. (1999) Understanding Intelligence (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension (Garden City, NY: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1934) The Logic of Scientific Discovery (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Port, R. and. Gelder, T. J. v (eds) (1995) Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, G., Raub, S. and Romhardt, K. (1999) Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen (Frankfurt/M: Gabler).

    Google Scholar 

  • Procter, R. W. (2002) ‘Knowledge elicitation methods and their major advantages and disadvantages. Communications of the ACM Tables’, http://www. psych.purdue.edu/proctor/ACM_tables.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, S. (1991) ‘Aspects of Information, Life, Reality, and Physics’, in C. G. Langton, C. Taylor, J. D. Farmer and S. Rasmussen (eds), Artificial Life II (Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley), pp. 767–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. (1991) ‘Die Konstitution von Bedeutung im Gehirn’, in S. J. Schmidt (ed.), Geddchtnis. Probleme und Perspektiven der interdisziplinaren Gedachtnisforschung (Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp), pp. 360–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986) ‘A general framework for parallel distributed processing’, in D. E. Rumelhart and J. L. McClelland (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Foundations (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 45–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart, D. E. and McClelland, J. L. (1986) ‘On learning the past tenses of English verbs’, in J. L. McClelland and D. E. Rumelhart (eds), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition. Psychological and Biological Models (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press), pp. 216–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. (ed.) (1987) Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstrukrivismus (Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, S. J. (ed.) (1992) Kognition und Gesellschaft. Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus2 (Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, C. E. (1949) The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, Ill.: University of Urbana Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolensky, P. (1988) ‘On the proper treatment of connectionism’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 11, pp. 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E. and Smith, L. B. (1994) A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1936) ‘On computable numbers, with an application to the entscheidungsproblem’, Proceedings of the London Mathematic Society, vol. 42, pp. 230–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turing, A. (1950) ‘Computing machinery and intelligence’, Mind, vol. 59, no. 236, pp. 433–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • von Foerster, H. (1973) ‘On constructing a reality’, in P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Invented Reality (New York: Norton), pp. 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1983) ‘On the concept of interpretation’, Poetics, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 254–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1984) ‘An introduction to radical constructivism’, in P. Watzlawick (ed.), The Invented Reality (New York: Norton), pp. 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1991) ‘Knowing without metaphysics. Aspects of the radical constructivist position’, in F. Steier (ed.), Research and Reflexivity (London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage), pp. 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Glasersfeld, E. (1995) Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning (London: Falmer).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, L. M. (2002) Dynamical Cognitive Science (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, N. (1948) Cybernetics: Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. A. and Keil, F. C. (eds) (1999) The MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F. (1986) Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design (Norwood, NJ: Ablex).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H. and Kim, T. G. (2000) Theory of Modeling and Simulation. Integrating Discrete Event and Continuous Complex Dynamic Systems (San Diego, CA: Academic Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Markus Franz Peschl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UCL and the Anna Freud Centre, London, UK

    Johannes Gadner (research assistant) (research assistant)

  2. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration (VUEBA), Austria

    Renate Buber (Assistant Professor in marketing) (Assistant Professor in marketing)

  3. QSR (Qualitative Solutions in Research) International, Melbourne, Australia

    Lyn Richards (Director of Research Services) (Director of Research Services)

Copyright information

© 2004 Markus Franz Peschl

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peschl, M.F. (2004). Structures and Diversity in Everyday Knowledge: From Reality to Cognition, Knowledge and Back. In: Gadner, J., Buber, R., Richards, L. (eds) Organising Knowledge. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230523111_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation