Advertisement

The Patriotism of the Russian Army in the ‘Patriotic’ or ‘Fatherland’ War of 1812

  • Janet Hartley

Abstract

In general, it is probably fair to say that the term ‘popular resistance’ conjures up visions of the reaction of populaces to invasion and occupation. But in the Napoleonic Wars — a period, after all, of mass armies — the peoples of Europe were conscripted for military service in immense numbers, thereby providing us with an alternative focus for the study of popular resistance. What justification is there for the study of the Russian army as opposed to the Russian people in 1812? The military performance of the Russian army in 1812 has been examined extensively but the ‘mood’, if you can call it that, of the army has not been the subject of the same level of investigation. Scholarship has focused on the so-called ‘people’s war’ (in Russian, the narodnaia voina); that is, the resistance by ordinary people, by which is meant essentially the peasants, or, in fact, the serfs, to the invaders and the contribution that this made to the defeat of the Napoleonic forces.1 The extent to which this popular resistance can be seen as ‘patriotic’ or ‘nationalistic’ has been the subject of extensive debate.2 On the whole, Western historians have dated the emergence of modern forms of Russian nationalism to the later nineteenth century and have characterized peasant resistance during the Napoleonic invasion as ‘xenophobic’ rather than ‘nationalistic’ but, nevertheless, the events of 1812 are regarded as an important stage in this development.

Keywords

Officer Corps Russian Historian Guerrilla Warfare Russian Army Regular Army 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Some of the extensive scholarship is summarized in my ‘Russia and Napoleon: state, society and the nation’, in M. Rowe (ed.), Collaboration and Popular Resistance to Napoleon (Basingstoke, 2003), pp. 186–202. For typical Russian (pre-1917) and Soviet analyses of the ‘people’s war’, seeGoogle Scholar
  2. V.P. Alekseev, ‘Narodnaia voina’ in A.K. Dzhivelegov, S.M. Mel’gunov, V.I. Pichet (eds), Otechestvennaia voina i russkoe obshchestvo (St Petersburg, 1912), IV, pp. 227–37, andGoogle Scholar
  3. L.G. Beskrovnyi, Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda (Moscow, 1962), pp. 337–48.Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    Hartley, ‘Russia and Napoleon’, pp. 191–6; W.C. Fuller, Strategy and Power in Russia (New York, 1992), pp. 207–18.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    V.I. Semevskii, ‘Volneniia krest’ian v 1812 g. i sviazannyia s Otechestvennoi voinoi’, in Dzhivelegov et al., Otechestvennaia voina, V, pp. 74–113 and M.I. Tugan-Baranovskii, ‘Voina 1812 g. i promyshlennoe razvitie Rossii’, in ibid., VII, pp. 105–12. A full version of the latter’s work later appeared in English as M.I. Tugan-Baronovsky, The Russian Factory in the Nineteenth Century (Chicago, 1970).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    S.M. Ginzburg, Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda i russkie evrei (St Petersburg, 1912);Google Scholar
  7. A.E. Zarin, Zhenshchina geroini v 1812 (Moscow, 1913).Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    P. Andreev, Narodnaia voina v Smolenskoi gubernii v 1812 godu (Smolensk, 1940).Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    See, for example, J. Werner, We Laughed at Boney (or, We’ve been through it all before) (London, 1943), which equates the British patriotic resistance to Napoleon with resistance to Hitler.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    For a concise summary of the practice and theories of guerrilla warfare, see W. Laqueur, ‘The origins of guerrilla doctrine’, Journal of Contemporary History, X, no. 2 (April, 1975), pp. 341–82. The Bulavin revolt in the reign of Peter the Great has been characterized as an earlier example of guerrilla war: cf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. C.W. Ingrao, ‘Guerrilla warfare in early-modern Europe: the Kuruc War (1703–11)’ in B.K. Király and G.E. Rothenburg (eds), War and Society in East Central Europe, (New York, 1979), I, p. 62.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Entry by L.N. Bychkov in Sovetskaia istoricheskaia entsiklopediia (Moscow, 1967), X, p. 886; translated inGoogle Scholar
  13. S.L. Wieczynski (ed.), The Modern Encyclopedia of Russian and Soviet History (Gulf Breeze, 1982), XXVII, p. 22.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Slezsinskii commented that activity in Smolensk province depended on the availability of nobles and officials to form these groups: cf. A. Slezsinskii, ‘Smolenskie partizany v 1812 godu’, Russkaia starina, CIII, no. 9 (September, 1900), p. 663; Kochetkov, ‘Partizanskaia voina’, pp. 167, 172–7; ‘Kniaz’kov, ‘Partizany’, p. 215.Google Scholar
  15. 19.
    I.I. Prokhostsov, Riazanskaia guberniia v 1812 godu preimushchestvenno s bytovoi storony: materialy dlia istorii Otechestvennoi voiny (Riazan’, 1912), II, p. 4.Google Scholar
  16. 20.
    Tolstoi , War and Peace (Everyman edn, London, 1958), III, pp. 295–6.Google Scholar
  17. 23.
    Alexander I to L. Wittgenstein, 29 December 1812 Old Style, in L.G. Beskrovnyi (ed.), Narodnoe opolchenie v Otechestvennoi voine 1812 goda (Moscow, 1962), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar
  18. 25.
    A.A. Pokrovskii et al. (eds.) Vosstanie Dekabristov: Materialy i Dokumenty. Dela Verhovnogo Ugolovnogo Suda i Sledstvennoi Komissii (Moscow, 1925–2001), XIV, pp. 148–9.Google Scholar
  19. 34.
    S.V Potrashev, ‘Uchastie Slobodsko-Ukrainskoi gubernii v Otechestvennoi voine 1812g.’, in Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda: Istochniki, Pamiatniki, Problemy (Borodino, 1998), pp. 139–41.Google Scholar
  20. 35.
    J.M. Hartley, A Social History of the Russian Empire, 1650–1825 (London, 1999), pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
  21. 38.
    J.T. Flynn, The University Reforms of Alexander I 1802–1835 (Washington, 1988), pp. 33, 62.Google Scholar
  22. 40.
    G.L. Freeze, The Parish Clergy in Nineteenth-Century Russia: Crisis, Reform, Counter-Reform (Princeton, 1983), p. 167.Google Scholar
  23. 47.
    P. Cottin and M. Hénault (eds), The Memoirs of Sergeant Bourgogne (London, 1975), p. 165.Google Scholar
  24. 50.
    See J.M. Hartley, ‘The Russian recruit’ in J. Klein, S. Dixon and M. Fraanje (eds), Reflections on Russia in the Eighteenth Century (Cologne, Weimar, Vienna, 2001), pp. 32–42.Google Scholar
  25. 52.
    A.V. Buganov, Russkaia istoriia v pamiati krest’ian XIX veka i natsional’noe samosoznanie (Moscow, 1992), pp. 159–60.Google Scholar
  26. 55.
    M.A. Nekrasov and S.M. Zemtsov, Otechestvennaia voina 1812 goda i russkoe iskusstvo (Moscow, 1969).Google Scholar
  27. 56.
    A. Zorin, Kormia dvuglavogo orla… Literatura i gosudarstvennaia ideologiia v Rossii v poslednei treti XVIII — pervoi treti XIX veka (Moscow, 2001), pp. 65–122.Google Scholar
  28. 58.
    For more details, see J.M. Hartley, ‘Napoleon — saviour or antichrist?’, History Today, XLI, no. 1 (January 1991), pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
  29. 61.
    O. Figes, Natasha’s Dance: a Cultural History of Russia (Penguin, 2002), p. 82.Google Scholar
  30. 63.
    G. Barratt, Rebel on the Bridge: a Life of the Decembrist Baron Andrey Rozen, 1800–84 (London, 1975), p. 37.Google Scholar
  31. 65.
    L. Ia. Pavlova, Dekabristy — uchastniki voin 1805–1814 gg (Moscow, 1979), p. 94.Google Scholar
  32. 66.
    V.I. Semevskii, Politicheskiia i obshchestvennyia idei Dekabristov (St Petersburg, 1909), p. 207.Google Scholar
  33. 67.
    V.A. Fedorov, Memuary Dekabristov: severnoe obshchestvo (Moscow, 1981), p. 124.Google Scholar
  34. 68.
    A.G. Mazour, The First Russian Revolution, 1825 (Stanford, 1961), p. 91.Google Scholar
  35. 70.
    I. de Madariaga, ‘Spain and the Decembrists’, European Studies Review, III, no. 2 (April, 1973), p. 149.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Hartley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations