Popular Resistance in Napoleonic Europe: Issues and Perspectives

  • Charles J. Esdaile

Abstract

Popular resistance is a subject that must inevitably lie at the heart of any discussion of the Napoleonic empire. In the first place, as the French themselves recognized, it was inevitable. As Napoleon told his brother, Joseph, in 1806, ‘Two weeks earlier or later you will have an uprising. It always happens in a conquered country.’1 On one level the reason was obvious, for occupation by the imperial armies was generally an experience that was as ruinous as it was unpleasant. But in addition to this there was also the issue of reform. To quote Michael Broers, ‘The consolidation of Napoleonic rule was a turbulent process, and the initial response it met with among the vast majority of people was resistance.’2 Resistance, then, was something that was always there, and, furthermore, something that the French themselves had every expectation of having to deal with as soon as they made a new conquest. That said, however, it was not just part of the general backdrop to the history of Napoleon’s Europe. Thus, its extent was one of the chief factors that determined whether a given state or region should be considered part of — in Broers’ parlance — the ‘inner’ or the ‘outer’ empires, and, by the same token, of the extent to which the reforms associated with Napoleonic rule took root. At the simplest level collaboration was — on one reading of the situation, at least — less likely in areas where the local élites on whom the French and their allies inevitably depended for the implantation of their policies were likely to find themselves the victims of murder or mutilation.

Keywords

Migration Europe Hunt Defend Toll 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    M. Broers, Europe under Napoleon, 1799–1815 (London, 1996), p. 101.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    A full order of battle for Wellington’s army in the summer of 1813 may be found in C. Oman, A History of the Peninsular War (Oxford, 1902–30), VI, pp. 750–3 (for the purposes of comparison, the full totals, excluding Portuguese, were eighteen regiments of cavalry, and fifty six battalions of infantry). For the presence of French deserters with the Spanish guerrillas, cf.Google Scholar
  3. C.J. Esdaile, Fighting Napoleon: Guerrillas, Bandits and Adventurers in the Peninsular War, 1808–14 (London, 2004), pp. 114–17.Google Scholar
  4. 5.
    G. Rudé, Revolutionary Europe, 1783–1815 (London, 1964), p. 114.Google Scholar
  5. 6.
    G. Best, War and Society in Revolutionary Europe, 1770–1870 (London, 1982), p. 168.Google Scholar
  6. 7.
    J. Black, Western Warfare, 1775–1882 (London, 2001), p. 55.Google Scholar
  7. 8.
    H. Fisher, Napoleon (London, 1912), p. 177.Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    For the proceedings of this conference, cf. M. Rowe (ed.), Collaboration and Resistance in Napoleonic Europe: State-Formation in an Age of Upheaval (London, 2003).Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    S. Woolf, Napoleon’s Integration of Europe (London, 1991), pp. 231–2.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Cf. C.J. Esdaile, The Wars of Napoleon (London, 1995), pp. 140–1. For a more developed version of the passage from which this quote is taken, cf.Google Scholar
  11. C.J. Esdaile, ‘Popular resistance to the Napoleonic empire’, in P. Dwyer (ed.), Napoleon and Europe (London, 2001), pp. 136–52.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    C. Barnett, Bonaparte (London, 1978), p. 145.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    C. Best, War and Society in Revolutionary Europe, 1770–1870 (London, 1982) p. 180.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    The two works concerned are F.G. Eyck, Loyal Rebels: Andreas Hofer and the Tyrolean Uprising of 1809 (New York, 1986), andGoogle Scholar
  15. L. Harford, ‘Napoleon and the subjugation of the Tyrol’, Consortium on Revolutionary Proceedings, XX (1980), pp. 704–11.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    For an example, cf. c. Oman, Peninsular War, II (Oxford, 1902–1930) pp. 229–30.Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    D. Gates, The Spanish Ulcer: a History of the Peninsular War (London, 1986), pp. 139, 142.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    J. Read, War in the Peninsula (London, 1977), p. 160.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    A. Miot de Melito. Mémoires du Comte Miot de Melito, Ancien Ministre, Ambassadeur, Conseilleur d ’é tat et Membre d’Institut (Paris, 1858), III, p. 568.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    The attitude of French memoirs to the guerrillas is discussed in R. Farias, Memorias de la Guerra de la Independencia Escritas por Soldados Franceses (Madrid, 1919), pp. 317–20, andGoogle Scholar
  21. J.R. Aymes, ‘La guerrilla en la literature testimonial francesa’, in J.A. Armillas (ed.), La Guerra de la Independencia: Estudios (Zaragoza, 2001), pp. 23–4.Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    H. von Brandt, The Two Minas and the Spanish Guerrillas (London, 1825), p. 54; A. Bigarré, Mémoires du Général Bigarré, Aide de Camp du Roi Joseph, 1775–1813 (Paris, 1903), p. 277.Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    A.L.A. Fée, Souvenirs de la Guerre d’Espagne, dite de l’Independence (Paris, 1856), p. 18.Google Scholar
  24. 29.
    Cf. G. Chaliand, The Art of War in World History: from Antiquity to the Present Day (Berkeley, California, 1994), p. 664.Google Scholar
  25. 30.
    For an analysis of the role played by regular soldiers in the ‘little war’, meanwhile, readers are referred to C.J. Esdaile, Fighting Napoleon: Guerrillas, Bandits and Adventurers in Spain, 1808–14 (Yale University Press, 2004), pp. 27–60.Google Scholar
  26. 32.
    E. Longford, Wellington: the Years of the Sword (London, 1969), pp. 247–8.Google Scholar
  27. 33.
    R. Humble, Wellington’s Peninsular Marshals (London, 1974), p. 70.Google Scholar
  28. 34.
    D. Chandler, ‘Wellington at war: regular and irregular warfare’, International History Review, XI, no. 1 (February, 1989), p. 9Google Scholar
  29. 36.
    G. Lovett, Napoleon and the Birth of Modern Spain (New York, 1965), II, pp. 665–7.Google Scholar
  30. 37.
    D. Alexander, Rod of Iron: French Counter-Insurgency Policy in Aragón during the Peninsular War (Wilmington, Delaware, 1985) pp. 239–41.Google Scholar
  31. 38.
    J. Tone, The Fatal Knot: the Guerrilla War in Navarre and the Defeat of Napoleon (Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 1994), p. 5.Google Scholar
  32. 41.
    For the article, cf. M. Artola, ‘La guerra de guerrillas’, Revista de Occidente, X (1964), pp. 12–43. The monograph isGoogle Scholar
  33. Antonio Moliner Prada, La Guerrilla en la Guerra de la Independencia (Barcelona, 2004). This offers some fresh information, particularly on Catalonia, but does not develop its subject sufficiently.Google Scholar
  34. 43.
    For these two works, cf. M.A. Pena, El Tiempo de los Franceses; la Guerra de la Independencia en el Suroeste Español (Huelva, 2000), andGoogle Scholar
  35. D. González Cruz, De la Revolución Francesa a la Guerra de la Independencia: Huelva a Fines de la Edad Moderna (Huelva, 2002). The general in question is Francisco Copons, whilst his papers — a veritable mine of information on the guerrillas — are held in the Real Academia de Historia in Madrid.Google Scholar
  36. 44.
    For some examples of the former, cf. R.G. de Barthèlemy, El Marquesito: Juan Diáz Porlier, General que fue de los ejércitos nacionales, 1788–1815 (Santiago de Compostela, 1995),Google Scholar
  37. J. M Codón, Biografia y Crónica del Cura Merino (Burgos, 1968) andGoogle Scholar
  38. M. Ortuño, Xavier [sic] Mina; Guerrillero, Liberal, Insurgente (Pamplona, 2000). As for the latter, cf.Google Scholar
  39. R. Guirao, Guerrilleros y Patriotas en el Alto Aragón, 1808–1814 (Huesca, 2000), andGoogle Scholar
  40. P. Pascual, Curas y Frailes Guerrilleros en la Guerrade la Independencia (Zaragoza, 2000).Google Scholar
  41. 45.
    For the paper concerned, cf. D. Koening, ‘Banditry in Napoleonic Italy’, Consortium on Revolutionary Europe Proceedings, V, (1975), pp. 72–9.Google Scholar
  42. 46.
    His most important contribution to the literature is M. Finley, The Most Monstrous of Wars: the Napoleonic Guerrilla War in Southern Italy, 1806–1811 (Colombia, South Carolina, 1994).Google Scholar
  43. 49.
    A. Grab, ‘State power, brigandage and rural resistance in Napoleonic Italy’, European History Quarterly, XXV, no. 1 (January, 1995), p. 40.Google Scholar
  44. 50.
    In addition to the above article, readers are also directed to A. Grab, ‘Army, state and society: conscription and desertion in Napoleonic Italy, 1802–1814’, Journal of Modern History, LXVII (March, 1995), pp. 25–54, andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. A. Grab, ‘Popular risings in Napoleonic Italy’, Consortium on Revolutionary Europe Proceedings, XX (1990), pp. 112–19.Google Scholar
  46. 52.
    The most representative of these articles are C.J. Esdaile, ‘Heroes or villains? The Spanish guerrillas and the Peninsular War, 1808–14’, History Today, XXXVII, no. 4 (April, 1988), pp. 29–35;Google Scholar
  47. C.J. Esdaile, ‘The problem of the Spanish guerrillas’, in A. Berkeley (ed.), New Lights on the Peninsular War (Lisbon, 1991), pp. 191–200;Google Scholar
  48. C.J. Esdaile, ‘“Heroes or villains” revisited: further thoughts on the Spanish guerrillas’, in E. Martínez Ruiz (ed.), II semanario Internacional sobre la Guerra de la Independencia (Madrid, 1996), pp. 191–210; and C.J. Esdaile, ‘La guerrilla española, 1808–14: el gran malentendido de la Guerra de la Independencia’, Trienio, no. 42 (November, 2003), pp. 55–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Charles J. Esdaile 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles J. Esdaile

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations